Needs Analysis: Development of an Interactive Digital Storybook in Teaching Mixtures and their Characteristics among Grade 6 Learners

Scientific literacy is a critical skill in the 21st century, yet many Filipino learners struggle to comprehend scientific concepts due to poor reading comprehension and limited access to engaging instructional materials. This study aimed to assess the needs for developing an Interactive Digital Storybook (IDS) as a supplementary tool for teaching Mixtures and Their Characteristics among Grade 6 learners. Utilizing a descriptive quantitative design with qualitative support, the research focused on the Define Phase of the 4D Model. Six in-service science teachers from a public elementary school in the West I District of Iligan City served as key informants, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a validated Needs Assessment Questionnaire and analyzed through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Findings revealed that learners encounter significant difficulties in understanding mixtures due to the abstract and conceptual nature of the topic, limited visual and hands-on learning experiences, and persistent misconceptions. Teachers reported challenges such as lack of engaging and contextualized materials, low reading comprehension among learners, and limited access to technology. Despite minimal familiarity with digital storybooks, teachers perceived IDS as a useful, engaging, and motivating instructional tool that could enhance comprehension and accessibility in science learning. The study concludes that there is a strong need to design and develop an IDS aligned with curriculum standards to promote inclusive, interactive, and literacy-integrated science instruction, forming a foundation for the succeeding phases of the IDS development process.

4D Model; Grade 6 Learners; Interactive Digital Storybook

1. Abdul Samat, N. (2022). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Applications in digital education. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 14(2), 115–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aksela, M. (2010). Evidence-based teacher education: Becoming a lifelong research-oriented chemistry teacher? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 84–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alkahtani, M. A. (2017). Enhancing science learning through digital resources in resource-limited environments. International Journal of Science Education, 39(8), 1023–1041. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asih, M. D., Hidayat, N., & Suharto, R. (2018). Reading comprehension and scientific literacy: A correlational study among elementary learners. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bouchrika, I. (2025). Digital transformation in education: Challenges and opportunities. Open Education Studies, 9(1), 34–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. BSCS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cahyanto, D. A., Rohmah, R., &Sulistyowati, E. (2019). Students’ misconceptions in understanding mixtures and solutions. Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 201–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Caulfield, J. (2023). How to do thematic analysis: A step-by-step guide.Scribbr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cervetti, G., & Hiebert, E. H. (2019). The impact of reading comprehension on science achievement. Educational Researcher, 48(1), 21–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DepEd. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 basic education program (DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015). Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Estrella, L. (2021). Teachers’ digital competence and technology integration in Philippine classrooms. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 8(3), 56–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fang, C., Wu, L., & Sung, Y. (2023). Interactive storybooks and student engagement: A constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 197, 104725. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fernando, J. (2022). Perceived difficulties in learning chemistry among secondary students. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(4), 1751–1760. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. FasterCapital. (2025). The role of digital storybooks in modern education. Educational Technology Insights, 17(1), 43–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ihmeideh, F. (2014). The effect of electronic books on the development of children’s literacy. Computers & Education, 79, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jumawan, M. (2022). Needs assessment for the development of digital instructional materials. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 102–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2012). Direct and indirect benefits of e-book reading for emergent literacy. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(4), 449–467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles of multimedia learning: The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teaching. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Modi, N., Ahmed, M., & Rani, P. (2024). Advancing sustainable education through digital innovation: Aligning with SDGs. Journal of Sustainability in Education, 12(1), 33–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Neumann, M. (2018). The role of teachers in digital storybook reading: Opportunities and challenges. Early Child Development and Care, 188(8), 1173–1185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Neri, R., Balagtas, C., & Rivera, M. (2019). Reading comprehension and science achievement among Filipino learners. Philippine Journal of Educational Measurement, 10(2), 23–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nguyen, T., Do, H., & Pham, L. (2021). Enhancing science learning outcomes through digital storytelling in low-resource settings. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4925–4942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 results (volume I): The state of learning outcomes.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. H. (2013). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Palines, L. (2021). Literacy and learning in science: The Philippine perspective. Asian Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 115–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rafiq, K., & Hashim, R. (2018). The role of interactive storytelling in science education. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 13–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Rodriguez, M. (2021). Digital infrastructure challenges in Philippine classrooms. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 112–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Salic, M. A., Madale, V. A., & Buan, A. T. (2024). Inclusive and interactive science teaching: A framework for 21st-century learning. Mindanao Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Shahid, M., Ahmad, S., & Yusof, N. (2022). Digital storytelling and reading comprehension: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12311–12329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: A comprehensive study. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sung, Y., & Wu, L. (2022). Exploring interactive e-books for science literacy improvement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Taber, K. S. (2015). Science education and student learning: Understanding and preventing misconceptions. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tamimi, R. (2024). Enhancing language and literacy through digital storybooks: A meta-analysis. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 25(2), 14–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Talan, T. (2021). The effect of digital story-based teaching on student engagement and motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 31–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for digital literacy: The role of teachers’ professional development. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. UNESCO. (2019). ICT competency framework for teachers (Version 3). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Green Synthesis of Calcium Oxide Nanoparticles from Pigeon Eggshells for Cement Composites
• Thickness Dependent Structural, Optical, Electrical and Gas Sensing properties of ZnO thin film
• Forensic Chemistry Laboratory Works from Home: Challenges Encountered by Criminology Students During the Conduct of their Laboratory Activities at Home
• The Concept of Wellness Club and How it Differs from the Present Gym?
• Vitamin B-Complex Mitigates Sub-Chronic Methamphetamine-Induced Oxidative Stress and Neurobehavioral Deficits in Adolescent Wistar Rats