Doctrinal Legal Research Methodology in Corporate Tax Governance Studies: Strengths, Critiques, and Balanced Reflections

Doctrinal legal research remains the principal methodology in legal scholarship, particularly for studies exploring corporate tax governance frameworks. This conceptual article rigorously investigates the doctrinal methodology's foundational role in analyzing complex tax regulatory systems and legal compliance mechanisms within corporate contexts. Utilizing a systematic doctrinal framework, the study deploys primary legal sources, including statutes, regulations, and judicial decisions, alongside authoritative secondary materials to examine corporate tax governance structures. This approach demonstrates methodological effectiveness across diverse corporate tax governance domains, revealing strengths in regulatory analysis, compliance framework evaluation, and enforcement mechanism assessment. The methodology provides comprehensive analytical tools for examining various governance instruments, including corporate liability frameworks, stakeholder protection mechanisms, and regulatory accountability structures. The doctrinal research process comprises precise problem identification, extensive legal materials collection, critical evaluation, analytical synthesis, and normative conclusion drawing. While addressing critiques of doctrinalism’s normative orientation and isolation from empirical methods, the study argues for doctrinal research’s essential role in generating rigorous legal analysis and guiding doctrinal innovation. This research thereby reaffirms doctrinal legal methodology’s primacy in legal scholarship and its capacity to yield robust, normative clarity in the study of law.

Doctrinal Legal Research Methodology; Corporate Tax Governance; Tax Compliance Framework

1. Akinsola, K. (2025). Legal Issues in Corporate Taxation and Governance: Navigating the Complexities of Tax Compliance and International Tax Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Armstrong, C. S., Blouin, J. L., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2015). Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Avi‐Yonah, R. S. (2024). Taxation and corporate governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bal, A. (2021). Taxation of virtual currencies in the European Union. European Taxation, 61(2/3), 67–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bassey, E. (2022). A conceptual framework for digital tax administration. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101742. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Blackham, A. (2022). When law and data collide: The methodological challenge of conducting mixed methods research in law. Journal of Law and Society, 49(3), 373–401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chynoweth, P. (2017). Legal research. In Legal Research Methods (pp. 1–24). Salford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Davies, M. (2020). Legal realism and legal doctrine. European Law Review, 45(2), 187– 203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Duhoon, A. (2023). Corporate tax avoidance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Lodging Business Research, 21(2), 197–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jallai, A. G. (2020). Good tax governance: International corporate tax planning and corporate social responsibility. Tilburg University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kovermann, J. (2019). Corporate governance and tax avoidance: A literature review. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 36, 100270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Majeed, N. (2023). Doctrinal research in law: Meaning, scope and methodology. BBE Journal, 9(2), 123–139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Malaysian Tax Corporate Governance Framework. (2025). IRBM Guidelines. Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Minnick, K., & Noga, T. (2010). Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management? Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(5), 703–718. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Monageng, R. (2023). Using mixed methods to understand tax compliance behaviour. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 21(3), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. OECD. (2024). Beneficial ownership and tax transparency: Implementation and remaining challenges. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Richardson, G., & Taylor, G. (2015). Income shifting incentives and tax haven utilization: Evidence from multinational U.S. firms. The International Journal of Accounting, 50(4), 458–485. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Scarpa, F. (2023). Understanding corporate tax responsibility: A systematic literature review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(7), 179–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Siems, M. (2009). The taxonomy of interdisciplinary legal research: Finding a way out of the methodological maze. Legal Studies, 29(3), 327–347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Siglé, M. A. (2022). The cooperative approach to corporate tax compliance: An empirical assessment. The Accounting Review, 97(3), 95–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tang, T. Y. H. (2019). The value implications of tax avoidance across countries. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(4), 615–638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Theil, S. (2025). Carefully tailored: Doctrinal methods and empirical legal scholarship. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(2), 234–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vranken, J. B. M. (2010). Methodology of legal doctrinal research. Hart Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wahab, N. S. A., & Holland, K. (2012). Tax planning, corporate governance and equity value. The British Accounting Review, 44(2), 111–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.