The Danger of the Confluence of Democracy and Christianity

Christianity and democracy are two of the most significant forces shaping human civilization. Yet, their convergence can also generate profound dangers, potentially eroding state secularism and undermining the principle of equal rights. This article examines the complex interaction between these two traditions, arguing that the contemporary fusion of Christianity and democratic politics—what I call the new fusionism—risks producing exclusion and polarization rather than harmony. Historically intertwined, this relationship has evolved into a deeper entanglement, leading to greater interference of religious norms in public life and the marginalization of minority groups within democratic processes. Furthermore, the political manipulation of Christian ideas—such as invoking religious rhetoric to justify discriminatory policies or mobilize sectarian constituencies—intensifies social divisions and weakens democratic institutions. Drawing on critical analysis and case studies, this paper contends that, while cooperation between Christianity and democracy can enrich public life, it also carries the potential for intolerance and radicalization. Ultimately, the argument calls for a renewed commitment to a secular and inclusive civic sphere, where democracy safeguards the dignity and representation of all people without privileging any faith.

Christianity and Democracy, equal rights,

1. Audi, Robert. Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 45–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bitzer, Lloyd F. “Political Rhetoric.” In Landmark Essays on Contemporary Rhetoric, 1–22. New York: Routledge, 2020. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003059226-1/political-rhetoric-lloyd-bitzer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Casanova, José. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994, pp. 215–242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dueck, A. C. The Recovery of the Moral Tradition: The New Fusionism in Christian Political Thought. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2018, 91–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fung, Archon. “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future.” Public Administration Review 75, no. 4 (2015): 513–522. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/puar.12361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gentile, Emilio. Politics as Religion. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2020. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5575937&publisher=FZO137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gorski, Philip S., and Samuel L. Perry. The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022, 33–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hajnal, Zoltan, Nazita Lajevardi, and Lindsay Nielson. “Voter Identification Laws and the Suppression of Minority Votes.” The Journal of Politics 79, no. 2 (2017): 363–379. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/688343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Judge, Melanie. “Navigating Paradox: Towards a Conceptual Framework for Activism at the Intersection of Religion and Sexuality.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 76, no. 3 (2020). https://www.ajol.info/index.php/hts/article/view/212576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kaczor, Christopher. The Ethics of Abortion: Women's Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice. New York: Routledge, 2022, 56–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ketcham, Ralph. The Idea of Democracy in the Modern Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2021. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=YXSrEAAAQBAJ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kim, S. M., J. B. Banawiratma, and D. Sofjan. “Religious Pluralism Discourse in the Public Sphere of Indonesia: A Critical Application of Communicative Action Theory to Inter-Religious Dialogue.” Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama 10, no. 2 (2020): 158–188. https://jurnalfuf.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/religio/article/view/1307. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Laborde, Cécile. Liberalism’s Religion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017, 145–178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Larsson, Tomas. “Monkish Politics in Southeast Asia: Religious Disenfranchisement in Comparative and Theoretical Perspective.” Modern Asian Studies 49, no. 1 (2015): 40–82. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-asian-studies/article/monkish-politics-in-southeast-asia-religious-disenfranchisement-in-comparative-and-theoretical-perspective/AFCDDEBA3E44FED407432EF7E84BBB62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mahmood, Saba. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2015. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5563845&publisher=FZO137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Maples, Grant W. Student Religious Accommodation Policies and Non-Christian College Student Perceptions of Institutional Support: A Mixed Methods Dissertation. North Carolina State University, 2023. https://search.proquest.com/openview/763a858b9416df856c0bc01db549db10/1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Martin, Dale B. Slavery as Salvation: The Metaphor of Slavery in Pauline Christianity. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2021. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=pkEpEAAAQBAJ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. McCoy, Jennifer, Tahmina Rahman, and Murat Somer. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018): 16–42. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0002764218759576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. McGrath, Alister E. The Intellectual Origins of the European Reformation. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Nxl8V_aAvpAC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World.New York: Penguin Press, 2009, 202–231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mendus, Susan. Politics and Morality. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009, 60–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Perreau-Saussine, Emile. Catholicism and Democracy: An Essay in the History of Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IsyZEAAAQBAJ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Perry, Samuel L. “Christian Nationalism and Polarization in American Politics.” Sociology of Religion 83, no. 1 (2022): 1–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Philpott, Daniel. Religious Freedom in Islam: The Fate of a Universal Human Right in the Muslim World Today.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 176–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Robbins, Ira P. “The Obsolescence of Blue Laws in the 21st Century.” Stanford Law & Policy Review 33 (2022): 289. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3203&context=facsch_lawrev. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rosenblum, Nancy L. Obligations of Citizenship and Demands of Faith: Religious Accommodation in Pluralist Democracies. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2021. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5641941&publisher=FZO137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Roy, Olivier. Holy Ignorance: When Religion and Culture Part Ways. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=yQMqBgAAQBAJ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Vol. 2: The Age of Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, 250–277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Smith, Christian. Disruptive Religion: The Force of Faith in Social Movement Activism. New York: Routledge, 2014. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315022147&type=googlepdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Smith, Donald E. India as a Secular State. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8zXWCgAAQBAJ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Stepan, Alfred. “Religion, Democracy, and the ‘Twin Tolerations.’” Journal of Democracy 11, no. 4 (2000): 37–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007, 512–513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Westwood, Sue. “Can Religious Social Workers Practice Affirmatively with LGBTQ+ Clients? Exploring the Impact of Beliefs on Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 52, no. 1 (2022): 162–179. https://academic.oup.com/bjsw/article-abstract/52/1/162/6253507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wilson, Erin K. After Secularism: Rethinking Religion in Global Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, 162–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.