Project-Level Friction: Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Water Governance in Botswana

Authors

Godwin Joseph Musuku

IDE, University of Zambia, Great East Road, Lusaka (Zambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110200042

Subject Category: ENVIRONMENTAL

Volume/Issue: 11/2 | Page No: 457-471

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-13

Accepted: 2026-02-18

Published: 2026-03-04

Abstract

In many semi-arid and developing countries like Botswana, sustainable delivery of water infrastructure projects remains a persistent challenge exacerbated by climate change, recurrent project delays, cost overruns, and operational failures despite many countries having established policy frameworks. This study analyses the systemic factors influencing water sector project performance in Botswana, concentrating on practitioners’ understanding of national water and environmental frameworks, critical success factors (CSFs), and sustainability-related implementation gaps influencing project delivery. Conceptualising these challenges as manifestations of "project-level friction", the misalignment between policy intent and execution capacity, the study examines where and why such friction emerges. A mixed methods research design was adopted, integrating a structured questionnaire survey sent via email to water sector professionals. The study’s quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, ranking techniques (RII), and correlation analysis, while qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis utilising NVivo. The study results indicate that there is a considerable level of knowledge among practitioners about regulatory frameworks, and they also underscore insufficient integration of sustainability principles into day-to-day project management practices. The study reveals key challenges that impact water sector project completion through institutional fragmentation, insufficient technical expertise, and inconsistent regulatory enforcement. The study results indicate a strong positive correlation between policy literacy, stakeholder engagement, and perceived project effectiveness (𝜌>0.70). In addition, the study findings indicate that underperformance in project delivery is a result of shortcomings in governance, leadership, and execution, rather than technical inadequacy. The study offers valuable insights to guide policy development, institutional strengthening, and capacity-building efforts. It emphasizes the need for proportional investment in governance and human capital alongside physical infrastructure to achieve water sustainability in Botswana and similar semi-arid contexts.

Keywords

Project-level friction; Critical Success Factors; Implementation gap

Downloads

References

1. Adeyemi, A. Y., & Masalila, K. (2016). An investigation into the causes of delay and cost overrun in construction projects in Botswana. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research in Sciences, Technology and Engineering, 2(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon—It’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Batisani, N., & Yarnal, B. (2010). Rainfall variability and trends in semi-arid Botswana: implications for climate change adaptation policy. Applied Geography, 30(4), 483-489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2007). Case study methods in the international relations subfield. Comparative political studies, 40(2), 170-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biswas, A. K. (2008). Integrated water resources management: Is it working? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(1), 5–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Botswana Press Agency. (2024, September 12). Masisi launches smart prepaid meters. DailyNews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cleland, D. I., & Ireland, L. R. (2007). Project management: Strategic design and implementation (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2014). Nonparametric statistics: A step-by-step approach (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dai, Y., Huang, Z., Khan, N., & Labbo, M. S. (2025). Smart Water Management: Governance Innovation, Technological Integration, and Policy Pathways Toward Economic and Ecological Sustainability. Water, 17(13), 1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131932 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Department of Water Affairs. (2013). Botswana integrated water resources management and water efficiency plan: Volume 1. Government of Botswana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dirwai, T. L., Kanda, E. K., Sensanje, A., & Busari, T. I. (2021). Water resource management: IWRM strategies for improved water management—A systematic review of case studies of East, West and Southern Africa. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0236903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 41(6), 1319-1320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Global Water Partnership. (2000). Integrated water resources management: TAC background papers no. 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gündüz, M., & Almuajebh, M. S. (2020). Critical success factors for sustainable construction project management. Sustainability, 12(5), 1990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Howell, D. C. (2010). Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Humnabadkar, A., Karve, A., Shivbhakta, B., & Kokate, A. A. (2024). Advanced technologies for sustainable water management: A comprehensive review. International Journal for Future Multidisciplinary Research, 6(5), 382-388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ika, L. A., Diallo, A., & Thuillier, D. (2012). Critical success factors for World Bank projects. International Journal of Project Management, 30(1), 105–116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (12th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kinzelbach, W., Brunner, P., Von Boetticher, A., Kgotlhang, L., & Milzow, C. (2010). Sustainable water management in arid and semi-arid regions. International Hydrology Series Groundwater Modelling in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas; Wheater, H., Mathias, S., Li, X., Eds, 119-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kulkarni, T. (2022). Water Governance and Policy Challenges in Urban and Rural Drinking Water Supply in Developing Countries, with Insights from Multiple Industries. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology. SRC/JEAST-421. DOI: doi. org/10.47363/JEAST/2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. (4), 299, 2-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ministry of Minerals, Energy, and Water Resources. (2013). Botswana Integrated Water Resources Management & Water Efficiency Plan. GWP/ECOLEX. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International journal of project management, 32(2), 202-217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mogomotsi, P. K., Mogomotsi, G. E. J., & Matlhola, D. M. (2018). A review of formal institutions affecting water supply and access in Botswana. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 105, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mokalobotho, M. K., & Rammidi, T. V. (2018). Water Policies and Plans in Botswana: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Implementation Challenges of the IWRM-WE Plan. Sanitation and Environmental Health, 7(3). J-Stage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Moyo, S. (2019). Governance and institutional challenges in water resource management in Southern Africa. Water Policy, 21(4), 685–699. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Müller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2007). Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 21-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2012). Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 437–448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ngwenya, B. N., & Kgathi, D. L. (2011). Traditional public assembly (Kgotla) and natural resources management in Ngamiland, Botswana. Rural Livelihoods, Risk and Political Economy of Access to Natural Resources in the Okavango Delta. Nova Science Publishers, Botswana, 249262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Stakeholder engagement for inclusive water governance. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1987). Critical success factors in project management. Project Management Journal, 18(1), 67–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). PMI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rahm, D., Swatuk, L. A., & Matheny, E. (2006). Water resources management and policy in Botswana. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8(2), 157–183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sigalla, O. Z., Tumbo, M., & Joseph, J. (2021). Multi-stakeholder platforms in water resources management. Sustainability, 13(16), 9260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(2), 18-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Water governance in Africa: Policy and institutional frameworks. UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2024). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for prosperity and peace. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388948 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. United Nations World Water Assessment Programme. (2022). The United Nations world water development report 2022: Groundwater—Making the invisible visible. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Verzuh, E. (2015). The fast forward MBA in project management. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Willis, B. (2014). The advantages and limitations of single case study analysis. E-International Relations, 4(1), 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. World Bank. (2018a). Botswana – Integrated water resources management and water efficiency plan project. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. World Bank. (2018b). Project management in water infrastructure development: Lessons from developing countries. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Yin, R. K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd: London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles