Academic Achievement, Enthusiasm and Attitude of High School Students Regarding Quizizz as an Educational Gamification Tool for Physics
Authors
Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Pusat Tamhidi, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Nilai, Malaysia (Malaysia)
School of Engineering & Computing, Department Electrical and Electronics, MILA University, Nilai (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0664
Subject Category: Physical Education
Volume/Issue: 9/26 | Page No: 8778-8799
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-20
Accepted: 2025-10-28
Published: 2025-11-15
Abstract
Educational gamification is one example of game-based learning that has been applied in the teaching and learning process. Students can effectively practice their skills and connect lessons to real-life problems. However, there is still limited usage of gamification in teaching and learning in schools. The study's goals were to determine how well students performed in Physics when learning in traditional classrooms versus gamified classrooms, how excited the students were about learning Physics, how they felt about the experience, and whether they thought it was enjoyable to be in a gamified classroom. A quasi-experimental design was used to collect the data. 54 Form 4 students were in the treatment group, which took a game-based test, and the control group, which took a paper-and-pencil test. Only the experimental group received a set of questionnaires. The data from both results were recorded and analysed using SPSS version 25. The data obtained from the independent sample t-test concludes that students in the gamified classroom have a higher mean score (mean = 5.78) compared to traditional learning (mean = 4.63). A paired sample t-test on students' enthusiasm before and after using Quizizz showed that gamification significantly improved their enthusiasm, with a p-value less than 0.05. Additionally, it can be argued that Quizizz supports students' attitudes towards learning Physics, as 13 out of 15 questions had a p-value less than 0.05. Interestingly, there was no difference in mean attitude in using Quizizz in terms of gender, p-value = 0.196. The descriptive analysis reveals that the students in the treatment group had a positive perception of using Quizizz for Physics questions. Initially, most students selected strongly agree and agree. The findings suggest that the gamified test enhanced their performance, attitude, and enthusiasm and fostered a competitive learning environment.
Keywords
Academic achievement educational gamification Enthusiasm for learning physics
Downloads
References
1. Akhtar (2016). Research Design. Research in Social Science: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alhassan Marifa, H., Abdullai Abukari, M., Ayelsoma Samari, J., Dorsah, P., & Abudu, F. (2023). Students’ Perceptions of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Chemistry Teachers on the Concept of Hybridization. Science Journal of Education, 11(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20231102.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Alzahrani, A. I., Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., Alfarraj, O., & Alalwan, N. (2017). Extending the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to explain online game playing among Malaysian undergraduate students. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Aristana, M. D. W., & Ardiana, D. P. Y. (2021). Gamification design for high school student with unstable internet connection during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1810(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1810/1/012057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Basuki, Y., & Hidayati, Y. N. (2019). Kahoot! or Quizizz: the Students’ Perspectives. ELLIC, July. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The Effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on the Student’s Perception in the Classrooms Response System. International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904957 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cheong, C., Filippou, J., & Cheong, F. (2014). Towards the Gamification of Learning: Investigating Student Perceptions of Game Elements. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(3), 233–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Cherry, K. (2023). Motivation: The Driving Force Behind Our Actions. Https://Www.Verywellmind.Com/. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-motivation-2795378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Dr. Chris Drew. (2023). 39 Academic Achievement Examples (2023). Helpfulprofessor.Com. https://helpfulprofessor.com/academic-achievement-examples/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Eryılmaz, A., Yıldız, İ., & Akın, S. (2011). Investigating of Relationships between Attitudes towards Physics Laboratories, Motivation and Amotivation for the Class Engagement. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(Jan (Special Issue)), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v3isi.123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Faiella, F., & Ricciardi, M. (2015). Gamification and lerning: A review of issues and research. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(3), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Furió, D., Juan, M.-C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2014). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: A comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Shawn M. Glynn, Gita Taasoobshirazi, Peggy Brickman (2008). Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Guy, G. M., Cornick, J., & Beckford, I. (2015). More than Math: On the Affective Domain in Developmental Mathematics. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090207 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015). Why do people use gamification services? International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hong, G. Y., & Masood, M. (2014). Effects of Gamification on Lower Secondary School Students’ Motivation and Engagement. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 8(12), 3757–3764. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Jayasinghe, U., & Dharmaratne, A. (2013). Game Based Learning vs. Gamification from the Higher Education Students’ Perspective. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, (TALE), August, 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2013.6654524 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Joseph, G. (2013). A Study On School Factors Influencing Tudents’attitudes Towards Learning Mathematics In The Community Secondary Schools In Tanzania: The Case Of Bukoba Municipal Council In Kagera Region. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Legaki, N. Z., Karpouzis, K., Assimakopoulos, V., & Hamari, J. (2021). Gamification to avoid cognitive biases: An experiment of gamifying a forecasting course. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120725 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lestari, Ti. W. (2019). Kahoot! and Quizizz: A comparative study on the implementation of e-learning application toward student’s motivation. LinguA-LiterA : Journal of English Language Teaching Learning and Literature, 2(2), 13–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lim, T. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Teachers’ Perception towards the Use of Quizizz in the Teaching and Learning of English: A Systematic Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116436 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. MacFarlane, K., & Woolfson, L. M. (2013). Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the inclusion of children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools : an application of the theory of planned behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Mensah, J. K., M., O., & A., K. (2013). Student attitude towards Mathematics and performance: Does the teacher attitude matter? Journal of Education and Practice, 4(June), 132–139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the Physics classroom: A Review of the Research on the Participation of Girls in Physics. In Institute of Physics Report (Issue June). https://www.iop.org/sites/default/files/2019-04/girls-in-the-physics-classroom.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Pham, A. T. (2022). University Students’ Attitudes towards the Application of Quizizz in Learning English as a Foreign Language. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(19), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i19.32235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Saleem, A. N., Noori, N. M., & Ozdamli, F. (2021). Gamification Applications in E-learning: A Literature Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09487-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Saleh, S. (2014). Malaysian students’ motivation towards Physics learning. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(4), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Salleh, I. (2022). Tanam minat murid terhadap sains sejak kecil. Www.Bharian.Com.My. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/pendidikan/2022/04/949644/tanam-minat-murid-terhadap-sains-sejak-kecil [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Sarmah, A., & Puri, P. (2014). Attitude towards Mathematics of the Students Studying in Diploma Engineering Institute (Polytechnic) of Sikkim. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4(6), 06–10. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04630610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Coelho, J. A. P. de M., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Syyeda, F. (2016). Understanding Attitudes Towards Mathematics ( ATM ) using a Multi- modal Model : An Exploratory Case Study with Secondary School Children in England. CORERJ: Cambridge Open-Review Educational Research e-Journal, 3(September). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Tondello, G. F., Mora, A., Marczewski, A., & Nacke, L. E. (2019). Empirical validation of the Gamification User Types Hexad scale in English and Spanish. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 127(July 2018), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.10.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Trajkovik, V., Malinovski, T., Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., & Vasileva, M. (2018). Traditional games in elementary school: Relationships of student’s personality traits, motivation and experience with learning outcomes. PLoS ONE, 13(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Veloo, A., Nor, R., & Khalid, R. (2015). Attitude towards Physics and Additional Mathematics Achievement towards Physics Achievement. International Education Studies, 8(3), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Yokoyama, S. (2019). Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in Online Learning: A Mini review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(January), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02794 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Zhang, J., & Zhang, L. (2020). Computer Simulation Research of Desk Design Based on ABC Attitude Theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1578(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1578/1/012075 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. 2024 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Combined and Isolated Effect of SAQ Training and Resistance Training on Agility and Flexibility among Badminton Players
- Importance of Ashtanga Yoga in Physical Education and Mental Health
- Navigating the Path of Exceptional Parenting: An Exploration of Experiences among Parents of Para-Athletes
- Effects of a 12-Week Football Intervention on Mental Health and Psychological Resilience in Secondary School Students