Board of Directors Competence and Market Performance in Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria

The study investigated how the board of directors’ competence affects market performance in Nigeria’s listed deposit money banks. The study specifically examined how strategic competence, measured by strategic oversight, vision, and stakeholder alignment, impacts Tobin’s Q, assessed the role of technical competence based on directors' education, financial knowledge, and professional background, and evaluated the influence of board effectiveness using meeting frequency and director shareholding on market value. This study adopted an ex-post facto design relying on existing data beyond the researcher’s manipulation. The population consisted of 13 deposit money banks listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group as of December 31, 2024, while a sample of 5 banks was purposively selected based on continuous listing and complete disclosures. Secondary data were obtained from published annual reports of the firms and NGX filings for the period 2015 to 2024, coinciding with the revision of corporate governance regulations. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics and panel regression, with the Prais–Winsten regression with panel-corrected standard errors employed to correct for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. The findings reveal that strategic competence has a significant positive effect on market performance, showing that boards with stronger oversight, visionary capability, and stakeholder alignment enhance firm valuation. Technical competence also exerts a significant positive effect, indicating that directors’ educational, financial, and professional expertise strengthen investor confidence and firm value. Similarly, board effectiveness, measured through meeting frequency and director shareholding, significantly improves Tobin’s Q, confirming that engaged and ownership-aligned boards enhance performance. Among the control variables, firm size was found to significantly increase market performance, while leverage had a significant negative effect. The study concludes that in the Nigerian context, market performance is strongly shaped by strategic competence, technical competence, and board effectiveness. It recommends that governance policies should prioritize directors with strong strategic vision and oversight, include members with proven technical expertise, promote board effectiveness through regular meetings and director shareholding, and that regulators should emphasize competence-based appointments in updated governance codes.

Board competence, Strategic competence, Technical competence

1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2012). Board structure and price informativeness. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agyemang, O. S., & Castellini, M. (2020). Corporate governance in an emerging economy: Does board structure matter for performance? Applied Economics, 52(34), 3743–3761. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1733477 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahn, S., & Kwon, H. (2024). Board diversity and market performance: Evidence from Asia-Pacific markets. Journal of Corporate Governance Research, 19(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcgr.2023.09.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahn, S., & Kwon, H. (2024). Board diversity, financial literacy, and firm market performance: An agency theory perspective. Journal of Corporate Governance Research, 19(1), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ali, I., & Usman, M. (2023). Strategic leadership of boards and corporate sustainability: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-09-2022-0125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ali, M., Qureshi, M. A., & Khan, A. (2017). Impact of board characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from non-financial listed companies in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 11(1), 232–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bhatt, P. R., & Bhatt, R. R. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(5),896–912. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2016-0068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Conger, J. A., Finegold, D., & Lawler, E. E. (2001). Appraising boardroom performance. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 136–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dlamini, S. B., & Agyapong, A. (2021). Strategic agility and market performance of SMEs in turbulent environments. Journal of African Business, 22(4), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2021.1879173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. García-Sánchez, I.-M., & García-Meca, E. (2020). Board attributes and corporate social responsibility engagement: The role of technical competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3999-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. García-Sánchez, I.-M., & García-Meca, E. (2020). Do talented managers invest more efficiently? The moderating role of corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Business Research, 110, 282-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M., Garcia-Meca, E., & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2020). Board of directors’ effectiveness and corporate social responsibility: A multi-methodological approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(2), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4062-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kalsie, A., & Shrivastav, S. M. (2016). Analysis of board size and firm performance: Evidence from NSE companies using panel data approach. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 9(2), 148–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686216666450 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lee, Y., Kim, J., & Park, S. (2021). Strategic capabilities and market valuation: An empirical analysis using Tobin's Q. Strategic Management Review, 12(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Letza, S., Sun, X., & Kirkbride, J. (2020). Revisiting agency theory and the role of board accountability: Toward a pluralistic governance framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(3), 241–255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mensah, M. O., & Darko, C. A. (2024). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm value: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. https://doi.org/10.1504/AJAAF.2024.100549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mensah, M. O., & Darko, C. A. (2024). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm value: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1504/AJAAF.2024.100549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mensah, M. O., & Darko, C. A. (2024). Strategic competence of corporate boards and firm market performance in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1504/AJCG.2024.100567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mensah, M. O., Opoku, A., & Darko, C. A. (2023). Board structure, firm capabilities, and market performance in Africa’s emerging economies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2022-0062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00591.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mishra, R. K., & Mohanty, P. (2014). Board effectiveness and firm performance: Evidence from India. IIMB Management Review, 26(3), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2014.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Naciti, V., Cesaroni, F., & Garzoni, A. (2021). Board of directors’ strategic role and innovation in family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C. (2007). Can directors impact performance? A case-based test of three theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00590.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Ahiauzu, A., Sejjaaka, S., & Ntayi, J. M. (2014). Board role performance in service firms and the applicability of the agency theory: A developing country perspective. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 15(3), 328–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-12-2012-0063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ntim, C. G., Lindop, S., & Thomas, D. A. (2015). Executive pay and performance: The moderating role of governance and ownership. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(2), 242–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2013-0075 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Omran, M. F., & El-Diftar, D. (2023). Investor sentiment, ESG performance and market valuation: Emerging market evidence. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(3), 2142–2160. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Petra, S. T. (2005). Do outside independent directors strengthen corporate boards? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510583476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rashid, A. (2018). Board meeting attendance and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 14(2), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2018.06.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ujunwa, A. (2016). Boards characteristics and the financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(5), 656–674. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211275587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ujunwa, A., Okoyeuzu, C., & Modebe, N. (2021). Corporate board effectiveness and firm performance in Africa: Do board meetings matter? Journal of African Business, 22(2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2020.1723643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Uwuigbe, U. (2011). Corporate governance and financial performance of banks: A study of listed banks in Nigeria. Covenant Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 4(1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Van der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2007). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender, and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 763–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00657. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yermack, D. (2004). Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. Journal of Finance, 59(5), 2281–2308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zhou, R., & Wang, L. (2022). Board expertise and firm performance under regulatory pressure: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Zhou, R., Wang, H., & Chen, L. (2022). Market-based performance implications of digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 146, 554–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors