Water Quality Assessment of Dye Wastewater after Photocatalytic Treatment with Reduced Graphene Oxide–Metal Oxide Nanocomposites

Authors

Roopa M C

Department of Studies in Environmental Science, Davangere University, Davangere, Karnataka 577004, India (India)

Sharadadevi Kallimani

Department of Studies in Environmental Science, Davangere University, Davangere, Karnataka 577004, India (India)

Umadevi K M

Department of Studies in Environmental Science, Davangere University, Davangere, Karnataka 577004, India (India)

Shilpa P Raikar

Department of Studies in Environmental Science, Davangere University, Davangere, Karnataka 577004, India (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070121

Subject Category: Environmental Science

Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 1722-1732

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-16

Accepted: 2026-07-21

Published: 2026-08-08

Abstract

Textile dyeing effluents remain among the most persistent categories of industrial wastewater owing to their intense color, complex aromatic structures, and resistance to conventional biological treatment. This study reports the post-treatment physicochemical assessment of two structurally distinct textile dyes, the cationic triarylmethane dye Methyl Violet (MV) and the anionic xanthene dye Rose Bengal (RB), following batch photocatalytic treatment with four reduced graphene oxide (rGO)–metal oxide nanocomposites: rGO–CeO₂, rGO–CuO, rGO–MnO₂, and rGO–ZnO. Untreated (baseline) and catalyst-treated dye solutions were independently analyzed by an accredited third-party testing laboratory for color, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and the dye-associated counter-ion species chloride, nitrogen, iodine, and potassium, and the results were benchmarked against the Bureau of Indian Standards drinking-water specification IS 10500:2012. Relative to the untreated baseline, chloride and nitrogen loads in the MV system fell by 18–74% and 36–81%, respectively, depending on the catalyst, while in the RB system, chloride, iodine, and potassium loads fell by 30–71%, 51–87%, and 23–75%, respectively. Electrical conductivity rose in every treated sample, consistent with the release of smaller, more mobile ionic fragments during oxidative breakdown of the parent dye chromophores. A composite ionic-load reduction index (CILRI), defined here as the mean percentage reduction across the measured dye-associated ionic species, ranked rGO–MnO₂ (55.1%) marginally ahead of rGO–CeO₂ (53.8%) and rGO–CuO (51.6%) for MV, and rGO–CuO (70.9%) clearly ahead of rGO–CeO₂ (58.2%), rGO–ZnO (60.0%), and rGO–MnO₂ (46.8%) for RB. Most treated parameters fell within the desirable limits of IS 10500:2012, indicating that rGO–metal oxide photocatalysis can move textile dye wastewater substantially toward potable-quality benchmarks for these specific parameters. However, color readings at or below the instrument quantification limit in both untreated and treated samples, and the absence of direct spectrophotometric dye concentration or catalyst characterization data in this data set, are noted as limitations that warrant follow-up study.

Keywords

rGO; nanocomposite; photocatalysis

Downloads

References

1. Yaseen, D. A., & Scholz, M. (2019). Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: A critical review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(2), 1193–1226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Tohamy, R., Ali, S. S., Li, F., Okasha, K. M., Mahmoud, Y. A.-G., Elsamahy, T., Jiao, H., Fu, Y., & Sun, J. (2022). A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: Ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 231, Article 113160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hummers, W. S., & Offeman, R. E. (1958). Preparation of graphitic oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 80(6), 1339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Habte, A. T., & Ayele, D. W. (2019). Synthesis and characterization of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) started from graphene oxide (GO) using the Tour method with different parameters. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, Article 5058163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Mylarappa, M., Selvam, C., Sanjeevappa, H. K., Prasanna Kumar, S. G., Krishnamurthy, G., & Muttanagoud, K. N. (2024). Reduced graphene oxide loaded La2O3 nanocomposite for dye degradation and antioxidant studies. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces, 14, Article 100202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Rajendran, R., Shrestha, L. K., Minami, K., Subramanian, M., Jayavel, R., & Ariga, K. (2014). Dimensionally integrated nanoarchitectonics for a novel composite from 0D, 1D, and 2D nanomaterials: RGO/CNT/CeO2 ternary nanocomposites with electrochemical performance. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2(43), 18480–18487. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kumar, S., Ojha, A. K., et al. (2016). One-step in situ synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticles grown on reduced graphene oxide as an excellent fluorescent and photocatalyst material under sunlight irradiation. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 18, 11157–11167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Prasad, G., Tamang, S., Biswas, J., Jha, S., & Bhattacharyya, N. K. (2025). A novel CuO/rGO composite for catalytic degradation of methylene blue. Next Materials. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ghosh, S., Basu, S., & Baskey (Sen), M. (2017). Decorating mechanism of Mn3O4 nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide surface through reflux condensation method to improve photocatalytic performance. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 28, 17860–17870. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sodeinde, K. O., Olusanya, S. O., Lawal, O. S., Sriariyanun, M., & Adediran, A. A. (2022). Enhanced adsorptional-photocatalytic degradation of chloramphenicol by reduced graphene oxide–zinc oxide nanocomposite. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 17054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jaihindh, D. P., Chen, C.-C., & Fu, Y.-P. (2018). Reduced graphene oxide-supported Ag-loaded Fe-doped TiO2 for the degradation mechanism of methylene blue and its electrochemical properties. RSC Advances, 8, 6079–6091. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2012). Indian standard: Drinking water — Specification (2nd revision) (IS 10500:2012). BIS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hoffmann, M. R., Martin, S. T., Choi, W., & Bahnemann, D. W. (1995). Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chemical Reviews, 95(1), 69–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mills, A., & Le Hunte, S. (1997). An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 108(1), 1–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Shabil Sha, M., Anwar, H., Musthafa, F. N., Al-Lohedan, H., Alfarwati, S., Rajabathar, J. R., Alahmad, J. K., Cabibihan, J.-J., Karnan, M., & Sadasivuni, K. K. (2024). Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes using reduced graphene oxide (rGO). Scientific Reports, 14, Article 3608. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Er Siong, V. L., Lee, K. M., Juan, J. C., Lai, C. W., Tai, X. H., & Khe, C. S. (2019). Removal of methylene blue dye by solvothermally reduced graphene oxide: A metal-free adsorption and photodegradation method. RSC Advances, 9, 37686–37695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Parthipan, P., Cheng, L., Rajasekar, A., Govarthanan, M., & Subramania, A. (2021). Biologically reduced graphene oxide as a green and easily available photocatalyst for degradation of organic dyes. Environmental Research, 196, Article 110983. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Yu, L., Xu, W., Liu, H., & Bao, Y. (2022). Titanium dioxide–reduced graphene oxide composites for photocatalytic degradation of dyes in water. Catalysts, 12(11), Article 1340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ziyaadini, M., & Ghashang, M. (2021). Sunlight-induced photocatalytic degradation of indigo carmine using Bi5Ti3FeO15 layered structure. Optik, 228, Article 166207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wang, J., Zhu, H., Hurren, C., Zhao, J., Pakdel, E., Li, Z., & Wang, X. (2015). Degradation of organic dyes by P25-reduced graphene oxide: Influence of inorganic salts and surfactants. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(2), 1437–1443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Al-Ansari, S. H., Gomaa, H., Abdel-Rahim, R. D., Ali, G. A. M., & Nagiub, A. M. (2024). Recycled gold-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of crystal violet. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 4386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles