Why Management Control Systems Fail or Succeed: A Legitimacy-Based Process Explanation of Financial Performance

In increasingly complex and uncertain environments, where activities are project-based, organisations rely on management control systems (MCS) to support decision-making and improve performance. However, their effectiveness cannot be explained solely by their technical design. This study examines the role of MCS legitimacy as a key factor in reducing organisational uncertainty and improving coordination, thereby contributing to enhanced financial performance. Drawing on legitimacy theory, a conceptual model is developed, establishing a link between MCS legitimacy, uncertainty reduction, coordination and performance. The empirical analysis is based on data collected from 175 large construction firms in Morocco. Using regression and mediation analyses, the results show that the perceived legitimacy of MCS significantly reduces uncertainty and enhances coordination among organisational actors. In turn, better coordination leads to improved financial performance. The results also indicate that legitimacy influences performance indirectly through these intermediary mechanisms. This study contributes to the literature by offering a more comprehensive understanding of how management control systems operate in complex environments. It highlights the importance of legitimacy as a practical and managerial lever for improving organisational effectiveness in project management contexts.

Management control systems; Legitimacy; Organisational uncertainty

1. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1506/VJR6-RP75-7GUX-XH0X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bedford, D. S. (2020). Conceptualising management control systems as a package. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 86, 101159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bedford, D. S., & Malmi, T. (2015). Configurations of control. Management Accounting Research, 27, 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organisational context. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Davila, A. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4–5), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00034-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., & Suchman, M. C. (2017). Organizational legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984). Measuring organisational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Haack, P., Sieweke, J., & Wessel, L. (2021). Microfoundations of organisational legitimacy. Academy of Management Journal, 64(6), 1811–1838. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.1067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Henri, J.-F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Möller, K., Schäffer, U., & Verbeeten, F. (2023). Digitalisation and management control systems. Journal of Management Control, 34, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-023-00340-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mundy, J. (2010). Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of MCS. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(5), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tessier, S., & Otley, D. (2012). A conceptual development of management control. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Winch, G. M. (2010). Managing construction projects (2nd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Responsible Leadership, Digital Transformation Capability, and Sustainability Performance in Business and Higher Education Institutions
• Navigating the Adverse Strategies in Managing Hostile, Resistant and Disruptive Community Project Stakeholders in Nairobi County, Kenya.
• An Empirical Study of Impact of Digital Marketing Frauds on Customers’ Online Buying Behaviour in Madhya Pradesh
• Modelling Bim–Circular Economy Integration for Construction Waste Minimisation in Malaysia: A Pls-Sem Approach
• The Challenge of Integrating Innovative Thinking into Traditional Organizational Cultures: Examining Workplace Behavioral Culture, Accountability, and Operational Effectiveness