Work World of the Philippine National Police Scene of the Crime Operatives (PNP-SOCO): A Qualitative Analysis

Authors

Yvonne Mae Inoc Lagura

University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue/ College of Criminology (Philippines)

Paulino V. Pioquinto

University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue/ College of Criminology (Philippines)

Grayfield B Bajao

University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue/ College of Criminology (Philippines)

Ronalyn B Daño

University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue/ College of Criminology (Philippines)

Guilbert Mansueto

University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue/ College of Criminology (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11030017

Subject Category: Criminology

Volume/Issue: 11/3 | Page No: 166-177

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-12

Accepted: 2026-03-18

Published: 2026-03-28

Abstract

This study explored the work world of the Philippine National Police Scene of the Crime Operatives (PNP-SOCO). Specifically, this study sought to answer the following: the positive and negative experiences of the informants, addressing the challenges encountered during the performance of their duties and the aspiration of the informants to improve the quality of RFU7-SOCO. This study employs a qualitative research design, utilizing a phenomenological approach. This inquiry utilizes ten (10) informants from the Regional Forensic 7 and members of the SOCO with at least 5 years of experience. Using a validated interview guide with open-ended questions prepared by the researcher, the informants were all interviewed individually. Colaizzi’s thematic analysis was employed to analyze the collected data.
Three themes summarized the positive experiences of the informants. These were: Preparedness and Role Clarity Boost Confidence and Effectiveness, Team Coordination and Communication Enhance Operational Success and Evidence Recovery Skills Directly Impact Investigation Outcomes. As to the negative experiences, the themes revealed were: Inadequate Crime Scene Management and Logistics, Evidence Contamination and Improper Collection and Need for Enhanced Availability of Standard Comparison Materials for Forensic Examination. To address the challenges encountered as SOCO Members in the performance of their duties three themes were created: Professionalism, Integrity, and Faith in Handling, Effective Communication, Collaboration and Coordination and Adaptive Coping and Problem-Solving Strategies. And three emergent theme to express the aspiration of the informants to improve their performance as SOCO member, to wit: Strengthening Workforce and Resource Capacity, Enhancing Training Programs and Standards, and Upholding and Improving Standards of Practices.
The researcher advocates a qualitative exploration of the lived realities of Scene of the Crime Operatives (SOCOs) deployed to Regional Forensic Unit 7. This study aims to deliver a comprehensive examination of the distinct obstacles encountered in crime scene processing, evidence retrieval, and meticulous documentation. By closely analyzing these experiences, the study may provide actionable recommendations addressing the operational, structural, and psychological dimensions of their roles. Recognizing these obstacles could improve investigative protocols, safeguard the authenticity of evidence, and ultimately facilitate the effective prosecution of cases.

Keywords

Work World, Scene of the Crime Operatives, Phenomenology

Downloads

References

1. Books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fisher, B. A. J., & Fisher, D. R. (2012). Techniques of crime scene investigation (8th ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Horswell, J. (Ed.). (2016). The practice of crime scene investigation (2nd ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Houck, M. M., & Siegel, J. A. (2015). Fundamentals of forensic science (3rd ed.). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Inman, K., & Rudin, N. (2001). Principles and practice of criminalistics: The profession of forensic science. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. James, S. H., Nordby, J. J., & Bell, S. (2014). Forensic science: An introduction to scientific and investigative techniques (4th ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Moustakas, C. (2018). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Saferstein, R. (2020). Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science (12th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2019). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Journal Articles [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Adams, L., & Smith, J. (2019). Investigator experiences and psychological impact in the role of scene of the crime operatives (SOCO): A global perspective. International Journal of Forensic Psychology, 25(3), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Alcantara, B. T., & Reyes, D. P. (2022). Forensic evidence integrity issues in urban and rural crime scenes. Philippine Journal of Forensic Science, 5(1), 66–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Alviz, J. C., & De Guia, D. (2019). Crime scene processing practices of the Philippine National Police scene of the crime operatives: Basis for enhancement. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 21(4), 670–686. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Bartolome, M. C., & Reyes, E. F. (2022). Organizational culture and performance outcomes in forensic units: A comparative analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67(3), 456–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Bartolome, M. C., & Santos, R. D. (2020). Exploring the challenges faced by Philippine National Police scene of the crime operatives: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Criminal Investigation, 8(2), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Bautista, C. L., & De Jesus, M. P. (2021). Resilience and professional accuracy in forensic fieldwork: A quantitative study. Philippine Journal of Criminology and Psychology, 13(1), 51–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Beltran, M. R., Vega, A., & Cruz, L. (2023). Reference data gaps in forensic identification: A field study. Journal of Forensic Identification, 73(1), 30–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Brown, A., & Garcia, M. (2020). Resilience training programs in law enforcement: A comparative analysis. Journal of Police Science & Management, 22(4), 789–805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Brown, A., et al. (2021). The influence of leadership styles on psychological resilience among forensic teams: A comparative analysis. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 43(4), 567–583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Brown, R., et al. (2019). Enhancing resilience and coping strategies among scene of the crime operatives worldwide: Best practices and recommendations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 201–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Brown, R., et al. (2020). Resource allocation and utilization in scene of the crime operatives: A global perspective. Forensic Science International, 35(4), 201–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Chen, L., et al. (2019). Capacity building and training needs for scene of the crime operatives in Asian countries. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 22(4), 189–201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Chen, L., et al. (2021). Mental health issues among scene of the crime operatives in Asian countries: A survey study. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 18(2), 90–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Chen, L., Wang, H., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Scenario-based training in forensic education. Forensic Training Journal, 5(1), 42–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Chen, W., et al. (2019). Training needs assessment and skill enhancement aspirations among crime scene investigators in Asian nations. Journal of Asian Police Studies, 22(3), 189–201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Chen, W., et al. (2020). Occupational stress and coping strategies among scene of the crime operatives worldwide: A comparative study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 201–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Cortez, A. R., & Javier, M. C. (2021). Enhancing forensic success through intra-agency collaboration. Southeast Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(1), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Cruz, J., & Hernandez, L. (2019). Understanding organizational culture in a police department: A qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 21(3), 520–535. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Cruz, M., et al. (2019). Modernization initiatives in Philippine scene of the crime operatives: A case study. Journal of Philippine Studies, 25(3), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Cruz, N., et al. (2018). Impact of work environment on investigator experiences: Perspectives from scene of the crime operatives in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. David, R., & Torres, J. (2022). Upholding integrity in forensic investigations: Challenges and lessons. Philippine Journal of Criminal Ethics, 10(1), 35–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. De Guzman, K. R., & Cruz, J. A. (2023). Capacity-building in Philippine forensic services. Asia-Pacific Journal of Criminal Science, 15(1), 85–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Del Rosario, L. M., & Reyes, E. F. (2022). Strengthening forensic capabilities: Insights from Philippine National Police scene of the crime operatives. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67(1), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Dela Cruz, M., & Santos, R. (2018). Aspirations for professional growth among crime scene investigators in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Criminology, 12(2), 78–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Dlamini, P., & Ntuli, S. (2022). Evaluating logistical support in rural forensic investigations. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies, 14(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Garcia, J., & Reyes, E. (2018). Understanding organizational culture in law enforcement agencies: Insights from the Philippines. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 20(3), 450–465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Garcia, L., & Tan, A. (2020). Digital transformation in forensic investigations: The case of Regional Forensic Unit 7. Journal of Philippine Legal Technology, 8(3), 201–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Giorgi, A. (2021). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In A. Giorgi, L. Fischer, & E. Geller (Eds.), Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology (Vol. 5). Duquesne University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. McFarlane, A. C., & Bryant, R. A. (2007). Post-traumatic stress disorder in occupational settings. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 247–269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Mejia, R. (2024). Advancing forensic science modernization in the Philippine National Police. Philippine Journal of Criminal Justice, 18(1), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Papazoglou, K., & Andersen, J. P. (2014). A guide to utilizing police training as a tool to promote resilience and improve health outcomes. Traumatology, 20(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. BMJ, 320(7237), 768–770. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Violanti, J. M., Owens, S. L., McCanlies, E., Fekedulegn, D., & Andrew, M. E. (2017). Law enforcement suicide: A review. Policing: An International Journal, 40(4), 642–656. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Internet / Government Sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Cebu Daily News. (2025, January 15). Central Visayas crime rate drops by 66 percent. Cebu Daily News. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2022). Annual accomplishment report on peace and order. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO/IEC 17020: Conformity assessment Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. National Police Commission. (2023). Rules and regulations governing forensic personnel accreditation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Philippine National Police. (2023). PNP forensic group manual on crime scene investigation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles