Public Willingness to Adapt to Fiscal Reforms in Small Island Developing States: Lessons for the Maldives

This review examines the public willingness to embrace fiscal reforms in Small Island Developing States (SIDS), with a particular focus on lessons applicable to the Maldives. The review synthesizes insights from peer-reviewed articles, institutional reports, and relevant case studies to explore the factors that influence public acceptance of fiscal policy changes in developing island contexts. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Literature was sourced from eight databases, including JSTOR, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, IMF eLibrary, World Bank, ADB Knowledge, and OECD iLibrary. Search terms combined variations of “fiscal reform,” “tax reform,” “public acceptance,” “public willingness,” and “SIDS” or “developing countries.” An initial pool of 3,310 results was narrowed down to 64 studies after screening titles, abstracts, and full texts. Inclusion criteria required relevance to public attitudes toward fiscal reform in SIDS or comparable contexts, while papers with only technical or macroeconomic analyses were excluded. A structured matrix was used to extract data thematically. PRISMA’s four-phase flow was followed to ensure transparency in article selection. Findings reveal that successful fiscal reforms in SIDS are driven more by political-economic factors such as institutional trust and equitable burden-sharing, than by technical design. Caribbean SIDS like Jamaica and Barbados offer practical models through their emphasis on stakeholder engagement and social protection mechanisms. The study highlights a critical gap in empirical research on public attitudes toward fiscal reform in SIDS and underscores the need for locally grounded, people-centered approaches in the Maldivian context.

Fiscal reform measures, systematic literature review, public willingness

1. Alesina, A., Favero, C., & Giavazzi, F. (2019). Austerity: When it works and when it doesn’t. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alt, J. E., Lassen, D. D., & Rose, S. (2006). The causes of fiscal transparency: Evidence from the U.S. states. IMF Staff Papers, 53(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.imfsp.9450002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andrews, M. (2013). The limits of institutional reform in development. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asian Development Bank. (2022). Maldives: Country partnership strategy 2020–2024. https://www.adb.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barro, R. J. (2002). Nothing is sacred: Economic ideas for the new millennium. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bartels, L. M., & Haselswerdt, J. (2023). Perceptions of taxing and spending: A survey experiment. Yale Law Journal, 132(6), 1501–1552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beetsma, R., Bluhm, B., Giuliodori, M., & Wierts, P. (2013). From budgetary recommendations to fiscal rules: EU fiscal surveillance over the years. Economic Policy, 28(76), 697–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bischoff, I., & Kanuha, A. (2019). How do communication and agency costs influence budget transparency and civic engagement? Public Choice, 180(3–4), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00674-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2018). Taxation and development: The weakest link? Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Braun, D., & Tausendpfund, M. (2014). The impact of the Euro crisis on citizens’ support for the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2014.885750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Busemeyer, M. R., Goerres, A., & Weschle, S. (2008). Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing. European Journal of Political Research, 48(4), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01817.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chen, L., & Gao, M. (2021). Digital government and citizen satisfaction: Evidence from China. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101582 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Clements, B., Gupta, S., & Inchauste, G. (Eds.). (2013). Energy subsidy reform: Lessons and implications. International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fölscher, A. (2010). Budget transparency: New frontiers in transparency and accountability. Open Society Foundations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gaventa, J., & McGee, R. (2013). The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(S1), S3–S28. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gupta, S., Clements, B., & Tiongson, E. R. (2014). Fiscal policy and income inequality (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. 14/02). International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hallerberg, M., Strauch, R. R., & von Hagen, J. (2009). Fiscal governance in Europe. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hartman, T. K., Stocks, T. V., Ahluwalia, R., Amaral-Garcia, S., Blavatnik, I., Klavina, D., … Nettle, D. (2022). The authoritarian dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspectives on Politics, 20(2), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721000046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Heinemann, F., & von Hagen, J. (2008). Fiscal consolidations: Quality, economic conditions, and success. Fiscal Studies, 29(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2008.00080.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hübscher, E., Sattler, T., & Wagner, M. (2021). Voter responses to fiscal austerity. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1751–1760. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000659 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. International Monetary Fund. (2020). Jamaica: IMF lending case study. https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/JAM/jamaica-lending-case-study [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. International Monetary Fund. (2021). Fiscal monitor: A fair shot. https://www.imf.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. International Monetary Fund. (2024). Small states monitor. https://www.imf.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. International Monetary Fund. (2025). Fiscal monitor: Fiscal policy under uncertainty. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2025/04/23/fiscal-monitor-April-2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kallestrup, M. M. (2024). Do fiscal consolidations reduce government approval? European Political Science Review, 16(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Limberg, J. (2020). What’s fair? Preferences for tax progressivity in the wake of the financial crisis. Journal of Public Policy, 40(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X18000492 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2008). Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506160810862928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Maldives Policy Think Tank. (2024). Women and fiscal reform: The dawn of austerity in the Maldives. https://maldivespolicythinktank.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Manning, N., & Mukherjee, R. (2000). Public officials and their institutional environment. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nguyen, T. D., Vu, H. L., & Tran, K. M. (2022). Distributional effects of fiscal policy in emerging economies. Journal of Development Economics, 156, 102821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102821 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Restoring public trust in government: Key challenges and recommendations. https://www.oecd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Orbitax. (2024). Maldives to increase GST rate for tourism sector. https://orbitax.com/news/archive.php/Maldives-to-Increase-GST-Rate--57015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Schick, A. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand’s reforms. The World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/13.1.123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tanzi, V. (2011). Government versus markets: The changing economic role of the state. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. World Bank. (2023). Maldives economic update: Navigating fiscal consolidation. https://www.worldbank.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. World Bank. (2023). Statement by David Sislen, regional country director for Maldives, Nepal and Sri Lanka. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/maldives/publication/maldives-development-update-2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. World Bank. (2024, October 9). Maldives needs urgent, comprehensive economic reforms to maintain development progress. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2024/10/09/maldives-needs-urgent-comprehensive-economic-reforms-to-maintain-development-progress [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark