Social Bonding and Power Dynamics in Wet Markets: The Role of Participative Decision-Making in Market Bandar Riyal, Sarawak
Authors
University Malaysia Sarawak (Malaysia)
University Malaysia Sarawak (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000208
Subject Category: Business
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 2501-2516
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-12
Accepted: 2025-09-18
Published: 2025-11-07
Abstract
This study analyzes the social bonding and power dynamics between vendors and local authorities in the Bandar Riyal Wet Market, Sarawak. Focusing on the participatory decision-making approach in community governance, the research explored vendor and local authority relationships, informal negotiation, and organizational structures. While past literature has discussed participatory decision-making approaches to improve the effectiveness of local authorities, there is a lack of research on the functioning of wet market communities and their participation in decision-making processes. This research utilized qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews and empirical observations, to understand the complex groups. The findings reveal that although vendors maintain strong internal social bonds that create a collective support system, their participation in market management remains limited. The Kota Samarahan Municipal Council holds primary decision-making power regardless of the vendor committee functioning as an advisory body with minimal influence. This research will clarify the role of social capital in managing small businesses that sustain local markets. Finally, this research emphasizes the need for more inclusive policy frameworks that empower vendor voices in local market management.
Keywords
Power dynamics, wet market, vendors, municipal council
Downloads
References
1. Abas, A., Arifin, K., Ali, M. A. M., & Khairil, M. (2023). A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges. Environmental Development, 46(1), 100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100853 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Agampodi, T. C., Agampodi, S. B., Glozier, N., & Siribaddana, S. (2015). Measurement of social capital in relation to health in low and middle income countries (LMIC): A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 128, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bahardin, T. M. I., Alias, Z., & Abdullah, M. (2019). A systematic review of the issues affecting local government in Malaysia. Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies, 15(1), 33–40. https://akademiabaru.com/submit/index.php/arbms/article/view/1330 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bardosh, K., Guinto, R. R., Bukachi, S. A., Minh Hằng, T., Bongcac, M. K., Santos, M., Mburu, C. M., Abela, J., Kelly, D., & Maller, C. (2023). Wet market biosecurity reform: Three social narratives influence stakeholder responses in Vietnam, Kenya, and the Philippines. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001704 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bhandari, H., & Yasunobu, K. (2009). What is social capital? A comprehensive review of the concept. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37(3), 480–510. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853109X436847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bouchrika, I. (2024). What is empirical research? Definition, types & samples. Research.com. https://research.com/research/what-is-empirical-research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Westport. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder international tool series. https://nyhealthfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Cheng, L., & Pilo, W. (2018, November 29). Bandar Riyal Market — Kota Samarahan’s hidden gem. DayakDaily. https://dayakdaily.com/bandar-riyal-market-kota-samarahans-hidden-gem/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Davies, J., Blekking, J., Hannah, C., Zimmer, A., Joshi, N., Anderson, P., Chilenga, A., & Evans, T. (2022). Governance of traditional markets and rural-urban food systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Habitat International, 127(102620). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. DayakDaily. (2019, August 15). The fans at Bandar Riyal Market in need of cleaning, council told. DayakDaily. https://dayakdaily.com/the-fans-at-bandar-riyal-market-in-need-of-cleaning-council-told/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392?seq=1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hermawati, R., & Paskarina, C. (2020). Patterns of power relation of street vendors in Bandung city. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 5(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v5i2.20607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kamarudin, N., Zakaria, Z., Noordin, nazmi @ nazni , Aini Yaacob, M., Mustaffa, J., Hilmie, M., & Sawal, M. (2011). The future challenges of local authorities in Malaysia: A case study in Seberang Perai, Penang. African Journal Of Business Management, 5(26). https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm11.1445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Kaur, M. (2023, July 24). “Clean up markets, first.” The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2023/07/25/clean-up-markets-first [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Local Authorities Ordinance, Cap 20 § 104 (1996). https://lawnet.sarawak.gov.my/lawnet_file/Ordinance/ORD_CAP.20(Watermark)(H).pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, A., & Chudasama, H. (2023). Sampling methods in research: A review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371985656_Sampling_Methods_in_Research_A_Review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Mele, C., Ng, M., & Chim, M. B. (2015). Urban markets as a “corrective” to advanced urbanism: The social space of wet markets in contemporary Singapore. Urban Studies, 52(1), 103–120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24855555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Munro, A. (2023). Power: Political and social science. In Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/power-political-and-social-science [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Murray, S. F., Akoum, M. S., & Storeng, K. T. (2012). Capitals diminished, denied, mustered and deployed. A qualitative longitudinal study of women’s four year trajectories after acute health crisis, Burkina Faso. Social Science & Medicine, 75(12), 2455–2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. New Sarawak Tribune. (2019, August 17). Bandar Riyal Traders Assured Of Clean Market. New Sarawak Tribune. https://www.newsarawaktribune.com.my/bandar-riyal-traders-assured-of-clean-market/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press; JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1np6zz [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Zanudin, K., Ngah, I., & Misnan, S. H. (2019). Limitations on Community Participation in Planning Decision-making in Peninsular Malaysia: A Review of Recent Studies. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 7(4), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.7.4_131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Zhang, Q. F., & Pan, Z. (2013). The transformation of urban vegetable retail in China: Wet markets, supermarkets and informal markets in Shanghai. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(3), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.782224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
- A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
- India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
- Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
- Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits