Understanding the Attitudes and Perceptions of Young People with a Migration Background: An Appraisal of Youth Development Policies

Young people represent a vital demographic in shaping the social, economic, and political fabric of societies. Their participation is central to global and regional policy frameworks, including the European Union Youth Strategy (2019–2027), which emphasizes empowerment, protection, and integration of young migrants and refugees. In Germany, national and sub-national policies similarly prioritize youth engagement. However, young people with a migration background continue to face barriers that limit their effective participation. This study explores their levels of engagement, knowledge, and attitudes toward youth policy initiatives. A qualitative research design was employed using focus group discussions with participants aged 12–21 years, of African, Arabian, and Eastern European descent. Snowball sampling was used for recruitment. Data were analyzed through an inductive meta-aggregation approach. Results reveal persistent gaps in policy effectiveness for migrant-background youth, including limited awareness of youth policies and decision-making processes, political apathy, racism, Islamophobia, perceived exclusion of minority groups, unequal valuation of migrants by race/ethnicity, identity crises, and lack of safe spaces. Weaknesses in policy communication and information flow were also evident. While youth development policies in Germany are innovative, they remain insufficiently inclusive of young people with a migrant background, particularly in policy design and implementation.

Youth Policies, Young people with a migration background

1. The United Nations. Report of the Advisory Committee for the International Youth Year. A/36/215, 2019, annex. https://www.un.org/development/desa/youth/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2019/08/ WYP201910-Key-Messages_GZ_8AUG19.pdf (Accessed Dec. 19, 2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP. Youth as Partners for the Implementing the SDGs. January 2017. New York. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/ zskgke326/files/publications/ Fast%20Facts%20-%20Youth%20&%20SDGs_2017-January_final.pdf. Accessed December 23, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. European Union. Resolution 2018/C 456/01. The European Union Youth Strategy 2019-2027. Dec. 18, 2018. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C .2018.456.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AC%3A2018%3A456%3AFULL [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. United Nations. Youth 2030: The UN Youth Strategy. 2018. https://www.un.org/youthenvoy/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/18-00080_UN-Youth-Strategy_Web.pdf ((Accessed Dec. 23. 2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. UNICEF. Empowering children and youth affected by migration to become powerful agents of change. Sept. 26, 2022. https://www.unicef.org/thailand/blog/empowering-children-and-youth-affected-migration-become-powerful-agents-change (Accessed Dec. 11, 2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anschütz, Sarah. Extraordinary everydayness: Young people's affective engagements with the country of origin through digital media and transnational mobility. Global Networks, 2022: 22:3, pages 483-498. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. UNICEF. Migration and Youth: Challenges and Opportunities, Key Messages and Policy Recommendations. Edited by Jeronimo Cortina, Patrick Taran and Alison Raphael on behalf of the Global Migration Group. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000227720. Accessed December 23, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ). In gemeinsamer Verantwortung: Politik für, mit und von Jugend: Die Jugendstrategie der Bundesregierung. Artikelnummer 5FL475. Juni, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Kinder- und Jugendhilfe e. V. (AGJ). Youth Appropriate Municipalities (2015 0 2018). Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ). First published in August 2018. Translation (English) published in March 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. LJHA Beschluss Nummer 3/15 vom 16. März 2015. Landesjugendförderplan 2017 bis 2021. https://bildung.thueringen.de/fileadmin/jugend/jugendpolitik/landesjugendforderplan_2017_2021_web.pdf (Accessed Dec. 11, 2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Goodman, Leo A. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Mar., 1961), pp. 148-170 (23 pages) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Saini, Michael, and Aron Shlonsky, 'Methods for Aggregating, Integrating, and Interpreting Qualitative Research', Systematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research, Pocket Guides to Social Work Research Methods, 2012; online edn, Oxford Academic, 24 May 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387216.003.0002 (accessed Aug. 5, 2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Guide to qualitative evidence synthesis: evidence-informed policymaking using research in the EVIPNET framework. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Florczak K. L. (2018). Qualitative synthesis: Ontological care please. Nursing Science Quarterly, 31(3), 220-223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Schütz, A. (1962). The Problem of Social Reality: Collected Papers I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sandelowski M, Barrosso J. Handbook for Synthesising Qualitative Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Barker K. Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 21;14:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Robert Bosch Stiftung (2024). Initiative #IchStehAuf: Schools Set an Example for Democracy and Diversity. April 16, 2024 https://www.bosch-stiftung.de/en/storys/schools-set-example-democracy-and-diversity. Accessed December 19, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Miera, Frauke (2007). German Education Policy and the Challenge of Migration. Paper prepared for the EMILIE project, WP3, Deliverable D4, Final version. EUV Frankfurt (Oder). https://migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2009-01/docl_6975_328629276.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Georgi, Viola B. and Karakaşoğlu, Yasemin (eds)., Allgemeinbildende Schulen in der Migrationsgesellschaft. Diversitätssensible Ansätze und Perspektiven [General Education Schools in the Migration Society. Diversity-Sensitive Approaches and Perspectives] (Kohlhammer, 2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Georgi, Viola B. Migration & the Quest for Educational Equity in Germany. Daedalus, the Journal of the American Journal of Arts and Sciences. 153 (4), Fall 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar