Bridging Ethics and Engagement: A Review of Psychological Safety in Ethical Leadership Research

Authors

Nor Ananiza Azhar

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Kedah Branch (Malaysia)

Mohd Firdaus Ruslan

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Kedah Branch (Malaysia)

Mohd Shafiz Saharan

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Kedah Branch (Malaysia)

Roseamilda Mansor

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Kedah Branch (Malaysia)

Norhafiza Hashim

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Kedah Branch (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG00193

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 9/14 | Page No: 2531-2538

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-10

Accepted: 2025-10-16

Published: 2025-11-12

Abstract

This review synthesises recent empirical studies that examine the relationship between ethical leadership, psychological safety, and employee engagement across diverse organisational and cultural contexts. Guided by the PRISMA framework, a systematic search of Scopus and Web of Science databases identified seven empirical studies that met the inclusion criteria. The findings reveal that ethical, benevolent, inclusive, and authentic forms of leadership consistently enhance trust, fairness, and psychological safety, which subsequently promote engagement, creativity, and innovation. Psychological safety emerges as the primary mediating mechanism through which moral conduct translates into behavioural and emotional engagement, supported by complementary mediators such as trust, job satisfaction, and workplace friendship. Cultural factors, including power distance and collectivism, influence the strength and expression of these relationships, suggesting that ethical leadership is interpreted differently across contexts. The review integrates insights from Social Exchange Theory and Social Learning Theory, framing ethical leadership as both a relational and cognitive process that shapes the moral–psychological climate of organisations. It concludes that ethical leadership should be viewed as a strategic capability that nurtures psychological safety, engagement, and well-being, particularly within the evolving realities of hybrid and cross-cultural workplaces.

Keywords

Ethical Leadership; Psychological Safety

Downloads

References

1. Aboud, A., & Niu, M. (2023). Ethical and inclusive leadership as enablers of psychological safety and employee voice: A multilevel analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(2), 101694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101694 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bai, Y., Lin, L., & Liu, J. (2021). Fostering creativity through ethical leadership: The roles of emotional trust and voice behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(4), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04365-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.70 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chaudhary, R., & Panda, C. (2018). Authentic leadership and creativity: The intervening role of psychological meaningfulness, safety and work engagement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 2071–2088. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2018-0055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Demirtas, O., Hannah, S. T., Gok, K., Arslan, A., & Capar, N. (2023). Moral consistency and ethical leadership: Examining leader credibility and psychological comfort. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05046-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dong, Y., Li, Y., & Roxas, B. (2024). Mapping the evolution of psychological safety research: A bibliometric review. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eluwole, K. K., Avci, T., & Dodd, A. (2022). Ethical leadership, trust and engagement: A study of the tourism and hospitality industry. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(9/10), 885–902. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-02-2021-0026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Guo, L. (2022). Ethical leadership, communication transparency and employee satisfaction: Evidence from Chinese organisations. Journal of Management Development, 41(9), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2020-0354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hassan, N. D., Azhar, N. A., Daud, M. M., Ruslan, M. F., (2017), ‘The Study of Ethical Work Behaviour and Job Performance’, ICOPS2017 e-Proceedings, 866. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Junaidi, J. (2024). The impact of ethical leadership on employee engagement: The mediating role of trust and job satisfaction in Indonesian SMEs. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-03-2023-0071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khairy, H., Yusoff, M., & Ramli, M. (2023). Benevolent leadership and employee engagement: The mediating role of workplace friendship and trust. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(4), 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-03-2022-0074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Khattak, S. R., Ahmad, S., & Ahmed, M. (2022). Inclusive leadership and employee voice: The role of psychological safety and leader identification in the Pakistani context. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(8), 1213–1230. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2021-0237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Liu, Y., Zhang, X., & Liu, J. (2023). Ethical leadership and innovative work behaviour: The sequential mediating role of psychological safety and work engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2022-0284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Meng, Y., Tan, J., & Li, Z. (2022). Ethical leadership and employee engagement: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37(7), 578–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2021-0121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ochiai, Y., & Otsuka, Y. (2022). Validation of a Japanese psychological safety scale: Exploring the role of fairness and leader support. Industrial Health, 60(5), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Qasim, M., Song, T., & Rashid, M. (2022). Ethical leadership and employee engagement: The mediating role of psychological safety and belongingness. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 9(4), 562–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-11-2021-0264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tan, L., & Ong, Y. (2024). Leading in hybrid workplaces: The role of ethical communication and fairness in sustaining employee trust. Management Decision, 62(3), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2023-0458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tu, Y., & Lu, X. (2023). Moral courage and ethical leadership: How leaders’ integrity fosters follower moral behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(2), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05080-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zainal, N. (2023). Ethical leadership, organisational culture and employee engagement: Evidence from Malaysian higher education. Personnel Review, 52(8), 1823–1841. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2022-0392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles