Unplanned Land Use in Lebanon: Challenges and Strategies for Sustainable Territorial Planning

Land use planning represents a fundamental instrument for guiding sustainable territorial development and ensuring the efficient management of land resources. In Lebanon, however, spatial development has been characterized by extensive areas of unplanned land use, fragmented governance structures, and weak regulatory enforcement. This study examines the current status of land use planning in Lebanon and analyzes the institutional, economic, and socio-environmental factors contributing to the persistence of unplanned land development.
The research adopts a qualitative analytical methodology based on literature review, policy analysis, and spatial assessment of planning frameworks, with particular attention to the National Physical Master Plan of the Lebanese Territory (SDATL). The study evaluates the distribution of planned and unplanned territories, examines the structural drivers influencing land use decisions, and analyzes the economic, social, and environmental implications of uncontrolled spatial development.
The findings indicate that a large proportion of Lebanese territory remains outside detailed planning frameworks, resulting in urban sprawl, inefficient infrastructure provision, environmental degradation, and increasing regional disparities. Institutional fragmentation, political influence, real estate speculation, demographic pressures, and limitations within land administration systems are identified as key drivers of unplanned land development.
The study concludes that improving land use governance in Lebanon requires strengthening planning institutions, expanding the coverage of urban master plans, enhancing regulatory enforcement mechanisms, and integrating sustainability principles into territorial planning policies. The implementation of coordinated spatial planning strategies and participatory governance mechanisms can contribute to more balanced regional development and improved management of land resources.

Land Use Planning - Unplanned Land Development

1. Agrell, P. J., Stam, A., & Fischer, G. W. (2004). Interactive multiobjective agro-ecological land use planning: The Bungoma region in Kenya. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(1), 194–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bourgoin, J., et al. (2012). Toward a land zoning negotiation support platform: “Tips and tricks” for participatory land use planning in Laos. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(2), 270–278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bryan, B. A., et al. (2015). Land use efficiency: Anticipating future demand for land-sector greenhouse gas emissions abatement and managing trade-offs with agriculture, water, and biodiversity. Global Change Biology, 21(11), 4098–4114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. CDR – Council for Development and Reconstruction. (2002). Schéma Directeur d’Aménagement du Territoire Libanais (SDATL): Report of Phase 1, Diagnosis and Problematic. Beirut / Paris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. CDR – Council for Development and Reconstruction. (2009). National Physical Master Plan of the Lebanese Territory (SDATL). Beirut. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. EEA – European Environment Agency. (2009). Ensuring quality of life in European cities and towns. EEA Report No. 5. Luxembourg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization. (1993). Guidelines for land-use planning. FAO Development Series No. 1. Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization. (1999). The future of our land: Facing the challenge – Guidelines for sustainable management of land resources. Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization. (2016). Land tenure systems and land governance in the Near East region. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fawaz, M. (2017). Planning and the politics of urban growth in Lebanon. Urban Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fawaz, M., & Peillen, I. (2003). The case of Beirut: Urban development and planning challenges. EURE – Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Urbano Regionales. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fusilli, L., Marzialetti, P., Laneve, G., & Santilli, G. (2014). Urban growth assessment around Winam Gulf of Kenya based on satellite imagery. Acta Astronautica, 93, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. George, H. (2005). An overview of land evaluation and land use planning at FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Glave, M. (2012). Land use planning for extractive industries. Policy Brief, Department of International Development (DFID), UK. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Harb, M., & Deeb, L. (2018). Leisurely Islam: Negotiating Geography and Morality in Shi’ite South Beirut. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kavaliauskas, P. (2008). A concept of sustainable development for regional land use planning: Lithuanian experience. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(1), 51–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mexicanos, C. (2012). Ley general del equilibrio ecológico y la protección al ambiente. Mexico. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Metternicht, G., et al. (2003). Cartographic tools for improved spatial planning for rural areas: Multi-criteria decision making techniques and geographic information systems. Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference, Durban. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Metternicht, G. (2017). Global Land Outlook. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. MLIT – Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. (2016). An overview of spatial policy in Asian and European countries. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. NICE – National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2008). Public health guidance 8: Physical activity and the environment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Owens, S. (1994). Land, limits and sustainability: A conceptual framework and some dilemmas for the planning system. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19, 439–456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Paruelo, J. M., et al. (2014). Territorial Rural: Conceptos, Métodos y Experiencias. Buenos Aires: FAO, MAGyP & FAUBA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Paula, B. M., et al. (2012). Land-use planning based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Southeast Pampas of Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 154, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Public Works Studio. (2021). Urbanism and Law in Lebanon. https://publicworksstudio.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. RTPI – Royal Town Planning Institute. (2009). Good Practice Note 5: Delivering Healthy Communities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. The Legal Agenda. (2018). The General Directorate of Urban Planning: Arbitrary practice between the national master plan and general master plans. https://english.legal-agenda.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. UN-Habitat. (2021). Lebanon Urban Profile and Urban Development Challenges. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. UNEP – United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). State of the Environment Report for Lebanon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. WHO – World Health Organization. (2009). Zagreb Declaration for Healthy Cities: Health and Equity in All Local Policies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. World Bank. (2018). Lebanon Economic Monitor. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. World Bank. (2020). Lebanon Urban Development Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Eco-Microcredit and Rural Transformation: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Farming Practices and the Moderating Effect of Financial Literacy on Household Sustainability
• Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Innovative Methods for Rare Earth Element Extraction
• Global Trends in Sustainability Reporting: A Malaysian Evidence
• Blockchain for Transparency: Tracking Zero-Waste Practices Across the Fashion Value Chain in Bangladesh
• Entrepreneurship and the Path to Globalizing Jamdani Weaving: Tradition, Innovation, and Sustainable Digital Practices