Upcycling and Transforming Poly-Ethylene Terephthalate (PET) Bottles into Value Added Products for Household and Interior Decoration

This study investigated the upcycling and transformation of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles into value-added products for household and interior decoration. Conducted at FUNAAB International School (FUNIS) and Muslim High School in Isolu community- Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. The research adopted a mixed research design which involved a practical (experimental) and theoretical aspects (quantitative). A mixed sampling technique (purposive, stratified, and simple random/convenience sampling) was employed to select 150 student respondents. With upcycled PET products household and interior decoration displayed, data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, and mean scores) and an independent t-test for hypothesis testing. The findings revealed high levels of preference and acceptance for upcycled PET bottle products. Specifically, 78.7% of respondents agreed that upcycled baskets are affordable (M = 1.79, SD = 0.41), while 80.0% affirmed that lamps would be appreciated by environmentally conscious consumers (M = 1.80, SD = 0.40). Durability perceptions varied: 72.0% rated baskets as wear-resistant (M = 1.72, SD = 0.45), whereas only 59.3% agreed for lanterns (M = 1.59, SD = 0.49). The independent t-test revealed no statistically significant difference in perception between FUNIS (M = 3.22, SD = 0.69) and MHSI students (M = 3.06, SD = 0.58), with p = 0.144 (< 0.05) despite mean differences. The study concludes that upcycling PET bottles offers a sustainable solution for plastic waste management while enhancing home aesthetics. There is need to integrate upcycling into school curricula, organise community workshops, launch awareness campaigns, and provide policy support for upcycling enterprises.

Upcycling, Transforming, Pet Bottles, Value Added Products, Household, Interior Decoration

1. Adewuyi, A., & Ojedokun, A. T. (2020). Chemically Modified Biosorbents and Their Role in the Removal of Emerging Pharmaceutical Waste in the Water System. Waste Management, 108, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Auta, H. S., Emenike, C. U., & Fauziah, S. H. (2017). Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions. Environment International, 102, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barnes, D. K. A., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M. (2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1985–1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Biedermann-Brem, S., & Grob, K. (2008). Release of bisphenol A from polycarbonate baby bottles: water hardness as the most relevant factor. European Food Research and Technology, 228, 679–685. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Boonpracha, J., Chanplin, P., Ngampipat, C., & Sermsri, N. (2024). Upcycling for repurposing waste into creative products. Creativity Studies, 17(1), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2024.18128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2016). The new plastics economy: Rethinking the future of plastics. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Completing the picture: How the circular economy tackles climate change. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Friedel, R. (1983). Pioneer plastic: The making and selling of celluloid. University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. GeisSDoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Groh, K. J., Backhaus, T., Carney-Almroth, B., Geueke, B., Inostroza, P. A., Lennquist, A., … Muncke, J. (2019). Overview of known plastic packaging-associated chemicals and their hazards. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 3253–3268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., … Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kumar, P., & Singh, R. (2020). Educational interventions and adoption of upcycled plastic bottle decorations among homemakers in Ranikhet City. Journal of Environmental Education, 45(2), 112–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lithner, D., Larsson, Å., & Dave, G. (2011). Environmental and health hazard ranking and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical composition. Science of the Total Environment, 409(18), 3309–3324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Meikle, J. L. (1995). American plastic: A cultural history. Rutgers University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Milad, A. (2025). Recycled and upcycled materials in contemporary architecture and civil engineering: Their applications, benefits, and challenges. Cleaner Waste Systems, 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. PlasticsEurope. (2022). Plastics – the facts 2022. https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Polyportis, A., Magnier, L., & Mugge, R. (2022). Consumer acceptance of products made from recycled materials: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 186, Article 106533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106533 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Smith, J. (2023). Interior design principles and practices (2nd ed.). Design Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/531435a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sung, K., Cooper, T., & Kettley, S. (2019). Individual upcycling in the UK: Insights for eco-design and sustainable consumer behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Suwanda, S., Syahputri, K., & Rizkiansyah, M. (2023). Analysis of plastic waste management in the interior decoration industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1210(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1210/1/012019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Thompson, R. C., Olsen, Y., Mitchell, R. P., Davis, A., Rowland, S. J., John, A. W. G., McGonigle, D., & Russell, A. E. (2004). Lost at sea: Where is all the plastic? Science, 304(5672), 838. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ugosor, T. P., Terna, K., Timothy, O. T., David, A. K., & Kaana, A. (2025). Microplastics pollution in Nigerian aquatic ecosystems: Sources, pathways, impacts, and mitigation strategies. A review. American Journal of Environment and Climate, 4(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajec.v4i3.6354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2021). Sustainable Development Goals report 2021. United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2018). Single-use plastics: A roadmap for sustainability. United Nations Environment Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2021). From pollution to solution: A global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution. United Nations Environment Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. UN-Habitat. (2020). Waste Wise Cities Tool: A guide for assessing municipal solid waste management performance. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Plastics: Material-specific data. https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/plastics-material-specific-data [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wautelet, T. (2018). Exploring the role of independent retailers in the circular economy: a case study approach (Master's thesis, EUFOM European University for Economics and Management). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17085.15847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Webb, H., Arnott, J., Crawford, R., & Ivanova, E. (2013). Plastic degradation and its environmental implications with special reference to poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polymers, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym5010001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Westerhoff, P., Prapaipong, P., Shock, E., & Hillaireau, A. (2007). Antimony leaching from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic used for bottled drinking water. Water Research, 42(3), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Williams, K. (2017). Marketing sustainable design: Barriers and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. World Economic Forum. (2016). The new plastics economy: Catalysing action. World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area