Sensory, Vitamin and Microbial Quality of Snack Bar Produced From Sesame Seed (Sesamum Indicum L), Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) and Coconut Grits (Cocos Nucifera)
Authors
Department of Food Science and Technology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State of Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Food Science and Technology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State of Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Food Science and Technology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State of Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11080009
Subject Category: Food science
Volume/Issue: 11/8 | Page No: 152-165
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-13
Accepted: 2026-08-18
Published: 2026-08-27
Abstract
This study evaluated the sensory, vitamin and microbial quality of snack bars produced from varying proportions of sesame seeds, peanut, and coconut grits. Twelve samples were formulated using mixture design. They were analyzed for their sensory, vitamin and microbiological quality, using standard analytical procedures. Sensory evaluation showed significant (p<0.05) differences among the formulations in terms of appearance, aroma, texture, taste, chewiness, and overall acceptability. The sample made from Sesame 50.0%: Peanut 35.0%: Coconut Grits 15.0% received the highest scores for all sensory attributes and recorded the highest overall acceptability score (8.80), while the sample containing Sesame 44.5 %: Peanut 25.5%: Coconut Grits 30.0% ranked second in overall acceptability. Vitamin analysis revealed that the snack bars contained appreciable levels of B-complex vitamins. Vitamin B1 content ranged from 0.41–0.51 mg/100 g, vitamin B3 from 4.76–6.22 mg/100 g, vitamin B6 from 0.23–0.28 mg/100 g, vitamin B9 from 70.55–84.20 µg/100 g, and vitamin B12 from 0.025–0.055 µg/100 g. The microbiological quality of the snack bars was assessed based on total viable count, yeast and mould count, and total coliform count. The TVC values ranged from 1.26 × 10² to 1.84 × 10² CFU/g, while yeast and mould counts ranged from 0.54 × 10² to 0.89 × 10² CFU/g. Total coliform counts ranged from 0.14 × 10² to 0.27 × 10² CFU/g. The maximum yeast and mould count (89 CFU/g) recorded was below the 100 CFU/g criterion reported for cereal-bar products. The study concludes that snack bars produced from sesame seeds, peanut, and coconut grits possess appreciable levels of B-complex vitamins, acceptable microbiological safety, and favourable sensory characteristics. The sample made from 50:35:15 of Sesame:Peanut:Coconut Grits demonstrated the best overall performance and is recommended for further studies on shelf-life stability using different packaging materials and storage conditions.
Keywords
Sesame seed, peanut, coconut grits, snack bar, optimization
Downloads
References
1. Atli, A., & Katherine, M. (2024). Peanuts 101: Nutrition facts and health benefits. Healthline. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/peanuts (2026.2.9) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Animashaun, O. H., Olorode, O. O., Sofunde, K. S., & Idowu, M. A. (2017). Quality evaluation of pasta fortified with roasted sesame flour. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 11(7), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-1107012934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. https://app.legaldex.com/laws/this-fda-circular-shall-take-effect-immediately-and-supersede-other?utm_source=chatgpt.com;2026.8.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Aynalem, E. G., & Duraisamy, R. (2022). Formulation and optimization of complementary food based on its nutritional and antinutritional analysis. International Journal of Food Science, 2022, Article 1126031. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1126031 (2026.5.8) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Argessa, G., & Duguma, G. (2025). Development and nutritional optimization of a healthy snack bar for children using locally available ingredients. Science Frontiers, 6(3), 34–56. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20250603.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ayad, A. A., Williams, L. L., Gad El-Rab, D. A., Ayivi, R., Colleran, H. L., & Aljaloud, S. (2020). A review of the chemical composition, nutritional and health benefits of dates for their potential use in energy nutrition bars for athletes. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1), 1809309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1809309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Barranco, A. L. A., Broce, M., Lobo, H. D., Hontiveros, G. S., Fagutao, F. F., & Besoña, J. (2025). Development of fortified snack bar from Gracilaria salicornia (Dawson, 1954). Food Research, 9(6), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.9(6).290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chan, A. C., Mokhtar, S. U., & Hong, P. K. (2025). A systematic review on the determination and analytical methods for furanic compounds in caramel models. Journal of Food Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-025-06419-4(2026.5.15) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Danzart, M., Sieffermann, J. M., & Delarue, J. (2019). A new approach to measuring overall liking with the Many-Facet Rasch Model. Food Quality and Preference, 74, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.01.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Design expert, (2021). Design expert version 12. Stat - Ease Inc, 1300Godward Street, Northeast suit 640 Minneapolis, MN 55413. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Edima-Nyah, A. P., Nwabueze, T. U., & Ojimelukwe, P. C. (2019). Development and quality evaluation of snack bars from African breadfruit (Treculia africana), maize (Zea mays) and coconut (Cocos nucifera) blends. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 6(5), 74–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Erkmen, O., & Bozoglu, T. F. (2016). Food microbiology: Principles into practice. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119237860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (2024). FSSAIManual of methods of analysis of foods: Microbiological examination of food and water. https://fssai.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/Manual%20on%20Microbiological%20Examination%20of%20Food%20and%20Water_compressed.pdf (2026.1.19) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL(2026.5.15) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. King, J. C., Brown, K. H., Gibson, R. S., Krebs, N. F., Lowe, N. M., Siekmann, J. H., & Raiten, D. J. (2016). Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)—Zinc Review. The Journal of Nutrition, 146(4), 858S–885S. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.220079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Maia, L. C., Nano, R. M. W., Santos, W. P. C., Oliveira, F. S., Barros, C. O., & Miranda, K. E. S. (2021). Evaluation of the nutritional quality of cereal bars made with pulse flours using desirability functions. International Journal of Food Properties, 27(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013220983080. (2026.6.24) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Maghaydah, S., Abughoush, M., Aljanada, A., & Choudhury, I. H. (2024). Development and characterization of high nutritional value snack bar as a complementary source of nutrients in supporting the growth of pregnant women: Chemical, physical, and sensory properties. Italian Journal of Food Science, 36(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.15586/ijfs.v36i2.2538. (2026.6.24) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Malaeb, S., & Spoke, C. (2020). The glucose-lowering effects of coconut oil: A case report and review of the literature. Case Reports in Endocrinology, 2020, Article 8841781. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8841781. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mariotti, F., & Gardner, C. D. (2022). Protein quality, nutrition and health. Nutrients, 14(5), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14050947(2026.6.23) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Mattes, R. D. (2018). Snacking: A cause of concern. Physiology & Behavior, 193, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.010(2026.2.15) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. McCulloch, M. (2025). 15 impressive health and nutrition benefits of sesame seeds. Healthline. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/sesame-seeds [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Michael, A., Kyewalyanga, M. S., & Lugomela, C. V. (2019). Biomass and nutritive value of Spirulina (Arthrospira fusiformis) cultivated in a cost-effective medium. Annals of Microbiology, 69, 1387–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-019-01520-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Momanyi, D., Owino, W., & Makokha, A. (2020). Formulation, nutritional and sensory evaluation of baobab-based ready-to-eat sorghum and cowpea blend snack bars. Scientific African, 7, e00215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00215 (2026.2.4) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Mrowicka, M., Mrowicki, J., Dragan, G., & Majsterek, I. (2023). The importance of thiamine (vitamin B1) in humans. Bioscience Reports, 43(10), BSR20230374. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20230374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. (2024). Calcium—Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Pandiselvam, R., Thazneem, M. M., Ramarathinam, M. R., Beegum, P. P. S., Jacob, A., & Ramesh, S. V. (2024). Transformative effects of infrared-assisted hot air drying on neera syrup concentrated coconut flakes: A comprehensive evaluation of physical properties, composition analysis and antioxidant profiles. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 18, 10102–10108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02961-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Rosanoff, Andrea, Dai, Qi, & Shapses, Sue A. (2016). Essential nutrient interactions: Does low or suboptimal magnesium status interact with vitamin D and/or calcium status? Advances in Nutrition, 7(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008631 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Saif-ullah, M., Mehboob, K., Ahmad, M., Rafique, R. M., Hassan, M., Sharif, F. & Parveen, S. (2015). Microbiological Analysis of Different Snack Foods as Public Health Significance. Infectious Disease Journal of Pakistan. 24, 776-780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. SPSS, (2010). SPSS statistics for windows, release 18.0.0. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Inc; USA [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Syamaladevi, R. M., Tang, J., Villa-Rojas, R., Sablani, S., Carter, B., & Campbell, G. (2016). Influence of water activity on thermal resistance of microorganisms in low-moisture foods: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15(2), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Weissburg, J. R., Dean, L. L., & Hendrix, K. (2024). Changes in runner peanut quality parameters as a function of roast times. Peanut Science, 51(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.3146/0095-3679-51-PS23-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Wessels, I., Fischer, H. J., & Rink, L. (2021). Dietary and physiological effects of zinc on the immune system. Annual Review of Nutrition, 41, 133–175. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-122019-120635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Zhang, Y., Li, H., Wang, X., & Liu, C. (2024). Review of formation mechanisms and quality regulation of chewiness in staple foods: Rice, noodles, potatoes and bread. Food Research International, 187, 114459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Comparative Effects of Oven and Microwave Drying on Nutrient Retention and Consumer Acceptability of Watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus)
- Bamboo Shoots (Bambusa Vulgaris) Bites: A Flavorful Twist On Siomai
- Relevance of Scanning Electron Microscope and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technique in Food Research: A Review
- Effect of Drying Conditions on Nutrient Content of Dried ‘Nsukka’ Yellow Pepper (Capsicum Annuum L)
- Analysis of Proximate and Phytomicrobial Properties of Fluted Pumpkin and white Leadwort Obtained from Some Botanical Gardens in Warri South Local Government