Structure–Activity Insights into an Adenosine Analogue (C₂₀H₂₅N₇O₆) Via Density Functional Theory and Docking Approaches

Authors

Dr. Devidutta Maurya

Asst.Prof. Department of Physics Government Degree College Barakhal Santkabir Nagar UP (India)

Dr. Snigdha Lal

Department of Chemistry R. L. S. Y. College Betia Bihar (India)

Dr. Rakesh Kumar Rai

Department of Physics R. L. S. Y. College Betia Bihar B R A Bihar University Muzaffarpur (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110200131

Subject Category: Biochemistry

Volume/Issue: 11/2 | Page No: 1405-1421

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-02

Accepted: 2026-03-07

Published: 2026-03-19

Abstract

Adenosine analogues continue to attract considerable attention due to their diverse pharmacological potential and strong involvement in enzyme and receptor modulation. In the present study, a comprehensive in silico investigation of the nitrogen-rich adenosine analogue (C₂₀H₂₅N₇O₆) was carried out to elucidate its structural, electronic, and binding characteristics using density functional theory (DFT) and molecular docking approaches. The molecular geometry was fully optimized at an appropriate DFT level, confirming the structural stability of the ligand. Frontier molecular orbital analysis revealed a moderate HOMO–LUMO energy gap, suggesting balanced chemical stability and reactivity. Global reactivity descriptors, including chemical hardness, softness, electronegativity, and electrophilicity index, were computed to assess the molecule’s reactive profile. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) mapping identified electron-rich regions localized mainly around oxygen and nitrogen atoms, indicating probable sites for electrophilic and hydrogen-bond interactions.

Keywords

Density Functional Theory (DFT); Adenosine analogue; HOMO–LUMO analysis

Downloads

References

1. Becke, A.D. (1993). Density‐functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. Journal of Chemical Physics, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R.G. (1988). Development of the Colle–Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Physical Review B, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Frisch, M.J., Trucks, G.W., Schlegel, H.B., et al. (2016). Gaussian 16 Revision C.01. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Trott, O., & Olson, A.J. (2010). AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Morris, G.M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., et al. (2009). AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 30, 2785–2791. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Parr, R.G., & Pearson, R.G. (1983). Absolute hardness: Companion parameter to absolute electronegativity. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 105, 7512–7516. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Koopmans, T. (1934). Über die Zuordnung von Wellenfunktionen und Eigenwerten zu den einzelnen Elektronen eines Atoms. Physica, 1, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lu, T., & Chen, F. (2012). Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 33, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Biovia, Dassault Systèmes (2020). Discovery Studio Visualizer, San Diego: Dassault Systèmes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pettersen, E.F., Goddard, T.D., Huang, C.C., et al. (2004). UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 25, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles