Flourishing Minds, Flourishing Workplasces: The Impact of Psychological Well-Being on Employee Performance
Authors
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Puteri Farahdiana Megat Suhaimi
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000299
Subject Category: Psychology
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 3661-3666
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-12
Accepted: 2025-10-19
Published: 2025-11-11
Abstract
The relationship between psychological well-being and employee productivity has received increasing attention in recent years as organizations recognize the importance of mental health in achieving sustainable performance. This study examines the impact of psychological well-being (PWB) on work performance (WP) among private sector employees in Klang, Selangor. Grounded in the PERMA framework and supported by positive organizational psychology theories, the research adopts a quantitative design using purposive sampling. A total of private sector employees aged 21 and above participated through standardized instruments, including the 18-item Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale (1995) and a validated Work Performance Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and regression analysis. The findings indicate no statistically significant differences in PWB and WP across demographic groups (p > 0.05). However, regression analysis reveals a significant but negative relationship between PWB and WP (β = –0.232, p = 0.008), suggesting that higher PWB does not necessarily correspond to higher work performance in this sample. The discussion highlights the complex nature of this relationship, influenced by contextual factors such as stress levels, leadership support, and organizational culture. The study underscores the need for organizations to implement holistic mental health initiatives that balance emotional well-being with performance expectations. In conclusion, fostering psychological well-being remains essential for enhancing motivation, engagement, and long-term productivity among employees in Malaysia’s private sector.
Keywords
Psychological well-being, work performance, private sector
Downloads
References
1. Ab Hamid, Z., & Hassan, R. (2021). The influence of occupational stress and work engagement on job performance: Revisiting the inverted U-shaped relationship. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i4/9734 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ahmad, R. B., Rahman, N. H., & Fadzil, N. (2022). Psychological well-being and employee performance: Exploring the moderating role of emotional balance. Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(2), 102–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Boulet, M., & Parent-Lamarche, A. (2022). Paradoxical Effects of Teleworking on Workers’ Well-Being in the COVID-19 Context: A Comparison Between Different Public Administrations and the Private Sector. Public Personnel Management, 51(4), 430-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260221102943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Boulet, M., & Parent-Lamarche, A. (2022). Paradoxical effects of teleworking on workers’ well-being in the COVID-19 context: A comparison between different public administrations and the private sector. Public Personnel Management, 51(4), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260221102943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Danna, K., & Griffin, R. W. (2021). Well-being and organizational performance: A review of the theoretical framework. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 37–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Darvishmotevali, M., & Ali, F. (2020). Job insecurity, subjective well-being and job performance: The moderating role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dhanabhakyam, D.M., & Sarath., M. (2023). Psychological Well-being: Asystematic Literature Review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. 603-607. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Donaldson, S. I., van Zyl, L. E., & Donaldson, S. I. (2022). PERMA+4: A framework for work-related wellbeing, performance, and positive organizational psychology 2.0. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 817244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.817244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hakanen, J. J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2020). Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276, 306-317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hasan, K. (2024). Quantitative Methods in Social Science Research: Systematic Review of Content Analysis, Survey and Experiment Methodologies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4698175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Johnson, R., & Smith, P. (2022). Psychological well-being as a predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 32(1), 105-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Leka, S., & Nicholson, P. (2021). Promoting mental health at work: New developments and challenges. Safety Science, 135, 105119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mihalache, Mashiho, a Oli R. Mihalache. (2022). “How Workplace Support for the COVID ‐ 19 Pandemic and Personality Traits Affect Changes in Employees’ Affective Commitment to the Organization and Job‐related Wellbeing”. Human Resource Management 61, n. 3, 2022: 295314. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22082. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Peccei, Riccardo & Voorde, Karina. (2019). Human resource management–well‐being– performance research revisited: Past, present, and future. Human Resource Management Journal. 29. 10.1111/1748-8583.12254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Seligman, M.E.P. (2008), Positive Health. Applied Psychology, 57: 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00351.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Slavin, S. J., Schindler, D., Chibnall, J. T., Fendell, G., & Shoss, M. (2012). PERMA: a model for institutional leadership and culture change. Academic medicine. Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(11), 481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Zhang, Y., & Zhang, S. (2020). The relationship between psychological well-being and work performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 120, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
- Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
- A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
- Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
- A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being