Eco-Microcredit and Rural Transformation: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Farming Practices and the Moderating Effect of Financial Literacy on Household Sustainability

Rural communities often struggle to achieve sustainable livelihoods due to limited financial access, low adoption of sustainable farming practices, and insufficient financial literacy. This study addresses these challenges by examining how eco-microcredit, as a form of green financing, serves as a catalyst for rural transformation through its impact on sustainable farming practices and household sustainability. The study aims to develop and validate a conceptual framework that positions sustainable farming practices as a mediating variable and financial literacy as a moderating variable in the relationship between green financing and household sustainability. Using a conceptual and theoretical approach grounded in the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework, ecological modernization theory, and innovation-adoption theory, the study integrates financial access, behavioral adoption, and human capability perspectives. The findings suggest that eco-microcredit enhances household sustainability indirectly by promoting the adoption of sustainable farming practices, while financial literacy strengthens this relationship by enabling effective utilization of financial resources. The study contributes theoretically by linking financial inclusion, behavioral change, and sustainability outcomes in a unified model. Practically, it provides insights for policymakers and financial institutions to design integrated eco-microcredit programs that combine financial support, capacity building, and market access to achieve long-term rural resilience and sustainability.

Eco-microcredit, green financing, sustainable farming practices

1. Alqatan, A., Talbi, N., Behbehani, H., & Sbeiti, W. (2025). Dynamic interaction between microfinance and household well-being: Evidence from the microcredit progressive model for sustainable development. Econometrics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Berhanu, A., Amare, A., Gurmessa, B., & Chalchisa, T. (2021). Does microcredit use help farmers win the battle against food insecurity? Evidence from Jimma zone of Southwest Ethiopia. Agriculture & Food Security, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00311-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Department for International Development (DFID). (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Khandker, S. R., & Koolwal, G. B. (2016). How has microcredit supported agriculture? Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh. Agricultural Economics, 47(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kipkogei, S., Han, J., Mwalupaso, G., & Brenya, R. (2025). The synergistic effects of microcredit access and agricultural technology adoption on maize farmers’ income in Kenya. PLoS ONE, 20(3), e0300123. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lal, A., & Israel, E. (2006). An overview of microfinance and the environmental sustainability of smallholder agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 5(4), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2006.010266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Liu, Z. (2024). Assessing the role of green finance in enhancing rural economic resilience and environmental sustainability. Frontiers in Management Science, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fms.2024.01017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mariyono, J., Gunistiyo, Waskito, J., Nurwildani, M. F., & Kuntariningsih, A. (2019). Microcredit and technology adoption: Sustained pathways to improve farmers’ prosperity in Indonesia. Agricultural Finance Review, 79(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-05-2017-0033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mol, A. P. J., & Sonnenfeld, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). Ecological modernization around the world: Perspectives and critical debates. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Phan, C. T., Sun, S., Zhou, Z.-Y., & Beg, R. (2019). Does microcredit increase household food consumption? A study of rural Vietnam. Journal of Asian Economics, 62, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2019.03.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Revindo, M. D., & Gan, C. (2017). Accessibility and impact of rural credit cooperatives’ microcredit programmes to rural households: A case study from Hubei Province, China. In C. Gan (Ed.), Microfinance in Asia (pp. 143–162). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69799-4_7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Shahidullah, A. K. M., & Haque, C. E. (2014). Environmental orientation of small enterprises: Can microcredit-assisted microenterprises be “green”? Sustainability, 6(6), 3232–3252. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6063232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wang, Q., & Wang, M. (2012). Sustainable development model of microcredit companies in Shaanxi rural areas. Advanced Materials Research, 524–527, 3153–3157. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.524-527.3153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Yan, J., Li, J., Liu, Y., & Li, X. (2025). From migration to cultivation: How green finance reshapes rural income and enhances agricultural resilience. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1602053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1602053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Innovative Methods for Rare Earth Element Extraction
• Global Trends in Sustainability Reporting: A Malaysian Evidence