Bridging the Intention–Action Gap through Entrepreneurial Optimism: A Conceptual Exploration
Authors
Faculty of Management, University Technology Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Management, University Technology Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000267
Subject Category: Entrepreneurship
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 3272-3279
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-12
Accepted: 2025-10-19
Published: 2025-11-10
Abstract
The importance of entrepreneurial intention has been widely recognised as veritable and reliable predictor of entrepreneurial action, However, many individuals who intend to start businesses fail to act accordingly. This problem, known as the intention–action gap, has become a major concern in entrepreneurship studies. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and positive psychology, this conceptual paper explores entrepreneurial optimism as a moderating variable that can bridge this intention-action gap. Entrepreneurial optimism can be defined as a positive cognitive bias toward expecting favorable outcomes thereby enhancing persistence, confidence, and resilience under uncertainty. This study integrates TPB with psychological capital theory to propose a model in which optimism strengthens the relationship between entrepreneurial intention and entrepreneurial action. The By synthesized insights from recent and established studies, this study extends TPB’s explanatory power and offers a more psychologically grounded understanding of entrepreneurial action. The paper also outlines implications for entrepreneurship education and policy in developing economies like Nigeria, particularly regarding programs that inculcate and cultivate optimism among young entrepreneurs. The paper concludes with calls for empirical validation to further examine optimism’s moderating role and other psychological factors in the intention–action relationship.
Keywords
Entrepreneurial optimism, Theory of Planned Behavior
Downloads
References
1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Akinwale, Y., & Adepoju, A. (2021). Youth entrepreneurship and innovation for sustainable development in Africa. Journal of African Business, 22(3), 319–337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Campos, F., Frese, M., & Gielnik, M. M. (2022). The psychology of entrepreneurship: The next decade. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 71(4), 1241–1272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2014). Dispositional optimism. In M. W. Gallagher & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Positive Psychological Assessment (2nd ed., pp. 75–91). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 879–889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fayolle, A., & Liñán, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 663–666. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Gorgievski, M. J., & Stephan, U. (2016). Advancing the psychology of entrepreneurship: A review of the psychological literature and an introduction. Applied Psychology, 65(3), 437–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Hmieleski, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 473–488. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hmieleski, K. M., & Lerner, D. A. (2020). The dark triad and nascent entrepreneurship: Unraveling the interplay of psychological traits and behavior. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kautonen, T., van Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655–674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907–933. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2019). Psychological Capital and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Neneh, B. N. (2022). From entrepreneurial intentions to behavior: The role of self-efficacy and situational factors. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(1), 41–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Schwarz, S., Cohen, M., & Nielsen, I. (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(1), 2–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Jiang, Y., & Humphreys, M. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S120–S138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nowiński, W., Haddoud, M. Y., Lančarič, D., Egerová, D., & Czeglédi, C. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and gender on entrepreneurial intentions of university students in the Visegrad countries. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 361–379. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Olawale, F., & Garwe, D. (2023). Entrepreneurial optimism and venture success in emerging economies: A systematic review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(7), 1621–1638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Otache, I. (2024). Do entrepreneurial self-efficacy, alertness and opportunity recognition mediate the effect of entrepreneurship education on intention? Studies in Higher Education, 49(3), 589–605. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Raeis, M., Ghorbani, A., & Taghipour, A. (2024). Psychological capital and entrepreneurial action: The mediating role of optimism. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1429983. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291–332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The intention–behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503–518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Shirokova, G., Osiyevskyy, O., & Bogatyreva, K. (2018). Exploring the intention–behavior link in student entrepreneurship: The moderating role of individual and environmental characteristics. European Management Journal, 36(4), 529–540. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Trevelyan, R. (2016). Self-regulation and effort in entrepreneurial tasks. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(4), 449–467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. van Gelderen, M., Kautonen, T., & Fink, M. (2018). From entrepreneurial intentions to actions: Self-control and action-related doubt, fear, and aversion. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 760–779. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Yasir, N., & Majid, A. (2023). Optimism and entrepreneurial performance: The moderating role of resilience. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(4), 945–963. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Entrepreneurship and Start-Up Ecosystem Vis-À-Vis Government Start-Up Scheme in Manipur: A Critical Review and a Way Forward
- Building Resilience: How Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs Use Strengths and Resources to Navigate Challenges
- Branding in Digital Entrepreneurship: Evaluating Branding Criteria in IT Entrepreneurship
- Entrepreneurial Orientation of Undergraduate Students in University Malaysia Perlis: A Conceptual Paper
- Exploring the Influence of Effective Entrepreneurial Education on Youth Employment in Nigeria