Work-Life Balance and Employee Performance Outcomes in Higher Education Institutions in Metro Manila

This study examined the relationship between work-life balance and employee performance outcomes in selected Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Metro Manila, focusing on school administrators, faculty, and non-academic staff. Specifically, it analyzed how workload distribution, institutional support, and organizational practices influence employee well-being and performance, while identifying key workplace challenges. A mixed-methods research design was employed, integrating quantitative data from structured surveys (n = 192) and qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews.
Findings revealed that employees generally perceive work-life balance and employee performance outcomes as favorable, particularly in terms of workload manageability, resource adequacy, and task timeliness. However, qualitative results highlighted the presence of resilient professionalism, wherein employees maintain high levels of performance despite workload pressures, limited flexibility, and inconsistent supervisory support. Faculty members, in particular, reported greater exposure to role overload and work-life balance challenges.
Inferential analysis indicated a moderate, statistically significant positive relationship between work-life balance and employee performance outcomes (r = 0.503, p < .0001). Despite these positive perceptions, persistent challenges were identified, including excessive workload, limited scheduling flexibility, uneven supervisory support, and operational inefficiencies.
These findings suggest that performance outcomes are sustained through adaptive and compensatory mechanisms rather than optimal working conditions. Therefore, HEIs are encouraged to implement strategic interventions such as workload realignment, flexible work arrangements, strengthened supervisory practices, and institutionalized work-life balance policies to enhance employee well-being and sustain organizational performance.

Work-life balance, employee performance outcomes, higher education institutions

1. Allen, T. D., Merlo, K., Lawrence, R. C., Slutsky, J., & Gray, C. E. (2021). Boundary management and work–nonwork balance while working from home. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ariasari, N. W., & Tjahjono, H. K. (2024). Work–life balance, organizational commitment, and employee performance: Evidence from the education sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(2), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2022-0267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beauregard, T. A., & Henry, L. C. (2009). Making the link between work–life balance practices and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brough, P., Timms, C., O’Driscoll, M. P., Kalliath, T., Siu, O. L., Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2014). Work–life balance: A longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(19), 2724–2744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.878047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Budhwar, P., Malik, A., De Silva, M. T., & Saini, D. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence–challenged human resource management practices and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100868 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2021). The modeling and assessment of work performance: Building theory, improving measurement, and enhancing impact. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 45, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09869-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De Guzman, M. T., Santos, M. A. P., & Lorenzo, J. A. (2022). Lived experiences of work–life balance among academic leaders in Philippine higher education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09704-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Deery, M., & Jago, L. (2022). Revisiting talent management, work–life balance, and retention strategies in service industries. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2020-1206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fan, X., Liu, Y., Wang, M., & Wang, L. (2023). The impact of work–life balance on employee productivity: The moderating role of organizational support. Sustainability, 15(4), 3210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. García-González, J., Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Bañón-Gomis, A. J. (2023). Work–life balance and engagement outcomes in employees: Exploring the role of organizational support. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Sune, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85, 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Inceoglu, I., Segers, J., & Bartram, T. (2022). Leadership behaviors and employee well-being in the context of organizational change. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 27(2), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Inegbedion, H. (2024). Work–life balance and employee performance in emerging economies: The role of institutional support. Employee Relations, 46(1), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2023-0125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jackson, L. T., & Fransman, E. I. (2013). Employee work–life balance outcomes: The role of supervisory support and organizational support. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(6), 1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.709208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., & Tranby, E. (2010). Changing workplaces to reduce work–family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review, 75(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411400056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kossek, E. E., & Perrigino, M. B. (2022). Resilience and work–life balance in the new world of work: Implications for human resource management. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Maraqa, M., Alshawabkeh, K., & Al-Faouri, R. (2025). Work–life balance and organizational performance: The mediating role of employee engagement. Management Research Review, 48(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2024-0897 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2023). Well-being costs of technology use during remote working: An investigation using the job demands–resources model. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. H., & Pham, T. T. (2023). Work–life balance and job performance among academic staff: The mediating role of work engagement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09745-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Pateña, A. B. (2024). Work–life balance and teaching performance among higher education faculty in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education, 98(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pulakos, E. D., Hanson, R. M., Arad, S., & Moye, N. (2022). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential approach for complex behavior change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Salleh, M. R., & Abas, M. K. (2025). Work–life balance practices and employee productivity in higher education institutions. Journal of Educational Administration, 63(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2024-0187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shin, Y., & Jung, J. (2023). Work–life balance and employee well-being in organizational contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Siem Tran Thi, S., Ho Thi Thao Nguyen, H. T., & Phan Tan Luc, P. (2025). Work–life balance in higher education: A review based on bibliographic coupling analysis. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Znidarsic, J., & Maric, M. (2021). Relationships between work–family balance, job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and work engagement among higher education lecturers. Organizacija, 54(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study