Punctuality in Submitting Academic Outputs

Punctual submission of academic outputs is widely viewed as an indicator of responsibility, time management, and self regulation; however, many Senior High School learners struggle to meet deadlines due to distractions, competing responsibilities, and fluctuating motivation. Previous studies have established that effective time management is associated with improved academic performance and reduced stress, positioning punctuality as a critical self regulatory behavior (Macan, Shahani, Dipboye, & Phillips, 1990; Zimmerman, 2002). This qualitative study explored the lived experiences of 20 Senior High School students from Dangcagan National High School to understand the reasons behind timely and delayed submissions and the strategies students use to cope with challenges to punctuality.
Using a phenomenological approach, semi structured interviews were conducted to investigate students’ reasons for punctual submission, struggles encountered, coping mechanisms, and the advice they offer peers. Thematic analysis revealed nine major themes. The most frequently reported motivations were responsibility and discipline (85%) and stress avoidance or preventing cramming (85%), followed by respect for teachers, time, and deadlines (75%), and time management and organization (65%). These results support previous findings indicating that procrastination often driven by task aversiveness and low self efficacy negatively affects timely task initiation and academic performance (Steel, 2007).
Instructional factors were also found to influence punctuality. Prior research suggests that clear deadline policies and late point schemes can highlight early warning signs of non persistence, while earlier submissions are often associated with higher academic performance (Santelli et al., 2020; Jones & Blankenship, 2021). Overall, punctuality emerged as a multifaceted behavior shaped by self regulation, emotional management, social expectations, and instructional design. The findings suggest that implementing scaffolded deadlines, anti procrastination coaching, and transparent yet supportive submission policies may help students manage workloads, reduce stress, and improve academic outcomes.

student punctuality; time management

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books/about/Self_Efficacy.html?id=eJ-PN9g_o-EC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. Retrieved from https://ssrlsig.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/eccles-wigfield-2002-motivational-beliefs-values-and-goals.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Jones, I. S., & Blankenship, D. C. (2021). Year two: Effect of procrastination on academic performance of undergraduate online students. Research in Higher Education Journal, 39. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1293903.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990). College students’ time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 760–768. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Santelli, B., Robertson, S. N., Larson, E. K., & Humphrey, S. (2020). Procrastination and delayed assignment submissions: Student and faculty perceptions of late point policy and grace within an online learning environment. Online Learning, 24(3), 35–49. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1271877.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Schraw, G., Wadkins, T., & Olafson, L. (2007). Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 12–25. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Tuckman, B. W. (2002). Academic procrastinators: Their rationalizations and web-course performance. ERIC Document ED470567. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED470567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Wentzel, K. R. (2014). Motivating students to learn (4th ed.). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203108017/motivating-students-learn-kathryn-wentzel [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study