Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study
Authors
Asher Kaye College and Achva College (Israel)
Asher Kaye College and Achva College (Israel)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000179
Subject Category: Sociology
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 2177-2190
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-08-26
Accepted: 2025-09-02
Published: 2025-11-06
Abstract
This article explores the concept of motherhood and social inclusion in psychological and social contexts in a case study of a mother raising a child with special needs (ASD). The psychological context refers to the emotional “container” that provides support and protection for both mother and child. The social context refers to the reduction of barriers that enable participation, engagement, and acceptance within a new community.
Adopting a self-narrative approach, the study employs deductive content analysis using bricolage methods in content analysis and the discussion (Kincheloe et al., 2011; Ben-Asher, 2021). The analysis revealed three key insights from content analysis results:
the mother’s ability to include her son is grounded in her capability to self-acceptance;
Self-acceptance here is shaped by external social norms and personal (inner) traits, that influenced the mother's sense of belonging and integration into a new community;
Personality traits, particularly self-criticism, was found to be significant in shaping experiences of motherhood containment and social inclusion.
Keywords
containment, social inclusion, self-acceptance, motherhood
Downloads
References
1. Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting Stress Index (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adams, M.& Almonte, A. (2022). First Time Mothers: Definition of a ‘Good’ Mother, American Journal of Qualitative Research 2022, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 195-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Allen, K.A., Kern, M.L., Rozek, C.S., McInereney, D., & Slavich, G.M., (2021). Belonging: A Review of Conceptual Issues, an Integrative Framework, and Directions for Future Research. Aust J Psychol. 2021 Mar 10;73(1):87-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Allman, D. (2013). The sociology of social inclusion. SAGE Open, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012471957 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Barlow, C. A., & Cairns, K.V. (1997).Mothering as a Psychological Experience: A Grounded Theory Exploration. Canadian Journal of Counselling, Vol. 31, 232-247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ben-Asher, S. (2021). Bricolage pedagogy: Learning as a new sequence of experimenting and inquiry (pp. 187- 200). Shvilim book. MOFET Institute. [Hebrew] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Berry, K. S. (2004). Feedback looping for increasing complexity. In J. L. Kincheloe & K. S. Berry (Eds.), Rigour and complexity in educational research: Conceptualizing the bricolage (pp. 128–146). Maidenhead Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bion, W.R. (1962). Learning from experience. Karnac Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Bion, W. R. (1967). Second thoughts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429479809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Owney Brewer, M., & Rocca, S. (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds.). Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness (pp. 219–237). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds). (2005). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 1–20). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. De Sousa Machado, T., Chur-Hansen, A., & Due, C. (2020). First-time mothers' perceptions of social support: Recommendations for best practice. Health Psychol Open. 2020 Feb 7;7(1):2055102919898611. doi: 10.1177/2055102919898611. PMID: 32095254; PMCID: PMC7008558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Downey, C. A., & Clandinin, D. J. (2010). Narrative inquiry as reflective practice: Tensions and Possibilities. In N. Lyons (Ed.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry (pp. 383–397). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85744-2_19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Dieleman, L.M., Moyson, De Pauw, S., Prinzie, P., & Soenens B. (2018). Parents' Need-related Experiences and Behaviors When Raising a Child With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, Vol. 42, pp. 26-37Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1994). Enabling and empowering families. In C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette, & A. G. Deal (Eds.), Supporting & strengthening families (Vol. 1., pp. 2–11). Brookline Books. (Original work published 1988) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Emmanuel, E., & St John, W. (2010). Maternal distress: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(9), 2104–2115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05371.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Fife, S. T., & Gossner, J. D. (2024). Deductive Qualitative Analysis: Evaluating, Expanding, and Refining Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241244856 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Freeman, E. M., & Couchonnal, G. (2006). Narrative and culturally based approaches in practice with families. Families in Society, 87(2), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Freeman, M. (2011). Stories, big and small: Toward a synthesis. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309354394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. George, C., & Solomon, J. (2008). The caregiving system: A behavioral systems approach to parenting. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 833–856). The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Golding, J., Steven Gregory, S.,Yasmin Iles-Caven, Y., & Stephen Nowicki, S.(2017). The antecedents of women’s external locus of control: Associations with characteristics of their parents and their early childhood , Heliyon, Volume 3, Issue 1, e00236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Gray, D. E. (2006). Coping over time: The parents of children with autism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(12), 970–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00933.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Hansen, L. A., & Petrakis, M. (2018, July 4–7). The self in motherhood: Learning from a systematized review of relational self-construal and wellbeing in mothers [Paper presentation]. Joint World Conference in Social Work, Education and Social Development, The RDS, Dublin, Ireland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Henderson, S. (2018). The blurring effect: An exploration of maternal instinct and ambivalence [Unpublished master's thesis]. University of Kent. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Jansen, W. S., Otten, S., Van der Zee, K. I., & Jans, L. (2014). Inclusion: Conceptualization and measurement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 370–385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Jansen, W. S., Meeussen, L., Jetten, J., & Ellemers, N. (2019). Negotiating inclusion: Revealing the dynamic interplay between individual and group inclusion goals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 520–533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Josten, C. &, Lordan, G.F (2025) What makes an individual inclusive of others? Development of the individual inclusiveness inventory. Front. Psychol. 16:1473120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Kielinen, M., Hjelmquist, E., Moilanen, I., & Syrjälä, L. (2005). Intervention, treatment and care in autistic disorder. Challenging case reports from northern Finland. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 64(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v64i1.17955 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Kurz, I. G. (2018). Families with children diagnosed with autism: Implications for counselors. The Family Journal, 26(4), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480718796256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Lai, W.W., Goh, T.J., Oei, T.P., & Sung, M. (2015). Coping and Well-Being in Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Journal of Autism Development Disorder, 45(8):2582-93. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2430-9. PMID: 25800867. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind (George Weidenfield and Nicholson Ltd, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Malone, J. C., & Dayton, C. J. (2015). What is the container/contained in the nursery? Joining Bion and Fraiberg in dyadic interventions with mother and infant. Infant Mental Health Journal, 36(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21509 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Masur, C.(2024). Translating Psychoanalytic Terms into Everyday Life: Containment. Psychology Today. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Mercer, R. T. (1986). First-time motherhood: Experiences from teens to forties. Springer Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Miller, T. (2005). Making sense of motherhood: A narrative approach. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 19–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Padgett, D. (2012). Qualitative and mixed methods in public health. SAGE. http://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00097a&AN=deakin.b3657335&authtype=sso&custid=deakin&site=eds-live&scope=site [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Paz, L., & Petrucci, I. (2023). Motherhood: conflicts between the biological and the social dimension, what does the Brazilian academic production tell? Research in Science Education , 25(1).Raphael -Leff, J. (2005). Psychological processes of childbearing (4th ed.). Anna Freud Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Rich, A. (1976). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. Norton [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Rogers, M. (2012). Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research. The Qualitative Report, 17(48), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1704 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Rotter, J. B. (1992). "Cognates of personal control: Locus of control, self-efficacy, and explanatory style": Comment. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 1(2), 127–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. 1849(05)80154-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Satterfield, C.(2020). Belonging: The What, why, and How for Working Mothers, (Dissertation). https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article = 1191&context = mapp_capstone [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Schmidt, E.M., Décieux, F., Zartler, U., & Schnor, C. (2023). What makes a good mother? Two decades of research reflecting social norms of motherhood, Journal of Theory & Review, 5, 57-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (Eds.). (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Sheldon, K. M., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2002). Psychological need-satisfaction and subjective well-being within social groups. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(Pt 1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602165036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Silver, H. (2015, October). The contexts of social inclusion. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, DESA Working Paper, 144. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2879940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Siklos, S., & Kerns, K. A. (2006). Assessing need for social support in parents of children with autism and Down syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(7), 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0129-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Smyth, J. (2017). Social Inclusion. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Stets, J.E., & Lee, J. (2021). The Mother Identity and Self-Esteem, In: P. S. Brenner et al. (eds.), Identities in Action, Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research 6, Chapter 7, pp.133-155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Symes, E. (2022). Containment – Psychoanalytic Theory Translated into Clinical Practice with Parents. Centre for Clinical Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Stewart, A. (2023). Belonging and uniqueness as essential elements for inclusive workplaces: A literature review. Pathfinder: A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals, 4(1). 106-117. https://doi.org/10.29173/pathfinder90 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Trepagnier, C. G. (1999). Virtual environments for the investigation and rehabilitation of cognitive and perceptual impairments. Neuro Rehabilitation, 12(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-1999-12107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Wills, L. (2017, June 22–23). The effect of the relational self-construal on the wellbeing of mothers of preschool aged children [Paper presentation], pp 17-31. Higher degree by research conference, Caulfield Campus, Monash University, Australia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Wibberley, C. (2017). Bricolage research methods. In E. A. Glasper & C. Rees (Eds.), Health care research: At a glance (pp. 106–107). Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Young, A. & Graham, T.(2021). Maternal failure: Exploring the theoretical intersections of containment and reflective functioning, Sabinet, 29(1), pp.70-100. https://journals.co.za/toc/ppsa1/29/1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
- Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
- Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
- Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
- Sustainable Design and Social Integration of Tiny Houses: Exploring Environmental, Technical, and Societal Dimension