Stewarding Persons Deprived of Liberty: Experiences of City Jail Officers Amidst Covid-19 Pandemic

This study aimed to explore the life experiences of City Jail Officers as stewards of persons deprived of liberty amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Specifically, sought to the following specific problems: the experiences of the informants in the performance of their duties during the Covid-19 pandemic, coping with the challenges encountered in the performance of duties, and aspirations of the informants to improve the quality of jail service.
The phenomenological and qualitative approach in this study was utilized through interviews as the key process in the gathering of data. There were ten (10) selected city jail officers. Four (4) of them were individually interviewed while the other six (6) were included in the Focused Group Discussion (FGD). They were selected randomly but met the minimum qualifications. The research location is at Tagbilaran City Jail – Cabawan District, Tagbilaran City. A validated interview guide aided with the voice recorder for the basis of transcribing the responses of the informants. Utilization of Colaizzi's method, a phenomenological analysis procedure in analyzing the responses of the informants during the conduct of the interview.
For the experiences of the informants as Jail Officers amidst the Covid-19 pandemic, the themes generated were: Triumph through Unity, Collegial Harmony Initiative, Scarcity of Supplies, and PDL’s Misbehavior. In coping with the challenges encountered in the performance of duties, the following themes were created: Resilience Amidst Scarcity, Synergistic Wellness Renewal, and Virtual Family Reconnection, for the aspirations of the informants, themes created were: Adherence to Protocol and Training for Safety and Security in Innovation.
For the Tagbilaran City Jail Personnel, the implementation of several suggestions is recommended to inspire and encourage jail officers for relevant improvements.
Firstly, the development of specialized training programs tailored to address challenges unique to the pandemic, emphasizing the significance of humane treatment and effective guidance, is crucial. Introducing mental health support services for jail officers can aid in coping with the stresses associated with their roles during the pandemic. Establishing open communication channels within the jail facility is another key recommendation, fostering dialogue among personnel and creating a supportive work environment. The implementation of recognition programs to acknowledge and appreciate the efforts of jail officers can significantly boost morale and motivation.
As for the Local Government Unit (LGU), the following suggestions are proposed to make informed decisions based on the comprehensive overview. In addition, the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) to effectively address challenges through education and training, the following suggestions are recommended. Organizing workshops and seminars on relevant topics such as crisis management and adapting to new challenges can equip jail officers with the necessary skills.

BJMP, City Jail Officers, Jail Personnel, Covid-19 pandemic, Phenomenology

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Contrafatto, M. & Bebbington, J. (2013). Developing techniques for stewardship: A Scottish study. In L. Mook (Ed.), Accounting for social value (pp. 31–56). Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. & Donaldson, L. (2018). Toward a stewardship theory of management. In N. E. Bowie (Ed.), Business ethics and strategy (Vols. I–II, pp. 473–500). New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Jackson, B. A. (2015). Fostering innovation in community and institutional corrections: Identifying high-priority technology and other needs for the US corrections sector. Rand Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative research for the social sciences. USA: Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3-33). Boston, MA: Springer US. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. USA: Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Orlino, M. H. S. & Hapal, K. (2021). A Philippine national situationer on the Covid-19 pandemic. In Marginalized societies and the state in the time of a pandemic: The Philippine case (p. 7). Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Center for Integrative and Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Polifroni, E. C. & Welch, M. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on philosophy of science in nursing: A historical and contemporary anthology. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2008). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rogers, R. W. & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1997). Protection motivation theory. In D. S. Gochman (Ed.), Handbook of health behavior research: Vol. 1- Personal and social determinants (pp. 113–132). New York, NY: Plenum Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Periodicals/Journal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ansari-Moghaddam, A., Seraji, M., Sharafi, Z., Mohammadi, M. & Okati-Aliabad, H. (2021). The protection motivation theory for predict intention of Covid-19 vaccination in Iran: A structural equation modeling approach. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Atkin-Plunk, J. & Armstrong, M. (2013). The extensive administrative and correctional obligations of prison officers: A comprehensive examination. Journal of Correctional Administration, 38(2), 145-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Baccon, W. C., Salci, M. A., Carreira, L., Gallo, A. M., Marques, F. R. D. M., Paiano, M. & Laranjeira, C. (2023). Meanings and experiences of prisoners and family members affected by the Covid-19 pandemic in a Brazilian prison unit: A grounded theory analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(15), 6488. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Berkowitz, A. (2021). (Un)Masking the truth: The cruel and unusual punishment of prisoners amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Touro Law Review, 37(1), Article 14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Bonesteel, A. (2022). Corrections officer turnover at marquette branch prison during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Student Research, 11(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Charles, P., Muentner, L., Jensen, S., Packard, C., Haimson, C., Eason, J. & Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (2022). Incarcerated during a pandemic: Implications of Covid-19 for jailed individuals and their families. Corrections, 7(5), 357-368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Chauhan, R. & Maheshwari, N. (2021). An integrative approach for wellness: An assessment of potential of Ayurveda during Covid-19 pandemic. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 16(2), 100-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Chrisman, J. J. (2019). Stewardship theory: Realism, relevance, and family firm governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(6), 1051-1066. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. De Guzman, A., Ibarrola, R., Idolog, M. & Ignacio, S. (2020). Inadequacies in Philippine jail facilities: A comprehensive assessment. Journal of Prison Health, 15(2), 120-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Donaldson, L. & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Donaldson, L. & Davis, J. H. (1993). The need for theoretical coherence and intellectual rigour in corporate governance research: Reply to critics of Donaldson and Davis. Australian Journal of Management, 18(2), 213-223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Dorato, J. S., Sajorga, J. T., Sediego, C. L., Sumaylo, H. M. A., Culanag, T. Y., Jr. & Cuevas, J. F., Jr. (2022). Challenges encountered by the jail officers in enforcing the minimum health protocols. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 5(2), 85–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Eddleston, K. A. & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545-565. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Espia, J. C., Gera, W. & Hall, R. A. (2021). Local adaptations to central government shortcomings: Covid-19 responses in the cities of Iloilo and Cebu, Philippines. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 43(1), 53-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ezati Rad, R., Mohseni, S., Kamalzadeh Takhti, H., Hassani Azad, M., Shahabi, N., Aghamolaei, T. & Norozian, F. (2021). Application of the protection motivation theory for predicting Covid-19 preventive behaviors in Hormozgan, Iran: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 21, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Friedman, B. (2021). Toward a critical race theory of prison order in the wake of Covid-19 and its afterlives: When disaster collides with institutional death by design. Sociological Perspectives, 64(5), 689-705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Giuliani, R., Cairone, C., Tavoschi, L., Ciaffi, L., Sebastiani, T., Bartolotti, R. & Ranieri, R. (2021). Covid-19 outbreak investigation and response in a penitentiary setting: The experience of a prison in Italy, February to April 2020. Eurosurveillance, 26(38), 2001385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Ectj, 29(2), 75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Janmaimool, P. (2017). Application of protection motivation theory to investigate sustainable waste management behaviors. Sustainability, 9(7), 1079. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jones, C. R. & Narag, E. G. (2021). Insufficient budget and facilities: Realities of jail conditions in provincial areas. Journal of Criminal Justice Administration, 35(4), 401-416. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kahambing, J. G. (2021). Philippine prisons and ‘extreme vulnerability during Covid-19. Journal of Public Health, 43(2), e285-e286. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kaur, H., Singh, T., Arya, Y. K. & Mittal, S. (2020). Physical fitness and exercise during the Covid-19 pandemic: A qualitative inquiry. Frontiers in Psychology, 2943. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Klinoff, V. A., Van Hasselt, V. B., Black, R. A., Masias, E. V. & Couwels, J. (2018). The assessment of resilience and burnout in correctional officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(8), 1213-1233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Kokt, D. & Van der Merwe, C. A. (2009). The impact of organizational culture on service delivery in a major private security company. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 7(2), 114-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kuntsi, E. (2014). The significance of dedication in correctional work: Exploring officer involvement and motivation. Journal of Applied Criminology, 29(2), 105-122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Mackey, R. M., Yeow, M. E., Christensen, A. R., Ingram, C., Carey, E. C. & Lapid, M. I. (2022). Reconnecting: Strategies for supporting isolated older adults during Covid-19 through tele-palliative care. Clinical Gerontologist, 45(1), 204-211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Maddux, J. E. & Stanley, M. A. (1986). Self-efficacy theory in contemporary psychology: An overview. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 249-255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Molleman, T. & Leeuw, F. L. (2012). The influence of prison staff on inmate conditions: A multilevel approach to staff and inmate surveys. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 18(3), 217–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Morgan, D., Bacon, K. G., Bunch, R., Cameron, C. D. & Deis, R. (1996). What middle managers do in local government: Stewardship of the public trust and the limits of reinventing government. Public Administration Review, 359-366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Mufarreh, J., Waitkus, L. & Brooker, R. (2021). Leadership development in correctional and community supervision: Meeting the challenges of an increasing offender population. Journal of Criminal Justice Leadership, 26(4), 321-338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Narag, E. G. & Jones, C. R. (2016). Power dynamics in prisons: The challenge of inmate management and its impact on reformation goals. Journal of Criminal Justice Studies, 21(4), 311-328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Narag, E. G. & Jones, C. R. (2017). Challenges faced by prison wardens in Philippine penitentiaries: An examination of inadequate resources. Journal of Correctional Administration, 42(3), 215-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Patlunag, J. M. S. (2020). Services of the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP): An assessment. SMCC Higher Education Research Journal (Criminal Justice), 3(1), 1-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Pettus-Davis, C., Kennedy, S. C. & Veeh, C. A. (2021). Incarcerated individuals’ experiences of Covid-19 in the United States. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 17(3), 335-350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Putra, I. M. Y. D., Rasmini, N. K., Gayatri, G. & Ratnadi, N. M. D. (2022). Organizational culture as moderating the influence of internal control and community participation on fraud prevention in village fund management during the Covid-19 pandemic. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 351-362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Rampal, L., Liew, B. S., Choolani, M., Ganasegeran, K., Pramanick, A., Vallibhakara, S. A. O. & Hoe, V. C. (2020). Battling Covid-19 pandemic waves in six South-East Asian countries: A real-time consensus review. Med J Malaysia, 75(6), 613-625. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Saddam, A. & Mansor, H. (2019). The crucial role of a qualified workforce in the corrections sector: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Criminal Justice Operations, 14(3), 187-204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Shammas, R. (2017). Understanding PDL misbehavior: Exploring frustrations and deprivations in prison environments. Journal of Correctional Psychology, 42(1), 55-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Shosha, G. A. (2012). Employment of Colaizzi's strategy in descriptive phenomenology: A reflection of a researcher. European Scientific Journal, 8(27). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Testoni, I., Francioli, G., Biancalani, G., Libianchi, S. & Orkibi, H. (2021). Hardships in Italian prisons during the Covid-19 emergency: The experience of healthcare personnel. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Thartori, E., Pastorelli, C., Cirimele, F., Remondi, C., Gerbino, M., Basili, E. & Caprara, G. V. (2021). Exploring the protective function of positivity and regulatory emotional self-efficacy in time of pandemic Covid-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Tomar, S. (2013). Fear of deterioration: Exploring psychological effects on PDLs in prison environments. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 18(2), 123-140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Winwood, M. (2013). Building resilience: Navigating stress and adversity in prison environments. Journal of Psychological Resilience, 28(2), 145-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Internet Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. BJMP Comprehensive Operations Manual. (2015). Retrieved on May 5, 2022 from https://www.bjmp.gov.ph/https://bit.ly/3FimKEz. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Data Privacy Act 2012. Official Gazette. (2019). Retrieved April 20, 2022 from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Janardhanan, N. S. (2021). Social stewardship can help managers identify novel solutions amidst the COVID-19 crisis. LSE Business Review. Retrieved on September 10, 22 from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2021/02/23/social-stewardship-can-help-managers-identify-novel-solutions-amidst-the-covid-19-crisis/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Lofgren, E., Lum, K., Horowitz, A., Madubuonwu, B., Myers, K. & Fefferman, N. H. (2020). The epidemiological implications of jails for community, corrections officer, and incarcerated population risks from Covid-19. medRxiv. Retrieved on September 10, 22 from https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.08.20058894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Republic Act No. 6975. (1990). an Act Establishing the Philippine National Police under a Reorganized Department of the Interior and Local Government, and for other purposes. Retrieved on March 8, 2022 from https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1990/ra_6975_1990.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Republic Act No. 9263. (2004). an Act Providing for the Professionalization of the Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP) and the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP). Retrieved on September 10, 2022 from https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2004/ra_9263_2004.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Republic Act No. 11332. (2019). an Act shall be known as the Mandatory Reporting of Notifiable Diseases and Health Events of Public Health Concern Act. Retrieved on September 10, 2022 from https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2019/ra_11332_2019.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Villarin, T. S. & Basilio, E. (2020). DILG and its governance role in the time of Covid-19 pandemic. [Preprint]. Retrieved on September 10, 22 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346062885_DILG_and_its_governance_role_in_the_time_of_COVID-19_pandemic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Preparedness, prevention, and control of Covid-19 in prisons and other places of detention (2020), Interim guidance 15 March 2020. Retrieved on April 26, 2022 https://covid19-evidence.paho.org/handle/20.500.12663/787. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Occupational Culture in Relation to Job Satisfaction and Work Performance among Police
• Inmates' Character Reformation and Recidivism in Nigeria: A Study of Okaka Correctional Facility, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State.
• Life World of Former Female Basic Internal Security Operations Course (BISOC) Trainees
• Efficacy of Fingerprint and Facial Recognition in Enhancing National Security in Kenya
• No More Catcalling: Awareness of College of Criminal Justice Education Students on Republic Act 11313 Also Known as Safe Spaces Act