The Impact of Community-Driven Science Projects in Strengthening Public Trust in Environmental Policies

Effective environmental governance rests on two things: how willing citizens are to get involved, and how much confidence they place in the bodies that make and enforce environmental rules. Community-driven science projects, more widely known as citizen science, have become a practical way of drawing ordinary people into environmental monitoring, data collection, education, and the day-to-day work of putting policy into effect. This study examined how such projects shape public trust in environmental policy, looking specifically at whether citizen monitoring builds transparency and accountability, whether it raises environmental awareness and scientific literacy, and whether it deepens community ownership and participation. A descriptive survey design was adopted, with data drawn from 384 community members involved in environmental projects through a structured five-point Likert questionnaire, analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. Transparency and accountability were found to correlate significantly and positively with public trust (r = 0.672, p < 0.05); environmental awareness and scientific literacy also had a positive influence; and together with community ownership and participation, these three factors accounted for 64.8% of the variance in public trust (R² = 0.648, F = 117.426, p < 0.05). The study concludes that community-driven science projects are a workable strategy for strengthening environmental governance through broad participation, sharper accountability, and greater public confidence, and recommends stronger government support, formal integration of citizen science into policy processes, and greater investment in community-based environmental education.Keywords: community-driven science, citizen science, environmental governance, public trust, transparency, scientific literacy, community participation

Science education. Communicating science

1. Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chambers, R. (2017). Participatory rural appraisal: Principles, methods and applications. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176(1–4), 273–291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Danielsen, F., Skutsch, M., Burgess, N. D., Jensen, P. M., Andrianandrasana, H., Karky, B., Lewis, R., Lovett, J. C., Massao, J., Ngaga, Y., Phartiyal, P., Poulsen, M. K., Singh, S. P., Solis, S., Sørensen, M., Topp-Jørgensen, E., Yonten, D., Zahabu, E., & Khan, A. (2014). A multicountry assessment of community-based monitoring for REDD+. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R., Martin, J., Phillips, T., & Purcell, K. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291–297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elias, P., Shonowo, A., de Sherbinin, A., Hultquist, C., Danielsen, F., Cooper, C., Mondardini, M., Faustman, E., Bowser, A., Minster, J.-B. M., van Deventer, M., & Popescu, I. (2023). Mapping the landscape of citizen science in Africa: Assessing its potential contributions to Sustainable Development Goals 6 and 11 on access to clean water and sanitation and sustainable cities. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fraisl, D., Hager, G., Bedessem, B., Gold, M., Hsing, P. Y., Danielsen, F., Hitchcock, C., Hulbert, J. M., Piera, J., Spiers, H., & Thiel, M. (2022). Citizen science in environmental and ecological sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(64), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hecker, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J., & Bonn, A. (Eds.). (2019). Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy. UCL Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pretty, J. N. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302(5652), 1912–1914. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B., Krasny, M., & Bonney, R. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Skarlatidou, A., Haklay, M., Hoyte, S., van Oudheusden, M., & Bishop, I. J. (2024). How can bottom-up citizen science restore public trust in environmental governance and sciences? Recommendations from three case studies. Environmental Science & Policy, 160, 103854. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Stern, M. J., & Coleman, K. J. (2015). The multidimensionality of trust: Applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 28(2), 117–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study