Universiti Teknologi MARA and Constitutional Idolatry

University Teknologi MARA (UiTM) exists as a statutory body by virtue of an Act of Parliament (Act 173) and it is regarded as a special instrument to further the objectives of the quota provision under Article 153 of the Federal Constitution. Unfortunately, an examination of its policies would reveal severe inconsistencies and contradictions with the law. However, this state of affairs is a perfect example of the “living law” as opposed to “constitutional idolatry” in which the real workings and understanding of the Constitution do not always align perfectly with the content of the Constitution. This paper proposes to explore these legal issues, using the legal doctrinal and theoretical analysis as its research method. An examination of the UiTM controversy by this paper would demonstrate the influence and effects of sociolegal jurisprudence and postmodern jurisprudence. In sociolegal jurisprudence, law must also be examined from the actions of individuals and institutions, while in postmodern jurisprudence, it denies the impartiality of “law” and it also exposes the reasons for any kinds of legal comprehension. Hence this paper would prove that merely applying legality based on the law is an inadequate analysis and response to the legal and constitutional problems surrounding UiTM.

UiTM, constitutional idolatry, constitution

1. Pound, R. (1910). Law in Books and Law in Action. American Law Review 44:12–36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Erhlich, (1937). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Thio, L.I. (2012). A Treatise on Singapore Constitutional Law. Academy Publishing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Balkin. (2010, September 27). A sceptical View of Constitutional Worship. Balkin.com. https://balkin.blogspot.com/2010/09/skeptical-view-of-constitution-worship.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jones, B. C. (2015). Preliminary Warnings on 'Constitutional' Idolatry. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2578314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lin, C.C. (2024). Believe in the Ideal, Not the Idol: Constitutional Literacy and Constitutional Idolatry in Taiwan. Constitutional Studies, Volume 10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Shaari, M.N.G. (2011). Wither the Bumiputera Identity of UiTM. Kajian Malaysia, Vol. 29, No. 2, 67–89 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Varuhas, J.N. (2022). Mapping Doctrinal Methods. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4087836 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Swettenham. F.A. (1899). The Real Malay. The Bodley Head [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Alatas, S.H. (1977).The Myth of the Lazy Native. Frank Cass [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Yeo, K.W. (1971). British Policy Towards the Malays in the Federated Malay States 1920-1940. Phd thesis, Australian National University, https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/items/262810e1-232b-4054-b440-a5da1595c478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fanon, F. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth.Grove Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Philip. L.F.S. (1972). Malay Precedence and the Federal Formula in the Federated Malay States, 1909 to 1939. JMBRAS, Vol 45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wade, G. (2009).The Origins and Evolution of Ethnocracy in Malaysia. Asia Research Institute, Working Paper Series No.112, National University of Singapore, https://ari.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/wps09_112.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. MacMichael, H.A. (1946). Report on A Mission to Malaya, Malayan Union Government Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Report of the Federation of Malaya Constitutional Commission, 1957, HMSO, London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Constitutional Proposals for the Federation of Malaya, 1957, HMSO, London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Federal Constitution of Malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ibrahim, A. (2018). MALAYSIA AS A FEDERATION. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 1(1. Jun), 1–28. Retrieved from https://juku.um.edu.my/index.php/JMCL/article/view/14379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Report of the Inter-Governmental Committee, 1962, https://sagc.sabah.gov.my/sites/default/files/law/IGCReport.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fernando, J.M. (1995). The Emergence of the Alliance and the Making of Malaya’s Independence Constitution, 1948-1957. Phd thesis, University of London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. White Paper, (1971). Towards National Harmony, Government Printers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hansard, Dewan Rakyat [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hansard, Dewan Negara [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. SP Boon Seng Project v Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Negeri Kedah & Anor [2018] 8 CLJ 216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lee Bak Chui & Ors v Kerajaan Negeri Kedah Darul Aman & Ors [2024] 11 MLJ 556 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Menteri Besar Selangor, (2008, August 13). Jangan panjangkan isu kemasukan pelajar. https://drhalimahali.blogspot.com/2008/08/kenyataan-media-menteri-besar-selangor.html?m=0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kaur, S. (2008, August 24). Not ready for change. TheStar.com https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2008/08/24/not-ready-for-change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. The Star. (2008, August 15). Students protest against proposal. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2008/08/15/students-protest-against-proposal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tan, W.Z. (2017, December 06). The epic story of how uitm students hijacked a train and took over the campus in 1974. Cilisos.my https://cilisos.my/the-epic-story-of-how-uitm-students-hijacked-a-train-and-took-over-the-campus-in-1974/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. The Star, (2015, October 23). UiTM should open doors to non Bumiputeras, says Pro Chancellor. TheStar.com https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/10/23/uitm-for-non-bumi/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. The Malaysian Insider. (2015, October 23). Keep uitm doors closed to non bumis, says Perkasa. TheMalaysianInsider.com https://sg.news.yahoo.com/keep-uitm-doors-closed-non-080130302.html In 2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Bernama. (January 11). UiTM insists on retaining bumiputera only policy. Freemalaysiatoday.com https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2019/01/11/uitm-insists-on-retaining-bumiputera-only-policy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Anuar, A. (2018, Mei 29). Hundreds of thousands back UiTM alumni in restricting admission to bumiputera. malaymail.com https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2018/05/29/hundreds-of-thousands-back-uitm-alumni-in-restricting-admission-to-bumipute/1636106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zurairi, A.R. (2018, Mei 29). Amid UiTM furore, Hindraf dissociates itself from Hindraf2.0. Malaymail.com https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2018/05/29/amid-uitm-furore-hindraf-dissociates-itself-from-hindraf-2.0/1636109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. CodeBlue. (2024,May 09). MMA: Open up UiTM Thoracic Surgery Postgrad to Non Bumi for National Interests. codeblue.galencentre.org https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2024/05/mma-open-up-uitms-cardiothoracic-surgery-postgrad-to-non-bumi-for-national-interest/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Lyn, B.S. (2024, May 04). UiTM willing to temporarily open up cardiothoracic surgery postgrad programme to non-Buma parallel parthway trainees, graduates: professor. codeblue.galencentre.org https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2024/04/uitm-willing-to-temporarily-open-up-cardiothoracic-surgery-postgrad-programme-to-non-bumi-parallel-pathway-trainees-graduates-professor [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Solhi, F. (2024, June 26). UiTM remains Bumiputera exclusive, UM offers cardiothoracic surgerycourse: Zambry. Scoop.my https://www.scoop.my/news/211373/uitm-remains-bumiputera-exclusive-um-offers-cardiothoracic-surgery-course-zambry/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. FMT Reporters. (2024, May 22). UiTM student council sorry for protest misunderstanding. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2024/05/22/uitm-student-council-sorry-for-protest-misunderstanding. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Strauss, D.A. (2010, September 27). The Living Constitution. law.chicago.edu htts://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/living-constitution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tew Y. Malaysia’s Invisible Constitution. In: Dixon R, Stone A, eds. The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy. Cambridge University Press; 2018:376-400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tay W. Dimensions of Ketuanan Melayu in the Malaysian Constitutional Framework. In: Harding A, Shah DAH, eds. Law and Society in Malaysia. Routledge; 2018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Azeez Basha v Union of India AIR [1968] SC 662 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Dr Naresh Agarwal v Union of India 2005(4)AWC3745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Aligarh Muslim University v Naresh Agarwal &Ors [2024] INSC 856 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Malaysia Agreement 1963 https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20750/volume-750-i-10760-english.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/act/cons1963?ProvIds=P113-#pr152- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tan, Eugene K. B.. Article 152 of the Singapore Constitution: The past, present, and future of multiracial recognition, inclusion, and accommodation. (2020). Beyond Bicentennial: Perspectives on Malays. 713-726, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Neo, JLC. The Constitution and the Protection of Minorities :A Judicious Balance?. In: Thio LI, Tan K, eds. Evolution of a Revolution: Forty Years of the Singapore Constitution. Routledge-Cavendish, 2018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Mutalib, H. (2011). The Singapore Minority Dilemma. Asian Survey, 51(6), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2011.51.6.1156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Li,T. (1989). Malays in Singapore: Culture, Economy and Ideology. Oxford University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Rahim, LZ. (1998). The Singapore Dilemma. Oxford University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Lyons, L., Ford, M. (2009). Singaporean First: Challenging the Concept of Transnational Malay Masculinity. In Derek Heng, Syed Muhd Khairudin Aljunied (Eds.), Reframing Singapore: Memory - Identity - Trans-Regionalism, (pp. 175-193). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Visser, D.M & Jones, B.C. (2023). Unpacking constitutional literacy. (2023). Global Constitutionalism. 1-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Sethi, A. (2024). The Difference Constitutional Literacy Can Make: Critical Insights from Crisis Ridden India. Constitutional Studies, Volume 10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.