Transformational and Transactional Leadership as Predictors of Business Survival: Evidence from the Nigerian Telecommunications Industry

This study examines the influence of transformational and transactional leadership styles on business survival within the Nigerian telecommunications industry, a sector characterized by intense competition, rapid technological change, and regulatory uncertainty. Drawing on Bass’s Transformational and Transactional Leadership Theories, the research investigates how leadership behaviors influence firms’ ability to sustain operations, adapt to market disruptions, and maintain competitive advantage. A quantitative research design was adopted, utilizing structured questionnaires distributed to 383 employees across major telecommunications firms MTN, Globacom, Airtel, and 9mobile. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the relationships between leadership styles and business survival.
Findings revealed that both transformational and transactional leadership styles have significant positive effects on business survival, though transformational leadership demonstrated a stronger influence by fostering adaptability, employee commitment, and innovative responses to environmental challenges. Transactional leadership, while more focused on performance monitoring and reward systems, contributed to short-term operational stability. The integration of both styles was found to enhance organizational resilience and adaptive capability, particularly in volatile and resource-constrained environments such as Nigeria’s telecommunications sector.
Theoretically, this study contributes to leadership and strategic management literature by empirically validating the dual impact of transformational and transactional leadership on organizational survival in an emerging market context. Practically, it provides insights for industry leaders and policymakers on developing leadership competencies that balance inspiration and structure. The paper concludes with recommendations for leadership development, resilience enhancement, and adaptive strategy formulation aimed at improving the long-term sustainability of telecommunications firms in developing economies.

Transformational leadership, Transactional leadership, Business survival

1. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Mind Garden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bande, B., Fernández-Ferrín, P., Varela, J. A., & Jaramillo, F. (2016). Emotions and salesperson propensity to leave: The effects of emotional intelligence and resilience. Industrial Marketing Management, 52(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Carmeli, A., & Markman, G. D. (2011). Capture, governance, and resilience: Strategy implications from the case of Microfinance in Africa. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 882–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kantur, D., & İşeri-Say, A. (2012). Organizational resilience: A conceptual integrative framework. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(6), 762–773. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2012.18.6.762 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., & Vomberg, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 1–47). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00951 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33(5), 774–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305562 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
• A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
• India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
• Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
• Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits