The Role of Trade in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Agricultural Exports in Africa

This study employs a fixed-effects panel regression model with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors to analyze the relationship between agricultural export performance and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators across 45 African nations from 2000 to 2022. Export performance is measured through the per capita value of agricultural exports and a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) of export product concentration, while controlling for GDP per capita, institutional quality, and population dynamics.
The empirical results reveal statistically significant yet dualistic associations. A 1% increase in agricultural exports per capita is associated with a 1.25 percentage point reduction in poverty (p<0.05) and a 0.89 percentage point increase in annual GDP growth (p<0.01), suggesting a positive link to SDGs 1 and 8. However, this export growth is also correlated with a 0.83 point increase in the Gini coefficient (p<0.05), a 2.15% rise in agricultural CO₂ emissions (p<0.01), and a 1.98 percentage point loss in forest cover (p<0.01), highlighting severe trade-offs for SDGs 10, 13, and 15. Furthermore, a one-unit increase in export concentration (HHI) is associated with a 2.18 percentage point increase in poverty and a 1.12 percentage point decrease in forest area (p<0.05). The findings indicate that the scale and composition effects of export expansion dominate, overwhelming any potential technique effect from economic gains.
We conclude that while agricultural exports are a significant correlate of macroeconomic growth in Africa, their benefits are not automatically inclusive or sustainable. The results robustly indicate that export diversification and strong institutions are critical mitigating factors against these trade-offs. Policy must therefore pivot from promoting raw commodity volume to strategically fostering value-added, diversified, and sustainably certified export sectors to align trade with the holistic 2030 Agenda.

Agricultural Exports, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

1. Addison, T., & Levin, J. (2012). The determinants of primary commodity trade. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, *21*(4), 553–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2011.538186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, *5*(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009850119329 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cadot, O., Carrère, C., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2011). Export diversification: What's behind the hump? The Review of Economics and Statistics, *93*(2), 590–605. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Carrère, C., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2017). Export diversification and growth in developing countries. The World Economy, *40*(3), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12398 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. The Economic Journal, *114*(493), F22–F49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). Global forest resources assessment 2020: Main report. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9825en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, *110*(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Heckscher, E. F. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, *21*(2), 1–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hosonuma, N., Herold, M., De Sy, V., De Fries, R. S., Brockhaus, M., Verchot, L., Angelsen, A., & Romijn, E. (2012). An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters, *7*(4), 044009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Krugman, P. R. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics, *9*(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lederman, D., & Xu, C. (2021). Comparative advantage and trade intensity: Are the lopsided gains? Journal of Development Economics, *148*, 102579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Maertens, M., & Swinnen, J. F. (2009). Trade, standards, and poverty: Evidence from Senegal. World Development, *37*(1), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, *71*(6), 1695–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. United Nations Department of Economic Affairs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, *98*(5, Part 2), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, *45*(4–6), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Singer, H. W. (1950). The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. The American Economic Review, *40*(2), 473–485. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda [Google Scholar] [Crossref]