Reading Motivation Vs Reading Comprehension of Filipino ESL Learners in the Public Schools: Its Correlation to Phi-IRI Reading Results

Authors

Marieta Acibar Dar

Curriculum Implementation Division, Department of Education-Schools Division of Manila (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000102

Subject Category: English Literature

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 1195-1205

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-20

Accepted: 2025-10-27

Published: 2025-11-05

Abstract

A considerable number of studies concerning topics on reading comprehension were conducted significantly; however, less attention was focused on metacognitive motivation of students, particularly among the public secondary schools in the Philippines, whose primary language for communication is Filipino or Tagalog, but are being taught in English as the medium of instruction in most of their basic core subjects. These students are in a crucial transition period from junior high school to senior high school. The present study aims to investigate the current reading level of Filipino ESL learners in the Junior High School who took the Grade 7 Phil-IRI test and how it relates to their metacognitive reading motivation. A total of 229 participants were randomly selected from junior high schools in the Schools Division of Manila. Results reveal that the majority of high school students belong to the instructional level. This explains that, with follow-up on high-quality instructions, students can achieve optimal performance in their studies. Interestingly, data yielded a very significant relationship between the results of the Phil-IRI reading test and the Metacognitive Awareness Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI). This means that students who perform well in the Phil-IRI are likely to be highly motivated in their metacognitive strategies when reading academic materials. The pedagogical implications of the study suggest that language teachers should offer more than just reading instruction; learners must be strongly motivated to read, and the teachers should ensure this motivation.

Keywords

Phil-IRI, Reading, Metacognition, Motivation

Downloads

References

1. Awe, B.M. (2014). Relationship between reading attitudes and reading comprehension performance of secondary school students in Kwara State, Nigeria. Retrieved https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a542/8255ac2f085b2832c6c15da597dc6a8867a6.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bureau of Elementary Education, (2009). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory, Manual and User’s Guide. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/39879719/Phil-IRI-Manual-and-User-s-Guide-for-School-Users-Ver-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Burkins J.M. & Croft, M.M., (2010) From preventing misguided reading: New strategies for guided reading. International Reading Association (IRA). Retrieved from http://literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/bonus-materials/828-chapter-2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cicerchia, M. (2016, December 20). 3 common reading problems for students. [Web blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.readandspell.com/us/common-reading-problems [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davis, P., & Pearse, E. (2002). Success in English Teaching. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article-pdf/56/4/424/1142878/560424.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. De Dios, A. (2013), Philippine Basic Education. The National Achievement Test in the Philippines.[Web blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.philippinesbasiceducation.us/2013/07/the-national-achievement-test-in.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Education (2016). Official Gazette: General Appropriations Act 2016, 112(1). Retrieved from https://www.dbm.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/GAA/GAA2017/VolumeII/DEPED/DEPED.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Estacio, M.J., (2013). Bilingual readers’ metacognitive strategies as predictors of reading comprehension. Philippine ESL Journal. Retrieved from https://www.philippine-esl-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/V10-A7.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gomez Laich, M.P., & Tuero, S.B. (2009). Reading for meaning vs. Reading plus vocabulary learning activities: which leads to more effective vocabulary acquisition? XXXIV In Fernandez, Usabiaga, Armendariz, Boetsch, Soler, Lirusso & Elbat (Eds.) FAAPI Conference Proceedings of the Teachers in Action. Making the latest trends work in the classroom. Retrieved from www.faapi.org.ar/ downloads/ FAAPI2009.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Guthrie, J.T., Bennett, L.& McGough, K. (1994). Motivations for reading. Retrieved from http://www.readingrockets.org/article/motivations-reading. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Krashen, S.D. (1989).We acquire vocabulary and spelling and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis, Modern Language Journal, 73 (4), 440-464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist,57. 705-717. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Magogwe, J.M. (2013). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies of University Botswana English as Second Language students of different academic reading proficiencies. Reading and Writing 4(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/rw.v4i1.29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mart, Ç. (2012). Developing speaking skills through reading. International Journal of English Linguistics; 2(6). doi:10.5539/ijel.v2n6p91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mokhtari, K. & Reichard C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2). 249-259.doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mori, S. (2002). Redefining motivation to read in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign language. 14(2), 91. Retrieved from https://www.tuj.ac.jp/tesol/publications/working-papers/vol-14/mori.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Olusola, O. (2016). Improving language proficiency and general knowledge: A case for free voluntary reading. International Journal of English Language Teaching 4(2). Retrieved from http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Improving-Language-Proficiency-and-General-Knowledge2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Philippine Education for All Review Report, (2015).Ten-point Education Agenda. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002303/230331e.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Philippine Informal Reading Inventory Manual. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/64933387/The-Philippine-Informal-Reading-Inventory [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Philstar Global (2006). Retrieved from https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/health-and-family/2010/03/02/553720/how-do-filipino-students-rate-reading#qfugEPxTZLuwy3F0.99 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pretorius, E. (2010). What they can’t read will hurt them: Reading and academic. Innovation. ukzn.ac.za/innovationprofs/No21Pp33-41pretorius.(pdf.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language.Longman Inc. New York: United States of America [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Schunk, D.H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Tubadeza, K.M., & Rosero, E,V. (2015)., New Metro Manila P481 minimum pay far from P1,088 family living wage-IBON Foundation. GMA News Online. Retrieved from http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/money/content/455590/new-metro-manila-p481-minimum-pay-far-from-p1-088-family-living-wage-ibon-foundation/story/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wallot, S., O’Brien, B., Haussmann A., Kloos, H., & Lyby, M.,(2014). The role of time complexity and reading speed in text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 40 (6),1745-1765, :doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles