When Do Organizational Capability Foster Sustainable Entrepreneurship? Evidence from Artificial Intelligence Effects Among Smes in an Emerging Economy

Purpose: The study examined the technology-contingent effects of organizational capability on Sustainable Entrepreneurship (SE) among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Specifically, it investigated how strategic agility and adaptive capability influence SE and how artificial intelligence (AI) adoption plays a mediating role in this relationship.
Design/Methodology: The study adopted a cross-sectional survey research design and was grounded in the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT). Using Taro Yamane’s formula, a sample size of 382 was determined from a population of 8,395 registered SMEs in Lagos State, Nigeria; 311 valid responses were analyzed using a structured questionnaire. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS 23 was employed for data analysis. Four hypotheses were formulated and tested.
Findings: The results revealed that both strategic agility and adaptive capability significantly influence SE, and their combined effect strengthens sustainable entrepreneurial outcomes. Notably, artificial intelligence adoption partially mediated the relationship between organizational capabilities and SE, indicating that AI serves as a technological enabler that enhances the translation of internal capabilities into sustainable outcomes.
Originality/Value: This study advances sustainable entrepreneurship literature by introducing a technology-contingent capability perspective, demonstrating that artificial intelligence functions as a mediating mechanism linking organizational capabilities to sustainability outcomes. In response to recent calls for more process-oriented and digitally grounded explanations of sustainability in entrepreneurship, the study extends RBV and DCT by positioning AI not merely as a technological tool but as a strategic transformation mechanism in SMEs.

Artificial intelligence, Dynamic capabilities, SMEs, Sustainable entrepreneurship

1. Akter, S., Michael, K., Uddin, M. R., McCarthy, G., and Rahman, M. (2022). Transforming business using digital innovations: the application of AI, blockchain, cloud and data analytics. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), 7-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Dhaafri, H. S., and Alosani, M. S. (2026). The role of leadership, continuous improvement and benchmarking on organizational performance: the mediating mechanism of EOC. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 33(1), 264-285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Dhaafri, H., and Alosani, M. S. (2022). Role of leadership, strategic planning and entrepreneurial organizational culture towards achieving organizational excellence: evidence from public sector using SEM. Measuring Business Excellence, 26(3), 378-396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alharbi, I. B., Jamil, R., Mahmood, N. H. N., and Shaharoun, A. M. (2023). Transformational leadership’s impact on organizational innovation: The mediating role of management control system. Global Business Review, 24(6), 1418-1433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ametepe, P. K., Banwo, A. O., and Arilesere, M. S. (2023). Amoral behavior, control climate, job insecurity and fraudulent intentions among bank employees. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(4), 781-803. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ametepe, P. K., Obasi, N. P., Nnaji, C. F., & Otuaga, E. U. (2025). Green human resources management and corporate sustainability: a mediating role of leader support in the oil and gas industry. IIMT Journal of Management, 2(2), 233-257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arroyabe, M. F., Arranz, C. F., De Arroyabe, I. F., and de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2024). Analyzing AI adoption in European SMEs: A study of digital capabilities, innovation, and external environment. Technology in Society, 79, 102733. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr, D. J., and Wright, M. (2021). Resource-based theory and the value creation framework. Journal of management, 47(7), 1936-1955. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bate, A. F., and Pittaway, L. (2024). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation on SME business performance in Ethiopia: The configurational approach. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 33(3), 439-484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Beliaeva, T., Ferasso, M., Kraus, S., and Damke, E. J. (2020). Dynamics of digital entrepreneurship and the innovation ecosystem: A multilevel perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 26(2), 266-284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Beuren, I. M., dos Santos, V., and Theiss, V. (2022). Organizational resilience, job satisfaction and business performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(6), 2262-2279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bocken, N. M., and Geradts, T. H. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 53(4), 101950. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Corrales-Estrada, A. M., Gómez-Santos, L. L., Bernal-Torres, C. A., and Rodriguez-López, J. E. (2021). Sustainability and resilience organizational capabilities to enhance business continuity management: A literature review. Sustainability, 13(15), 8196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Doz, Y. L., and Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 370-382. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business research, 13(1), 215-246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Duong, C. D. (2025). Artificial intelligence innovation, innovation niches and entrepreneurial performance: the curvilinear role of open innovation. Business Process Management Journal, 1-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dwivedi, A., and Paul, S. K. (2022). A framework for digital supply chains in the era of circular economy: Implications on environmental sustainability. Business strategy and the environment, 31(4), 1249-1274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fan, M., Soomro, S., Soomro, S., Sohu, J. M., Shah, S. B., and Shaikh, S. N. (2026). The human side of AI adoption: exploring technostress, training and employee well-being in manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 37(2), 273-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fatma, C. H. E. R. I. F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Adoption and the Performance of Tunisian SMEs: The Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation. International Journal Of Applied Management And Economics, 2(16), 239-260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., and Hughes, M. (2022). Prevailing theoretical approaches predicting sustainable business models: A systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3), 790-813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gast, J., Gundolf, K., and Cesinger, B. (2017). Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. Journal of cleaner production, 147, 44-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ghobakhloo, M. (2020). Determinants of information and digital technology implementation for smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 58(8), 2384-2405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hair, J. F., Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., and Ringle, C. M. (2021). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. He, H., and Harris, L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of business research, 116, 176-182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hejazi, M. T. (2021). Effect of supply chain resilience on organizational performance through knowledge sharing. Revista geintec-gestao inovacao e tecnologias, 11(4), 4764-4771. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Inigo, E. A., Albareda, L., and Ritala, P. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Exploring evolutionary and radical approaches through dynamic capabilities. Industry and innovation, 24(5), 515-542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Foropon, C., and Filho, M. G. (2019). When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionize the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The Role of Human Resource Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Joulal, N., and Messaoudi, A. (2024). From disruption to continuity: Understanding organizational resilience strategies in the face of technological change. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 11(9), 275-282. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kanti, P. S., Sadia, R., and Suchismita, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence adoption in supply chain risk management: Scale development and validation. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science-Economics and Business Administration, 12(2), 15-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kaouache, D. E., Amara, C., Chatter, C., and Kaouache, A. (2024). The effect of individual entrepreneurial orientation on entrepreneurial intention among university students. Business Ethics and Leadership, 8(2), 63-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kraus, S., Breier, M., and Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023-1042. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., and Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human resource management review, 21(3), 243-255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lu, Y., and K.(Ram) Ramamurthy. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS quarterly, 931-954. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mamun, M. A. A., Mahmud, M. H., Islam, M. T., Gomes, K., Rana, M. R. I., and Tadesse, M. G. (2025, July). Towards sustainability: a bibliometric study on advances in textile research. In Sustainability Nexus Forum (Vol. 33, No. 1, p. 8). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mansouri, M., Malainine, C., Souti, H., and Cadimi, I. (2022). Dynamic capabilities, competitiveness and performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mokline, B., and Ben Abdallah, M. A. (2021). Organizational resilience as response to a crisis: Case of COVID-19 crisis. Continuity and Resilience Review, 3(3), 232-247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Osiyevskyy, O., and Dewald, J. (2015). Explorative versus exploitative business model change: the cognitive antecedents of firm‐level responses to disruptive innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1), 58-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Raisch, S., and Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of management review, 46(1), 192-210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Renzl, B., Mahringer, C., Rost, M., and Scheible, L. (2021). Organizational agility: Current challenges and future opportunities. Journal of Capabilitys, Strategy and Management, 11, 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Reuther, K., Dahle, Y., Schmidt, C., and Schösser, F. (2023). Motivational facets of sustainable entrepreneurship: A systematic review and future research agenda. Sustainability, 15(3), 2272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Santiago, F., Zurita, A. H., and Pollak, R. (2025). Building foundational capabilities for the digitalisation of manufacturing in Africa and Latin America. In Building Digital Technological Capabilities (pp. 97-121). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G., and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization and Environment, 29(1), 3-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Shepherd, D. A., and Patzelt, H. (2017). Trailblazing in entrepreneurship: Creating new paths for understanding the field. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 51(1), 40-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Teece, D. J. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Review, 1(2), 233-253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Terchila, S. (2025). The Future of Entrepreneurship: Strategic Approaches for Business Adaptation in a Changing Global Environment. From Risks to Opportunities. Studies in Business and Economics, 20(1), 263-280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Tessema, W. K., and Birhane, L. A. (2024). The Relationship of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance in the Developing Country Context: The Case of Firms in Ethiopia. In Economic Growth and Development in the Tropics (pp. 64-82). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Van Der Vegt, G. S., Essens, P., Wahlström, M., and George, G. (2015). Managing risk and resilience. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 971-980. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing digital transformation, 13-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Warner, K. S., and Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long range planning, 52(3), 326-349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Weick, K. E., and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2015). Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world. John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Xiong, F., Li, S., Zhang, W., and Xu, N. (2025). Individuals’ capacity to innovate: a literature review of individual absorptive capacity. Innovation, 27(4), 564-584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Xiong, S., Paulraj, A., Dai, J., and Irawan, C. A. (2025). Digital integration capability asymmetry and buyer product innovation: the contingent roles of environmental dynamism and innovative climate. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 45(3), 756-782. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Yulianto, H. (2024). An Exploratory Review of Deep Learning Methods in Education. Moderasi: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 5(2), 144-157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area