School Head Instructional Leadership Behavior, Sense of Efficacy, Work Engagement, and Work Values of Teachers: Structural Equation Model
Authors
Graduate School, Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060173
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 2287-2304
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-18
Accepted: 2026-06-23
Published: 2026-07-06
Abstract
Low work values among teachers are alarming. The prevalence of low work values among segments of the teaching staff poses a significant challenge to the organizational integrity of educational institutions. The study was conducted to determine the best-fit model for teachers' work values in Region XI. A descriptive-correlational research design with structural equation modeling was employed to measure levels using means and standard deviations, assess relationships and influence using Pearson's r and multiple regression, and generate the best-fit model for teachers' work values. On the one hand, the levels of school heads' instructional leadership behaviors, teachers' sense of efficacy, work engagement, and work values are statistically very high, with positive and significant relationships found among these variables. Model 1 is the best-fit model based on goodness-of-fit indices. This suggests that the Department of Education emphasize strengthening teachers' efficacy in student engagement and classroom management, maintaining all aspects of work engagement, and fostering core values of discipline and achievement, which are essential professional identity factors that impact educational outcomes.
Keywords
School head instructional leadership behaviour, sense of Efficacy, work engagement, work values of teachers, structural equation model
Downloads
References
1. Aktwil, J. (2019). Teacher performance and organisational commitment in Philippine urban schools. Asian Journal of Educational Management, 14(3), 187–204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Cao, J., & Zhang, W. (2023). Investigating the impact of value congruence on work engagement in EFL teachers: The role of teacher enthusiasm. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1264126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1264126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Carrier, M. B., Ratelle, C., & Corff, Y. L. (2021). Work values and job satisfaction: The mediating role of basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Career Development, 49(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453211043878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Check, J., & Schutt, R. K. (2012). Survey research is a method for collecting data. In J. Ponto (Ed.), Understanding and evaluating survey research (2015). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4601897/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chen, S., & Rong, J. (2023). The moderating role of teacher collegiality in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231217884 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dejardin, M., Hermans, J., & Coreynen, W. (2022). From explanation of the past to prediction of the future: A comparative and predictive research design in the social sciences. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100269 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Giray, L. (2021). Work values of secondary school teachers. https://doi.org/10.31039/jomeino.2021.5.2.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. González-Díaz, R. R., & Bustamante-Cabrera, G. I. (2021). Predictive sequential research design to study complex social phenomena. Entropy, 23(5), 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hallinger, P. (1980). Principal instructional management rating scale. http://philiphallinger.com/tool/survey/pimrs/a/researcherLogin-2.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Han, J., Wang, Y., & Wang, C. (2023). Self-efficacy, reflection, and resilience as predictors of work engagement among English teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1160681. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160681 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Jerrim, J., Prieto-Latorre, C., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D., & Shure, N. (2024). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional practice, and student outcomes: Evidence from the TALIS video study. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241300265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Klusmann, U., Aldrup, K., & Lüdtke, O. (2022). Emotion regulation competence in teachers: Implications for instructional quality and student outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000638 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Lacerna, R. (2016). Academic orientation and parental involvement in education during high school. Sociology of Education, 74, 210–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501–528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Lovison, V. S., & Mo, C. H. (2023). Investing in the teacher workforce: Experimental evidence on teachers’ preferences. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312231208956 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Matote, K. (2018). Work values and organisational commitment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. McCombes, S. (2023). Descriptive research: Definition, types, methods & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Prabjandee, D. (2020). Teacher professional development for changing identity, knowledge, and practice: A meta-synthesis of research. The Educational Forum, 84(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1698683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Utrecht University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Senthilnathan, S. (2019). Usefulness of correlation analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3416918 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy and collective teacher efficacy: Relations with perceived job resources and job demands, feeling of belonging, and teacher engagement. Creative Education, 8(5), 770–788. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.85057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Relationships between teacher motivation, job satisfaction, and stress: A complex interplay. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Tarka, P. (2018). An overview of structural equation modelling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Thien, L. M., & Yeap, S. B. (2023). Configuring effects of learning-centred leadership in promoting teacher professional learning and teacher self-efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(6), 1549–1576. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231211431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Yen, L. (2023). What is regression analysis? Datamation. https://www.datamation.com/big-data/what-is-regression-analysis [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study