Uploading but Not Teaching: A Governance-Centered Analysis of Selective Digital Compliance in Post-Conflict African Higher Education

E-learning mandates in sub-Saharan African higher education institutions routinely presuppose that faculty compliance follows naturally from policy directives and infrastructure deployment. This assumption is rarely tested empirically in post-conflict, low-resource contexts. This paper draws on systematic direct observation of Google Classroom activity across 133 course sections, 82 faculty members, and 4,673 students at African Methodist Episcopal University (AMEU) in Monrovia, Liberia, assessed against standardised benchmarks across four defined compliance dimensions: syllabus posting, learning resource upload, digital midterm exam delivery, and grade posting. Each section was coded into a proficiency rating of Very Good, Fair, or Poor based on cumulative performance. The data reveal a sharp divergence between passive and active digital pedagogy. Passive compliance was relatively strong: 94% of faculty uploaded learning resources, and 73.7% posted syllabi. Active engagement collapsed: only 28.6% delivered midterm examinations digitally, and just 24.1% posted grades through the learning management system. Overall proficiency was rated Very Good in 37.6% of sections, Fair in 60.2%, and Poor in 2.3%. Cross-referencing with parallel attendance monitoring records further revealed that 86.2% of faculty recording absences were rated Fair or Poor for digital performance, establishing a coherent pattern of professional disengagement rather than isolated non-compliance. Applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations alongside African higher education governance scholarship, the paper argues that the deficit reflects a structural governance failure, not a training gap. Social affiliation dynamics, absent consequence mechanisms, faith-based institutional culture, and post-conflict educational inheritance are identified as the primary systemic drivers. The paper contributes original disaggregated institutional evidence from a Liberian denominational university context that remains virtually absent from the empirical e-learning literature, with concrete implications for governance reform.

E-learning compliance, digital pedagogy, learning management system adoption, faculty performance

1. Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and opportunities of e-learning implementation in Iraq: A case of public universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the e-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Boateng, F. (2020). Higher education systems and institutions, Liberia. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339202470 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bousbahi, F., & Alrazgan, M.S. (2015). Investigating IT faculty resistance to learning management system adoption using latent variables in an acceptance technology model. The Scientific World Journal, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/375651 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ibrahim, H., Abdulai, M., Iddrisu, S., & Konlan, I. (2024). Society and organizational leadership: Investigating the sociocultural construction of toxic and constructive leaders in Ghana. Leadership, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958241237698 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kennedy, G. M. (2025a). Digital inclusion in Liberia's education sector: Review of barriers, policy gaps, and strategic interventions. American Journal of Educational Research, 13(3), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-13-3-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kennedy, G. M. (2025b). Integrating ICT in higher education in Liberia: A review of challenges, best practices, and opportunities. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390626540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kuuyelleh, E. N., Akanpaadgi, E., & Ansoglenang, G. (2025). Perceived organisational injustices and academic staff turnover intentions in Ghanaian technical universities. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mpungose, C. B. (2021). Emergent transition from face-to-face to online learning in a South African university in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00871-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. National Commission on Higher Education. (2020). E-learning standards for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Liberia. Ministry of Education, Republic of Liberia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ogunode, N. J., Obioma, M. A., & Belloh, A. M. (2024). Accountability in university system in Nigeria: Challenges and way forward. European Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy, 1(2), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.61796/jaide.v1i2.212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Olabiyi, O. J., Du Plessis, M., & Van Vuuren, C. J. (2024). Unveiling the toxic leadership culture in South African universities: Authoritarian behaviour, cronyism and self-serving practices. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1446935. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1446935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sumo, D. Z., Zhang, L., & Sumo, P. D. (2023). Career choice for ICT among Liberian students: A multi-criteria decision-making study using analytical hierarchy process. Heliyon, 9(5), e16445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users' acceptance of e-learning in developing countries: A structural equation modelling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 306–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have higher education institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Health Crisis on the Evolution of the Use of Scientific Knowledge Sharing Tools by Academics: A Comparative Study Within the Faculty of Sciences of Tunis
• Availability and Accessibility of Computers and ICT Resources in Teaching and Learning Chemistry in Secondary Schools in Nyamira County, Kenya
• Building and Applying the Reckless Thinking Scale among Students of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences
• Evaluating the Usability of the 3Fs Flipped Model to Enhance Student Engagement: A Case Study at INTI International College Penang
• Enhancing Attendance Authenticity in Higher Education Using A QR Code and GPS-Based Smart Attendance System