Prioritizing Key Factors Influencing University Students’ On-Campus Digital Consumption under AI-Powered Precision Marketing in the Greater Bay Area: An AHP-Based Approach

Against the backdrop of digital economy expansion, AI-powered precision marketing heavily shapes university students’ campus digital consumption. The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), a strategic hub with concentrated youth consumption power, presents a distinct campus context characterized by enclosed physical spaces and synchronized schedules. This study utilizes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to systematically identify, quantify, and prioritize key factors influencing GBA university students’ digital consumption decisions under AI-powered precision marketing. We construct a three-layer evaluation index system comprising 5 criterion layers (recommendation fit, marketing appeal, interactive experience, contextual fit, and data trust) and 25 measurable sub-indicators. Based on 114 valid questionnaires, weight calculations and consistency checks were performed. Results indicate that within the criterion layer, data trust exhibits the highest weight (0.2249), followed by interactive experience (0.2124), recommendation fit (0.1964), marketing appeal (0.1898), and contextual fit (0.1765). Globally, secure payment environment (0.0582), recommendation novelty (0.0510), and sufficient privacy protection (0.0507) emerge as the top three factors. Further analysis reveals that recommendation novelty outweighs preference matching; presentation of consumer feedback outperforms discount incentives; ease of use and cross-platform convenience take precedence over extreme response speed; and critical timing responsiveness prevails over real-time location adaptation. These findings demonstrate that GBA university students' decisions are characterized by "trust dominance, exploratory preference, social reliance, timing sensitivity, and convenience priority." This study provides a quantitative basis for relevant stakeholders to optimize the allocation of AI marketing resources. Meanwhile, it enriches the application of the AHP method in AI marketing and offers precise support for enterprises targeting the campus market.

AI-Powered Precision Marketing, Guangdong‑Hong Kong‑Macao Greater Bay Area, On‑campus Digital Consumption, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Decision‑making Characteristics

1. Alp, S., Yilmaz, F., & Geçici, E. (2022). Evaluation of the quality of health and safety services with SERVPERF and multi-attribute decision-making methods. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(4), 2216–2226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1984711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arvaj, L. B., Šubic, T., & Ahtik, J. (2025). Analysis of relevance and appeal of visual presentation of meat products generated using artificial intelligence. Applied Sciences, 15(15), 8328–8350. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bian, Z., & Che, C. (2025). How AI overview of customer reviews influences consumer perceptions in e-commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chafiki, M. E. A., Stitini, O., & Kaloun, S. (2026). A systematic review of advancements in context-aware recommendation systems. Knowledge and Information Systems, 68(1), 11–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-025-02627-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, D. N., Hu, P. J. H., Kuo, Y. R., & Liang, T. P. (2010). A Web-based personalized recommendation system for mobile phone selection: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8201–8210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chen, J. S., Le, T. T. Y., & Florence, D. (2021). Usability and responsiveness of artificial intelligence chatbot on online customer experience in e-retailing. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(11), 1512–1531. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2020-0312 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, Q., Lu, Y., Gong, Y., & Xiong, J. (2023). Can AI chatbots help retain customers? Impact of AI service quality on customer loyalty. Internet Research, 33(6), 2205–2243. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-09-2021-0686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Deldjoo, Y. (2025). Understanding biases in ChatGPT-based recommender systems: Provider fairness, temporal stability, and recency. ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems, 4(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3690655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Diederich, S., Brendel, A. B., Morana, S., & Kolbe, L. (2022). On the design of and interaction with conversational agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(1), 96–138. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00724 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Freedman, M. R., & Connors, R. (2010). Point-of-purchase nutrition information influences food-purchasing behaviors of college students: A pilot study. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 110(8), 1222–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2010.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ghorai, S. (2025). A study on the young students' spending pattern: A structured literature review. Journal of Academic Advancement, 4(2), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.58574/jaa.2025.v4.i2.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hamzah, A. A., Gazali, H. M., & Hussien, S. N. M. (2026). Digital consumption in higher education: An analysis of online spending among Labuan's university students. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 16(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2026.16.1.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jiang, T., Yuan, X., Cheng, Q., Shen, Y., Wang, L., & Ma, J. (2023). FairECom: Towards proof of e-commerce fairness against price discrimination. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 21(4), 3528–3544. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3334197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kallweit, K., Spreer, P., & Toporowski, W. (2014). Why do customers use self-service information technologies in retail? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(3), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kumar, A., Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Predicting changing pattern: Building model for consumer decision making in digital market. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(5), 674–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2018-0003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lamichhane, K. J. (2025). Spending behaviour of Gen Z consumers in the use of digital payment systems. Journal of Business and Social Sciences Research, 10(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.3126/jbssr.v10i1.80318 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Liu, X., Liu, S., Hu, X., Zhang, Y., & Fang, X. (2025). CBIR: A novel identification approach for college students in need based on consumer behavior psychology theory. Neural Computing and Applications, 37(6), 4663–4677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10900-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Magesh, V., Surani, F., Dahl, M., Suzgun, M., Manning, C. D., & Ho, D. E. (2025). Hallucination-free? Assessing the reliability of leading AI legal research tools. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 22(2), 216–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12413 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nguyen, M. T. T., Emberger-Klein, A., & Menrad, K. (2019). A systematic review on the effects of personalized price promotion for food products. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 25(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2018.1529647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pretolesi, D., Motnikar, L., Bieg, T., Gafert, M., & Uhl, J. (2025). Exploring user preferences: Customisation and attitudes towards notifications in mobile health and well-being applications. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2434892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Saaty, T. L. (1990). The analytic hierarchy process in conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Shin, D. H. (2016). Cross-platform users' experiences toward designing interusable systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(7), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1177277 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sipahi, S., & Timor, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: An overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775–808. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043920 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Song, M., Xing, X., Duan, Y., & Mou, J. (2023). I can feel AI failure: The impact of service failure type and failure assessment on customer recovery expectation. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(12), 2949–2975. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2022-0643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sundjaja, A. M., Utomo, P., & Colline, F. (2025). The determinant factors of continuance use of customer service chatbot in Indonesia e-commerce. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 16(1), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2024-0137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tan, P. K., & Lim, C. M. (2023). Factors that affect user satisfaction of using e-commerce chatbot: A study on Generation Z. International Journal of Business and Technology Management, 5(1), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.55057/ijbtm.2023.5.1.23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Utami, R. D., & Aimin, W. (2026). Balancing personalization, privacy, and value: A systematic literature review of AI-enabled customer experience management. Information, 17(2), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17020115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wach, K., Duong, C. D., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaitė, R., Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., … & Ziemba, E. (2023). The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wang, X., Wang, Y., Hsu, D., & Wang, Y. (2014). Exploration in interactive personalized music recommendation: A reinforcement learning approach. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2623372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wang, Y., Ma, X., & Yan, L. (2024). Research on AI-driven personalized web interface adaptation strategies and user satisfaction evaluation. Journal of Computing Innovations and Applications, 2(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.63575/CIA.2024.20104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wu, F., Li, M., & Huang, H. (2024). Innovation ecosystems and sustainable high innovation performance: Evidence from the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Sustainability, 16(21), 9487–9512. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zhao, F., & Wei, Q. (2025). Measurement and spatio-temporal evolution analysis of the business environment in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Sustainability, 17(16), 7426–7462. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zhao, Z., Fan, W., Li, J., Liu, Y., Mei, X., Wang, Y., … & Li, Q. (2024). Recommender systems in the era of large language models (LLMs). IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 36(11), 6889–6907. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2024.3392335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zheng, Y., Gao, C., He, X., Jin, D., & Li, Y. (2021). Incorporating price into recommendation with graph convolutional networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(2), 1609–1623. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3091160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zhu, L., Sun, M., & Yu, L. (2023). Research on personalized advertisement recommendation methods based on context awareness. Journal of Advanced Computing Systems, 3(10), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.69987/JACS.2023.31004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Wisdom Dental: A Digital Booking and E-Commerce Platform to Enhance Operational Efficiency, Predictive Analytics & Time Series Forecasting at Wisdom Dental Clinic in Pinagbuhatan, Pasig City
• Analysis of the Impact of Delivery Efficiency on E-Commerce Adoption by Courier Companies in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria
• A Comparative Study of Online Shopping Trend and Its Impact on Retail Sector Consumer Durable Goods in Wardha, Nagpur and Chandrapur Districts (2010–2020)
• The Impact of Delivery Performance on Customer Satisfaction in Malaysian E-Commerce: A Comparative Analysis and Strategic Framework
• The Dual-Dimensional Perception Mechanism of E-commerce Politeness in Cross-Border E-commerce Toys: A Comparative Deconstruction Based on Positive and Negative Critical Incidents