From Reporting to Responsibility: An Analysis of Environmental Sustainability Indicators among Malaysian Firms

This study investigates environmental sustainability reporting among 214 Malaysian public-listed companies over the period 2018–2022. Focusing on six key environmental indicators (EN1–EN1.5) derived from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI Standards) and the Bursa Malaysia Sustainability Reporting Framework, the research assesses the extent and progression of environmental disclosure across dimensions such as total environmental reporting, 3R practices, reuse and reduction activities, recycling, eco-friendly product innovation, and waste management systems. Descriptive statistics and trend analysis were used to evaluate reporting patterns over time. The results reveal a consistent upward trend across all indicators, reflecting firms’ growing commitment to environmental responsibility and the institutionalisation of sustainability practices within corporate governance. The findings support institutional theory, suggesting that regulatory pressures, stakeholder expectations, and industry norms have collectively driven greater environmental accountability and standardisation in disclosure practices. Overall, this study contributes longitudinal evidence on corporate environmental reporting in an emerging economy context. It highlights how Malaysian firms are transitioning from compliance-based disclosure to integrated sustainability management, aligning with international reporting standards and contributing to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Corporate Environmental Disclosure;

1. Abate, F., Bisogno, M., & Citro, F. (2025). Sustainable strategic targets, sustainability indicators and sustainability reporting: The case of port authorities. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 37(6), 175–192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, N. N. N., Sulaiman, M., & Siswantoro, D. (2021). Corporate sustainability reporting and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies. Sustainability, 13(17), 9542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ajibike, W. A., Adeleke, A. Q., Mohamad, F., Bamgbade, J. A., & Moshood, T. D. (2023). The impacts of social responsibility on the environmental sustainability performance of the Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(5), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1822855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Akhter, F., Hossain, M. R., Elrehail, H., Rehman, S. U., & Almansour, B. (2023). Environmental disclosures and corporate attributes from the lens of legitimacy theory: A longitudinal analysis on a developing country. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 32(3), 342–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2022-0223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alam, M. M., Tahir, Y. M., Saif-Alyousfi, A. Y., Ali, W. B., Muda, R., & Nordin, S. (2022). Financial factors influencing environmental, social and governance ratings of public listed companies in Bursa Malaysia. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2118207. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2118207 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Amoako, G. K., Adam, A. M., Tackie, G., & Arthur, C. L. (2021). Environmental accountability practices of environmentally sensitive firms in Ghana: Does institutional isomorphism matter? Sustainability, 13(17), 9489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Amran, A., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: A case of a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Anlesinya, A., Amponsah-Tawiah, K., Dartey-Baah, K., Adeti, S. K., & Brefo-Manuh, A. B. (2023). Institutional isomorphism and sustainable HRM adoption: A conceptual framework. Industrial and Commercial Training, 55(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-04-2022-0043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Avotra, A. A. R. N., Chenyun, Y., Yongmin, W., Lijuan, Z., & Nawaz, A. (2021). Conceptualizing the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in green construction and its nexus to sustainable development. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 774822. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.774822 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Azzone, G., Brophy, M., Noci, G., Welford, R., & Young, W. (1997). A stakeholders’ view of environmental reporting. Long Range Planning, 30(5), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00036-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bui, T. D., Tseng, M. L., Wu, K. J., & Chiu, A. S. (2021). Applying circular economy principles to mitigate plastic waste in supply chains: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 127213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2015). CSR disclosure: The more things change...? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. de Villiers, C., Hsiao, P. C. K., & Maroun, W. (2021). Developing a conceptual model of influences around integrated reporting: New insights and directions for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 124055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Del Gesso, C., & Lodhi, R. N. (2025). Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: A systematic review of accounting studies. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(2), 433–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2024.100590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dimitriou, D., & Karagkouni, A. (2022). Assortment of airports’ sustainability strategy: A comprehensiveness analysis framework. Sustainability, 14(7), 4217. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074217 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Elaigwu, M., Abdulmalik, S. O., & Talab, H. R. (2024). Corporate integrity, external assurance and sustainability reporting quality: Evidence from Malaysian public-listed companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-07-2021-0307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 100, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hamad, S., Lai, F. W., Shad, M. K., Khatib, S. F., & Ali, S. E. A. (2023). Assessing the implementation of sustainable development goals: Does integrated reporting matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2021-0322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hizam, S. M., Ibrahim, A. H., & Zakaria, Z. (2020). Sustainability reporting in Malaysia: A review of disclosure practices and influencing factors. Sustainability, 12(10), 4265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jamil, A., & Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2021). The influence of corporate governance structure on sustainability reporting in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(8), 1045–1064. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2020-0310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Jiang, Y., & Tang, Q. (2023). Mandatory carbon reporting, voluntary carbon disclosure and ESG performance. Pacific Accounting Review, 35(4), 534–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-07-2022-0121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kee, H. W., Suppiah, K., Mohd Sidik, S. D., & VN, K. (2021). Challenges in sustainability reporting: Evidence from Malaysia. E-Proceeding for Asian Conference on Business, Economics and Social Science (ACBESS). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lai, A., & Stacchezzini, R. (2021). Organisational and professional challenges amid the evolution of sustainability reporting: A theoretical framework and an agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2019-0624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Latip, M., Sharkawi, I., Mohamed, Z., & Kasron, N. (2022). The impact of external stakeholders’ pressures on the intention to adopt environmental management practices and the moderating effects of firm size. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 32(3), 45–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mahmud, M. T. (2020). Quest for a single theory to explain managerial motivations for sustainability disclosures: Legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory or institutional theory. Bulletin of Japanese Association for International Accounting Studies, 7, 135–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Misman, S. N., & Adnan, I. H. (2023). A study on the Malaysian sustainability reporting guidelines for Islamic financial institutions. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Research, 1, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Monazzam, A., & Nilsson, F. (2025). The role of sustainability reporting in strategic management. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 26(4), 811-828. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-11-2023-0375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rani, A., & Haris, M. (2025). Legal assessment of environmental, social, and governance integration for renewable energy success in Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(1), 101–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rouen, E., Sachdeva, K., & Yoon, A. (2022). The evolution of ESG reports and the role of voluntary standards. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4227934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sari, R., & Muslim, M. (2024). Corporate transparency and environmental reporting: Trends and benefits. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 4(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Schober, P., Mascha, E. J., & Vetter, T. R. (2021). From A (Agreement) to Z (z Score): A guide to interpreting common measures of association and reliability. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 133(6), 1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Shafai, N. A., & Abd-Mutalib, H. (2024). Ownership structures and sustainability reporting of Malaysian listed companies. Jurnal Pengurusan, 70(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sisaye, S. (2021). The influence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on the development of voluntary sustainability accounting reporting rules. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 1(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-02-2021-0016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sroufe, R. (2017). Integration and organizational change towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sulaiman, M., Ahmad, N. N. N., & Alwi, N. (2020). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 121560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., & Mustikaningtiyas, F. (2021). Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon, 7(3), e06415 (1-9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wu, D., & Memon, H. (2022). Public pressure, environmental policy uncertainty, and enterprises’ environmental information disclosure. Sustainability, 14(12), 6948. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126948 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Yatim, P. (2024). Sustainability reporting of Malaysian listed palm oil companies. Global Business and Management Research, 16(4s), 2216–2229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Yazid, A. H., & Maryani, N. (2025). SDGs and sustainability reporting: Their effect on financial performance of energy firms in Indonesia. Sustainability, 17(2), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17021234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Yusoff, H., Othman, R., & Yatim, N. (2019). The extent of corporate sustainability reporting and its determinants among Malaysian companies. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(3), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-04-2019-0051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area