Untrained Math Teachers’ Struggles with Special Needs Learners in Mainstream Classrooms

This research investigates the complex and challenges faced by untrained mathematics teachers when handling learners with special educational needs within mainstream classrooms, specifically under the Philippine MATATAG curriculum framework. As the Philippine educational landscape shifts toward total inclusivity mandated by Republic Act No. 11650, general education teachers are increasingly tasked with instructing learners with disabilities in regular settings despite lacking specialized Special Education (SPED) training. Utilizing a qualitative phenomenological descriptive approach, the study explored the lived experiences of fifteen teacher-respondents at Bukidnon Faith Christian School, Inc. to identify specific pedagogical, emotional, and institutional barriers preventing effective educational inclusion. Key findings reveal that educators encounter significant barriers in pedagogical adaptation, specifically struggling to balance the rigorous, stepby-step instruction of the standard curriculum with the simplified, individualized support required by students with special needs to grasp abstract concepts. Furthermore, a chronic lack of specialized manipulatives and curriculum-aligned tools forces teachers to spend extra hours creating personalized resources, leading to persistent feelings of stress, frustration, exhaustion, and inadequacy. Despite these, professional challenges simultaneously foster resilience, creativity, and increased patience among staff. The study concludes that the mainstream setting risks becoming an environment of "exclusion within inclusion" due to these systemic gaps and the absence of institutional support systems. Recommendations include mandatory professional development workshops, the provision of specialized instructional tools, and improved collaboration between teachers, parents, and special education specialists to alleviate the administrative and emotional burden on regular educators. Ultimately, targeted institutional changes are required to ensure the educational needs of all learners are equitably met in an inclusive environment. By addressing these systemic gaps, schools can better support both teachers and learners in a mainstreamed environment.

inclusive education, mathematics instruction, teacher training

1. Allam, Z. (2020). Pedagogical tools for inclusive education. (pp. 12–25) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Borges, A. (2022). Shifts in pedagogy for inclusive models. (pp. 200–215). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cognizance Journal. (2026). Teacher preparedness and SNED units in the Philippines. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 44–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dapudong, R. C. (2023). Challenges and opportunities in inclusive education: The Philippine perspective. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 12(2), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v2i1.62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Education [DepEd]. (2025). Implementing rules and regulations of Republic Act No. 11650: Policy of inclusion and services for learners with disabilities. (pp. 1–45). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. De Vera, J. L., et al. (2022). Barriers to inclusive education in public schools in the Philippines. Philippine Social Science Journal, 5(1), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v5i1.467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. EDCOM 2. (2025). The state of Philippine education report. (pp. 88–102). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Florian, L. (2021). The heart of inclusive education is collaboration. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(10), 1123-1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1923456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hernandez, T. J. (2022). The emotional labor of inclusive teaching in rural Philippines. The Filipino Teacher, 116(4), 88-95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jugan, T. (2024). Problem-solving adaptations for diverse learners. (pp. 15–30). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Macabenta, P., et al. (2023). Bridging abstract math concepts for LSENs. (pp. 5–12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Malanog, R., et al. (2024). Administrative support and teacher stress. (pp. 20–34). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Moreira, G., & Manrique, A. (2024). Multidisciplinary teams in mathematics education. (pp. 301–320). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Muega, M. A., & Echavia, G. J. (2021). Inclusive education in the Philippines: Through the eyes of teachers, administrators, and parents. Social Science Diliman, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.51131/ssd/2021.17.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Patina, S., & Bolongaita, M. (2024). Behavioral management in the inclusive math classroom. (pp. 102– 115). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. ResearchGate. (2025). Gaps in mathematics achievement for marginalized groups. (pp. 1–15). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Savolainen, H., et al. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy and burnout in inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 103687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103687 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tero, L., & Revalde, K. (2024). Feelings of inadequacy among general education teachers. (pp. 45–55). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tesoro, F., & Belmoro, M. (2025). Instructional materials as barriers to inclusion. (pp. 110–124). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tunes, E. (2025). Mastering inclusive math instruction. (pp. 80–95). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tzivinikou, S., et al. (2021). Teacher roles in inclusive mathematics classrooms. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 21(S1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. UNESCO. (2025). Professional development and global inclusion standards. (pp. 22–35). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wray, E., et al. (2022). Emotional well-being of teachers in inclusive settings: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1205–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09667-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study