Stress and Style: Investigating the Link between Leadership Approach and Employee Strain in Kuala Langat

Authors

Afiq Azri Mohd Ghani

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)

Sofiah Adilah Ahmad Foad

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)

Yuhanis Khalida A Rashid

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)

Angela Chan Nguk Fong

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)

Puteri Farahdiana Megat Suhaimi

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)

Az-Athirah Zubairi

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)

Thilaageshwary Thangadurai

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)

Nurul Nabila Ibrahim

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)

Rashidin Idris

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Science, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000300

Subject Category: Psychology

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 3667-3672

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-12

Accepted: 2025-10-19

Published: 2025-11-11

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between leadership styles and work stress among employees in Kuala Langat, Malaysia. Leadership strongly influences employee motivation, satisfaction, and well-being, yet ineffective leadership can become a major source of workplace stress. Guided by House and Mitchell’s (1975) Path-Goal Theory, this research explores how different leadership styles autocratic, transactional, transformational, laissez-faire, and democratic affect employee stress levels. A quantitative correlational design was employed, and data were collected from 250 employeesacross various job sectors using an online questionnaire. The survey incorporated the Vannsimpco Leadership Survey (VLS) and Work Stress Questionnaire (WSQ), both rated on a five-point Likert scale and demonstrating high reliability (α = .973 and .890). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27, applying descriptive statistics, correlation, and t-tests. Results revealed a moderate positive correlation between leadership style and work stress (r = .378, p < .001), indicating that certain leadership behaviors contribute to higher stress levels. Although 94.4% of respondents reported strong leadership presence, stress levels remained elevated, suggesting that leadership quality—not its presence—matters most. Authoritarian and laissez-faire styles were linked to greater stress, while transformational and democratic approaches enhanced trust and reduced tension. Gender differences in stress were non-significant (p = .215), indicating consistent effects across male and female employees. The study concludes that leadership style significantly affects employee stress and well-being. Organizations should cultivate empathetic, participative leadership and implement development programs focusing on emotional intelligence, communication, and inclusive management to promote healthier workplaces.

Keywords

Leadership style, transactional, autocratic, democratic, transformational, laissez faire, work stress

Downloads

References

1. Ariyani, D. (2021). Principal’s Innovation and Entrepreneurial Leadership to Establish a Positive Learning Environment. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.63 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Workplace Stressors? A Systematic Review and an Empirical Study Using a Person-Centred Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(8),5541. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Heub, A., Schaller, A., & Lange, M. (2024). Gender-specific perception of job stressors and resources: a structural equation model-based secondary analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1463868 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Milojević, S., Vesna Stojanović Aleksić, & Marko Slavković. (2024). “Direct Me or Leave Me”: The Effect of Leadership Style on Stress and Self-Efficacy of Healthcare Professionals. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 25–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Monalisa, A. E., Nugroho, A. P. P., La Base, D. M., & Kurniawan, V. R. (2024). Penanganan masalah stress kerja pada kasus kesehatan kerja dan penyakit akibat kerja [Dealing with work stress problems in cases of work health and work-related illnesses]. Journal of Evidence-Based Nursing and Public Health, 1(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Muna, A. N. (2022). Examining The Importance of Leadership Skills in Todays Life. International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR), 2(10), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v2i10.185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Murugiah, S. (2021). Leadership style and its impact on employee’s job-related stress a study based on Jaffna district secretariat in Jaffna district, Sri Lanka. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(4), 162–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Naef, U., Aslam, P., & Nawaz, R. R. (2024). The Influence of Transformational Leadership on Work Stress in Banking: Unveiling the Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Social & Organizational Matters, 3(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.56976/jsom.v3i1.51 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Schaper, S. J., & Stengel, A. (2022). Emotional stress responsivity of patients with IBS - a systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 153, 110694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110694 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Setiawan, R., Cavaliere, L. P. L., Navarro, E. R., Wisetsri, W., Jirayus, P., Chauhan, S., Tabuena, A. C., & Rajan, R. (2021). The impact of leadership styles on employees productivity in organizations: A comparative study among leadership styles. SSRN Electronic Journal, 26(1), 382–404. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3875252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Simanjorang, W. P., & Wahyanti, C. T. (2021). The Effect of Leadership Style and Workload on Work Stress at Pt Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Buana Agribisnis Saribudolok. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 5(4), 451. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v5i4.41433 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Stevens, D. (2020). Managerial Behaviors and the Impact on Employee Job Satisfaction of Telecommuters. Wilmington University (Delaware). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Universari, N., & Harsono, M. (2021). Antecedents and Consequences of Work Stress Behavior. Economics and Business Solutions Journal, 5(1), 46 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Zubairi, A. A., Nidzam, H. B. K., & Idris, R. (2024). Young and stressed: work pressure versus motivation among fresh graduates in selangor. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(6), 105-112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Heinbockel, H., Quaedflieg, C. W. E. M., Schneider, T. R., Engel, A. K., & Schwabe, L. (2021). Stress enhances emotional memory-related theta oscillations in the medial temporal lobe. Neurobiology of Stress, 15, 100383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Januarharyono, Y., Satibi, I., & Muliawaty, L. (2025). The Influence of Organizational Culture and Democratic Leadership Style on Employee Performance at the Trade and Industry Service of Bandung Regency. TEC EMPRESARIAL, 20(1), 164-177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ausat, A. M. A., Shafiq, M. A., Wafik, D., & López, N. A. S. (2024). The role of transformational leadership in improving employee psychological wellbeing: a review. Apollo: Journal of Tourism and Business, 2(1), 148-157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Akanji, B., Mordi, C., & Ajonbadi, H. A. (2020). The experiences of work-life balance, stress, and coping lifestyles of female professionals: insights from a developing country. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(4), 999-1015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Vann, B. A., Coleman, A. N., & Simpson, J. A. (2014). Development of the Vannsimpco Leadership Survey: A delination of hybrid leadership styles. SBS Journal of Applied Business Research, 3(1), 28-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Frantz, A., & Holmgren, K. (2019). The work stress questionnaire (WSQ)–reliability and face validity among male workers. BMC public health, 19(1), 1580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Stremersch, S., Camacho, N., Keko, E., & Wuyts, S. (2022). Grassroots innovation success: The role of self-determination and leadership style. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(2), 396-414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Martinez-Leon, I. M., Olmedo-Cifuentes, I., Martínez-Victoria, M., & Arcas-Lario, N. (2020). Leadership style and gender: A study of Spanish cooperatives. Sustainability, 12(12), 5107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Milojević, S., Aleksić, V. S., & Slavković, M. (2024). “Direct Me or Leave Me”: The Effect of Leadership Style on Stress and Self-Efficacy of Healthcare Professionals. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2020). P.112 Kuala Langat. Retrieved by 10 Oct 2025. https://open.dosm.gov.my/dashboard/kawasanku/Selangor/parlimen/P.112%20Kuala%20Lan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lin, C. P., Xian, J., Li, B., & Huang, H. (2020). Transformational leadership and employees’ thriving at work: the mediating roles of challenge-hindrance stressors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Martinez-Leon, I. M., Olmedo-Cifuentes, I., Martínez-Victoria, M., & Arcas-Lario, N. (2020). Leadership style and gender: A study of Spanish cooperatives. Sustainability, 12(12), 5107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ayuningtyas, E. A., Fadilah, D. O., Maskuri, M. A., & Marliah, S. (2022). Gaya Kepemimpinan Otokratis dan Stres Kerja dalam Mempengaruhi Turnover Intentation[Autocratic Leadership Style and Work Stress in Affecting Turnover Intention]. Jurnal Pengembangan Wiraswasta, 24(2), 75-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles