Work-From-Home Arrangements: Narratives of Government Employees

This qualitative, phenomenological study explored the lived experience of fifteen Davao del Sur provincial governments employees who engaged in a work-from-home (WFH) arrangement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using purposive sampling and expert-validated guide questions, researchers gathered personal stories and perspective, which were then analyzed using thematic analysis. The study’s findings largely indicated positive general ratings for the WFH set up. Employees valued the improved work-life balance, autonomy, and flexibility it provided.

Government employees, public administrations

1. Agba, m. S., agba, a. O., & chukwurah, d. C. J. (2021). Covid-19 pandemic and workplace adjustments/decentralization: A focus on teleworking in the new normal. Brain. Broad research in artificial intelligence and neuroscience, 11(4), 185–200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alashwali, e., peca, j., lanyon, m., & cranor, l. (2024). Work from home and privacy challenges: What do workers face and what are they doing about it? Arxiv preprint arxiv:2407.10094. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aziz, r., munap, r., nor, s. M., zakir, n. F. M., jufri, n. N., & kadir, m. N. A. A. (2023). A case study of a service organisation in malaysia: Employees’ work-life balance, work commitment & leadership style on job satisfaction during remote working. Adv. Int. J. Bus. Entrep. Smes, 5(15), 31–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beck, m. J., & hensher, d. A. (2020). Insights into the impact of covid-19 on household travel and activities in australia–the early days under restrictions. Transport policy, 96, 76–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bellmann, l., & hübler, o. (2021). Working from home, job satisfaction and work–life balance–robust or heterogeneous links? International journal of manpower, 42(3), 424–441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bergefurt, l., appel-meulenbroek, r., maris, c., arentze, t., weijs-perrée, m., & de kort, y. (2023). The influence of distractions of the home-work environment on mental health during the covid-19 pandemic. Ergonomics, 66(1), 16–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bryant, j. P. (2024). Understanding the impact of telework on government employee satisfaction and retention (doctoral dissertation, california state university, northridge). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Davies, a. (2021). Covid-19 and ict-supported remote working: Opportunities for rural economies. World, 2(1), 139–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Denieffe, s. (2020). Commentary: Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in nursing: Jrn, 25(8), 662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Earl-wilcox, k. A. (2021). Autonomy and engagement as intrinsic motivation factors for remote workers (doctoral dissertation, grand canyon university). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Even, a. M. (2023). Self-leadership is the key to remote worker success: Self-discipline with a purpose. In examining applied multicultural industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 39–57). Igi global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ferrara, b., pansini, m., de vincenzi, c., buonomo, i., & benevene, p. (2022). Investigating the role of remote working on employees’ performance and well-being: An evidence-based systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(19), 12373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Franken, e., bentley, t., shafaei, a., farr-wharton, b., onnis, l. A., & omari, m. (2021). Forced flexibility and remote working: Opportunities and challenges in the new normal. Journal of management & organization, 27(6), 1131–1149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lagura, g. (2017). E-governance in davao region: An assessment of city government websites. Journal of public administration and governance, 7(3), pages 133-153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Doi:Http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v7i3.11515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Haque, s. M. S. (2023). The impact of remote work on hr practices: Navigating challenges, embracing opportunities. European journal of human resource management studies, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hayden, j. (2022). The predictive value of conscientiousness on the job satisfaction of remote workers (doctoral dissertation, grand canyon university). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hennink, m., hutter, i., & bailey, a. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hopkins, j., & bardoel, a. (2023). The future is hybrid: How organisations are designing and supporting sustainable hybrid work models in post-pandemic australia. Sustainability, 15(4), 3086. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hunsicker, j. (2023). Remote working arrangements in the context of employee engagement and motivation among remote and on-site employees: A quantitative comparison (doctoral dissertation, saint leo university). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kaushik, m. (2020). Post covid-19 world-a paradigm shift at workplace. Test eng. Manag, 83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kaushik, m., & guleria, n. (2020). The impact of pandemic covid-19 in workplace. European journal of business and management, 12(15), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khorakian, a., jahangir, m., rahi, s., eslami, g., & muterera, j. (2024). Remote working and work performance during the covid-19 pandemic: The role of remote work satisfaction, digital literacy, and cyberslacking. Behaviour & information technology, 43(10), 1938–1956. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Larkin, m., shaw, r., & flowers, p. (2019). Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research. Qualitative research in psychology, 16(2), 182–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lindberg, m., & steinmann, m. (2023). Navigating the new normal: Supporting motivation in the remote workplace: From a self determination theory. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Loreto, b. B. L., de azevedo, s. C., da silva, a. G., malloy-diniz, l. F., ornell, f., trés, l. M. A. M., ... & de castro, m. N. (2022). Well-being at work, productivity, and coping with stress during the covid-19 pandemic. Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy, 44, e20210250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Monzani, l., mateu, g., ripoll, p., lira, e., & peiro, j. M. (2022). Managing in the new normal: Positive management practices elicit higher goal attainment, goal commitment, and perceived task efficacy than traditional management practices in remote work settings. An experimental study. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 914616. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mousa, m., arslan, a., ullah, a., tarba, s., & cooper, c. (2024). Work from home feasibility and challenges for public sector employees in a developing country. Journal of organizational effectiveness: People and performance, 12(5), 41–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Newman, s. A., & ford, r. C. (2021). Five steps to leading your team in the virtual covid-19 workplace. Organizational dynamics, 50(1), 100802. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nicola, m., alsafi, z., sohrabi, c., kerwan, a., al-jabir, a., iosifidis, c., ... & agha, r. (2020). The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (covid-19): A review. International journal of surgery, 78, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nikou, s., de reuver, m., & mahboob kanafi, m. (2022). Workplace literacy skills—how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology. Journal of documentation, 78(7), 371–391. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nkem, l. (2024). Impact of technology readiness and acceptance on employee performance in remote work environments (doctoral dissertation, the chicago school of professional psychology). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Novita, w., & edriani, d. (2024). Measuring employee performance in the age of remote work: Key metrics and challenges. Escalate: Economics and business journal, 2(02), 54–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Odunayo, h., & fagbemide, o. (2024). The impact of remote work on organizational efficiency: Lessons from nigerian telecommunications industry. Icccm journal of social sciences and humanities, 3(1), 46–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Olowu, a. (2024). The challenge of capacity building and development in nigeria’s public sector. African renaissance, 2024(si1), 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Onyekwere, l. A. (2024). Digital divide in remote work among employees and organizational effectiveness in south-south nigeria. South asian research journal of humanities and social sciences, 6(4), 142–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Raghavan, a., demircioglu, m.a., & orazgaliyev, s. (2021). Covid-19 and the new normal of organizations and employees: An overview. Sustainability, 13(21), 11942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Richardson, b. (2023). Strategies for promoting inclusion and employee engagement to improve remote teams’ performance (doctoral dissertation, walden university). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Rinaldo, r., & whalen, i. M. (2023). Amplifying inequalities: Gendered perceptions of work flexibility and the division of household labor during the covid‐19 pandemic. Gender, work & organization, 30(6), 1922–1940. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Rose, p. A., & brown, s. (2021). Reconstructing attitudes towards work from home during covid-19: A survey of south korean managers. Behavioral sciences, 11(12), 163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Shamsub, h. (2024). Okrs for remote work: Achieving success and productivity in a virtual environment. Arisia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sheveleva, a., & rogov, e. (2021). Organization of remote work in the context of digitalization. In e3s web of conferences (vol. 273, p. 12042). Edp sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Shockley, k. M., allen, t. D., dodd, h., & waiwood, a. M. (2021). Remote worker communication during covid-19: The role of quantity, quality, and supervisor expectation-setting. Journal of applied psychology, 106(10), 1466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Sims, h., alvarez, c., grant, k., walczak, j., cooper, l. A., & ibe, c. A. (2022). Frontline healthcare workers experiences and challenges with in-person and remote work during the covid-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Frontiers in public health, 10, 983414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Smite, d., moe, n. B., hildrum, j., gonzalez-huerta, j., & mendez, d. (2023). Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies. Journal of systems and software, 195, 111552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Sooriyapperuma, s. A. A. W., & nawarathna, c. L. K. (2021). Determinants of employees’ job satisfaction when working from home; with particular reference to the telecommunication and software companies in colombo district sri lanka. Asian journal of social sciences and management technology, 3(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Sultana, u. S., abdullah, n. E. T. M., mok, e. T., hossain, j., sherief, s. R., iskandar, m. L., & andalib, t. W. (2021). Exploring motivation and commitment on job satisfaction and employee performance in work from home (wfh) perspective. Psychology and education, 58(3), 2411–2424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Thomas, f. B. (2022). The role of purposive sampling technique as a tool for informal choices in a social sciences in research methods. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Trippner-hrabi, j., chądzyński, j., & kam, a. (2024). Enhancing goal achievement during remote work in public utility services: Unveiling the significance of the pdca deming cycle. In ethics and innovation in public administration (pp. 299–311). Cham: Springer nature switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Van zoonen, w., sivunen, a., blomqvist, k., olsson, t., ropponen, a., henttonen, k., & vartiainen, m. (2021). Factors influencing adjustment to remote work: Employees’ initial responses to the covid-19 pandemic. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(13), 6966. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Yan, k., xia, e., li, j., & gao, f. (2024). Do teams need their employees to work remotely? A simulation analysis based on a multi-layer interactive system. Expert systems with applications, 236, 121372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Zhang, r. P., & bowen, p. (2021). Work-family role blurring and conflict among south african construction professionals. Construction management and economics, 39(6), 475–492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark