Smart Safety Monitoring for Construction Sites

Authors

Mohamad Khairul Aizzat bin Rusmami

Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Hanis Damia binti Roslan

Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Nur Syaranisa Irdina binti Zaidinar

Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Danny Daniel bin Rahsidin

Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Muhammad Syafiq bin Ishak

Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Norhazren Izatie Mohd

Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300 Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110200064

Subject Category: Computer & Information Sciences

Volume/Issue: 11/2 | Page No: 763-774

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-10

Accepted: 2026-02-24

Published: 2026-03-10

Abstract

On-site construction safety management continues to face significant challenges due to reliance on manual inspections, paper-based documentation, and reactive safety practices. The absence of automated and data-driven monitoring mechanisms limits timely risk identification and informed decision-making. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a conceptual design of a Smart Safety Monitoring and Decision Support System (DSS) that integrates Internet of Things (IoT) sensors and computer vision technologies. The proposed system is designed to capture real-time environmental data from IoT sensors, detect unsafe behaviours and conditions using computer vision techniques, and consolidate all information in a centralized monitoring dashboard. By enabling continuous data acquisition and real-time analysis, the system aims to support proactive safety management and improve the accuracy of on-site risk identification and safety-related decision-making. Although the study is limited to a conceptual design and does not include empirical implementation or validation, it demonstrates the potential of data-driven technologies to transform construction safety management from a reactive to a proactive approach. The paper contributes to the existing literature by providing a structured conceptual framework for smart, technology-enabled safety monitoring systems in construction environments.

Keywords

Smart Safety Monitoring, IoT Sensors, Real-Time Monitoring, Construction Digital, Built Environment

Downloads

References

1. Abbas, J. (2020). Impact of total quality management on corporate sustainability through the mediating effect of knowledge management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aidoo, I., Fugar, F., Adinyira, E., & Ansah, N. B. (2023). Assessing the level of resilience in construction safety management systems in the Ghanaian construction industry. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 28(2), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc-04-22-0086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chong, H., Ma, Q., Lai, J., & Liao, X. (2025). Achieving Sustainable Construction Safety Management: The Shift from Compliance to Intelligence via BIM–AI Convergence. Sustainability, 17(10), 4454. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104454 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chi, S., Caldas, C. H., & Kim, D. Y. (2009). A Methodology for Object Identification and Tracking in Construction Based on Spatial Modeling and Image Matching Techniques. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(3), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00580.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Daniel, E. I., Oshodi, O. S., Nwankwo, N. I., Emuze, F. A., & Chinyio, E. (2025). The Use of Digital Technologies in Construction Safety: A Systematic Review. Buildings, 15(8), 1386–1386. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15081386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ghosh, B., & Karmakar, S. (2025). Development and application of a digitalised construction safety document management system for advanced constructions using building information modeling. International Journal of Construction Management, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2556965 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hasan, M. M., Abdullah, M. S., & Bakar, A. A. (2020). Wearable sensing technologies for construction safety monitoring: A review. Safety Science, 129, 104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Han, Y., Chen, M., Li, N., Ji, M., & Wang, X. (2025). Digital twin in construction safety management: Recent advances, challenges, and future directions from 4M1E perspective. Safety Science, 192, 107006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hinze, J., Thurman, S., & Wehle, A. (2013). Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Safety Science, 51(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Khan, A. M., Alrasheed, K. A., Ahsan Waqar, Hamad Almujibah, & Omrane Benjeddou. (2024). Internet of things (IoT) for safety and efficiency in construction building site operations. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78931-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kurniawan, K. L., & Machfudiyanto, R. A. (2023). A resilience approach to improving safety performance in construction. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 13(3), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.130307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li, X., Yi, W., Chi, H. L., Wang, X., & Chan, A. P. C. (2014). A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Automation in Construction, 86, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lu, Y., Li, Q., Zhou, Z., & Deng, Y. (2015). Ontology-based knowledge modeling for automated construction safety checking. Safety Science, 79, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Okpala, I., Nnaji, C., & Karakhan, A. A. (2020). Utilizing emerging technologies for construction safety risk mitigation. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000468 16 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Park, C., Soltani, M., Pedro, A., Yang, J., Lee, D., & Hussain, R. (2023). Transforming Construction Site Safety with iSAFE. In Digitalization in Construction: Recent Trends and Advances (pp. 213–234). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003408949-12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ramos-Hurtado, J., Rivera, F. M., Mora-Serrano, J., Deraemaeker, A., & Valero, I. (2022). Proposal for the deployment of an augmented reality tool for construction safety inspection. Buildings, 12(4), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sadeghi, A., Wachsmann, C., & Waidner, M. (2015). Security and privacy challenges in industrial Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Teizer, J., Allread, B. S., Fullerton, C. E., & Hinze, J. (2010). Autonomous pro-active real-time construction worker and equipment operator proximity safety alert system. Automation in Construction, 19(5), 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tripathi, P., & Mittal, Y. K. (2024). Current safety practices in the Construction industry: A case study approach. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1326(1), 012156. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1326/1/012156 22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Winge, S., Albrechtsen, E., & Arnesen, J. (2019). A comparative analysis of safety management and safety performance in twelve construction projects. Journal of Safety Research, 71, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zhou, Z., Irizarry, J., & Li, Q. (2019). Applying advanced technologies to improve safety management in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(5), 04019022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles