Bridging Quality Management and Performance Appraisal: Insights, Challenges, and Future Directions

The growing demand for organizational effectiveness has intensified interest in the integration of quality management (QM) and performance appraisal (PA). Yet, their relationship remains fragmented in both theory and practice. While QM emphasizes continuous improvement, customer focus, and operational efficiency, PA is primarily concerned with evaluating employee contributions and aligning them with organizational goals. The problem addressed in this study is the lack of consolidated insights into how these two domains intersect, particularly in terms of enhancing both organizational performance and employee engagement. This study aims to critically review the literature to identify consistent and emerging themes that define the relationship between QM and PA, as well as the associated challenges and future directions. The study employed a systematic literature review approach, synthesizing peer-reviewed research articles, conceptual papers, and case studies across management and organizational performance domains. Findings reveal three consistent themes: the enduring influence of Total Quality Management (TQM) on organizational performance, the role of performance management systems in employee motivation, and the adoption of innovative appraisal methods. In addition, two rising themes were identified: the integration of QM with innovation performance, and the expansion of QM systems in specialized industries such as healthcare and automotive. The implications of this study are both theoretical and practical. Theoretically, it bridges QM and PA as mutually reinforcing processes within organizational performance frameworks. Practically, it highlights the need for hybrid models that align QM practices with modern, technology-driven appraisal systems, offering pathways for sustainable growth, innovation, and employee engagement.

Quality Management (QM), Performance Appraisal (PA)

1. Al Owad, A., Karim, M. A., & Ma, L. (2013). Integrated Lean Six Sigma approach for patient flow improvement in hospital emergency department. Advanced Materials Research, 834–836, 1893–1902. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.834-836.1893 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bayo-Moriones, A., & de la Torre, R. (2022). Analysing the relationship between QM, performance appraisal and pay for performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(9–10), 1056–1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1933422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bounjerte, I., Khalidy, S., Mazouzy, I., El Turk, J., Haidar, I., Kettani, A., Saile, R., & Bennani, H. (2025). Evaluating organisational performance in healthcare: A mixed-method study using the McKinsey 7S framework. BMJ Open Quality, 14(2), e003317. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Champagne-Langabeer, T., & Delgado, R. (2018). Future of quality improvement. In Performance improvement in hospitals and health systems: Managing analytics and quality in healthcare (2nd ed., pp. 201–212). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315100050-14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chiware, M., & Vyas-Doorgapersad, S. (2023). Performance management challenges in the Ministry of Health and Child Care in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Management Practice, 16(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2023.132082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crema, M., & Verbano, C. (2013). Future developments in health care performance management. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 6, 415–421. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S54561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Firza, N., & Mazzitelli, D. (2025). Composite indicators for performance evaluation in healthcare. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 15650, pp. 237–248). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96962-1_16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Guermazi, H., & Mbarek, I. (2016). Quality management integrated system and reporting: Tunisian case study. Quality – Access to Success, 17(152), 53–60. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84974715428&partnerID=40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Haines, V. Y., III, St-Onge, S., & Marcoux, A. (2004). Performance management design and effectiveness in quality-driven organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2004.tb00330.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Karaszewski, R. (2004). Quality challenges in global companies. Quality Progress, 37(10), 59–65. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-6944247658&partnerID=40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kline, J. B. T., & Sulsky, L. M. (2009). Measurement and assessment issues in performance appraisal. Canadian Psychology, 50(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015668 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Liao, Y.-Y., Soltani, E., Iqbal, A., & van der Meer, R. (2024). Approaches to performance appraisal in TQM-driven organizations: Does control vs. learning approach matter? Production Planning and Control, 35(12), 1429–1450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2023.2189638 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mosoge, M. J., & Pilane, M. W. (2014). Performance management: The neglected imperative of accountability systems in education. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412120947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Muhammad, M., Suleiman, W., Mamun, M. A. A., Jewel, R. M., & Mozumder, M. A. S. (2025). Mediating effect of appraisal fairness between the relationship of appraisal satisfaction and employee performance appraisal: A case of Bauchi State Teachers Service Commission, Nigeria. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), Article 2450297. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2450297 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Onyeaku, J. (2023). Performance appraisal and performance management: Is there an optimal approach? In Examining applied multicultural industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1–24). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7212-5.ch001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Palshikar, G. K., Apte, M., Pawar, S., & Ramrakhiyani, N. (2017a). HiSPEED: A system for mining performance appraisal data and text. In Proceedings - 2017 International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA 2017) (pp. 477–486). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA.2017.45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Palshikar, G. K., Apte, M., Pawar, S., & Ramrakhiyani, N. (2019). HiSPEED: A system for mining performance appraisal data and text. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 8(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-018-0142-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Quan, P., Liu, Y., Zhang, T., Wen, Y., Wu, K., He, H., & Shi, Y. (2018). A novel data mining approach towards human resource performance appraisal. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10861, pp. 476–488). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93701-4_37 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rao, T. V., & Chawla, N. (2024). Performance management: Path to growth and excellence (pp. 1–330). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032671642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Soltani, E. (2005). Conflict between theory and practice: TQM and performance appraisal. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(8), 796–818. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710510617238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Soltani, E., Van Der Meer, R. B., & Williams, T. M. (2004). Challenges posed to performance management by TQM gurus: Contributions of individual employees versus systems-level features. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(8), 1069–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478336042000255488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sudnickas, T. (2016). Different levels of performance evaluation - Individual versus organizational. Public Policy and Administration, 15(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-16-15-2-01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wen, D., Sun, X., & Yan, D. (2022). The quality movement: Where are we going? Past, present and future. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(1–2), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1801342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria