Hygiene and Motivation in the Workplace: A PRISMA Systematic Review of Herzberg’s Two-Factor Applications

Authors

Wang Kehui

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia. (Malaysia)

Ang Hong Loong

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia. (Malaysia)

Pang Yeng Yuan

Department of Accountancy and Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology (TAR UMT) Sabah Branch, Malaysia. (Malaysia)

Li Xinyue

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia. (Malaysia)

Edith Clerisa Marimo

National Anti-Drugs Agency, Malaysia. (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000533

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 6527-6539

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-02

Accepted: 2025-11-08

Published: 2025-11-18

Abstract

The motivation of employees, and hygiene factors are very important aspects of organizations much more so in service types of organizations and those that deal with the care of animals. Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory has also been adopted by many but there is not much in the way of a comprehensive synthesis of its utility across various types of work settings. This research applies the PRISMA process for conducting a review of global literature regarding hygiene and motivator factors in the realm of job satisfaction, attendance, and compliance with hygiene. Following PRISMA 2020, a systematic review was performed. The search in databases was conducted using the specific concepts of Herzberg’s theory, motivation and hygiene practices seeking for peer-reviewed research from 2010 to 2024. A total of 93 studies were initially identified, and after screening for relevance, 50 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. A synthesis of 50 reviewed studies showed moderate positive relationships, with average correlations of r = 0.42 for motivator factors and r = 0.36 for hygiene factors. These values reflect observed patterns across the literature, confirming that motivators more strongly influence satisfaction, while hygiene factors maintain stability. Thematic synthesis was employed to evaluate the impact of hygiene, motivator, and mixed factors on job satisfaction and performance of the studies reviewed. Evidence suggests that hygiene factors, like company policy and administration, supervision, and salary, are the key factors in preventing dissatisfaction, motivation factors, such as achievement, recognition, and responsibility, account for developing satisfaction and retaining employees. This PRISMA-guided review affirms the relevancy of Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory in service but emphasizes the nature of the service context. The combination of hygiene factors and motivators gives us a much steadier model for workforce motivation and retention, within the context of modern workplaces. Longitudinal and comparative studies are needed in the future to further test t hese interactions on different cultural and sectorial environments.

Keywords

PRISMA, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, Employee Motivation, Hygiene Factors

Downloads

References

1. Aggarwal, P. J. (2023). Service quality dimensions in the context of herzberg two factor theory. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 14 (1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijabim.325231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed, A. A., & Sultan, K. (2022). Application of two-factor theory of motivation by Fredrick herzberg: A case of female workers serving Pakistani media organizations. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2022(v-iv).03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amrullah, M. F., & Nasution, Y. (2025). The influence of motivator factors and hygiene factors on job satisfaction and intention to stay of employees between the directorate general of the ministry of trade. Eduvest, 5 (9), 10897-10915. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i9.51236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ang, H. L., Lada, S., & Wang, K. (2024). Employee motivational factors and job satisfaction: A conceptual study. https://doi.org/10.21009/isc-beam.011.73 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ann, S., & Blum, S. C. (2020). Motivating senior employees in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32 (1), 324-346.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-08-2018-0685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ann, S., & Choi, H. (2023). Motivating housekeeping staff in the lodging industry in Jordan. Tourism hospitality management, 29 (1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.29.1.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ann, S., Choi, H. S., Blum, S. C., & Yu, J. S. (2014). Retesting herzberg`s two-factor theory among the housekeeping staff in the lodging industry in the republic of Korea. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Arka ‘a, A. (2018). The effect of motivator factors and hygiene factors on employee work motivation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Balmer, S., & Baum, T. (1993). Applying herzberg’s hygiene factors to the changing accommodation environment. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 5 (2), 32-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596119310036629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bexheti, L., & Bexheti, A. (2016). The impact of herzberg's two factor theory and efficiency at work. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.26417/EJMS.V1I2.P378-385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bhatt, N., Chitranshi, J., & Mehta, M. (2022). Testing herzberg’s two factor theory on millennials. CARDIOMETRY (22), 231-236. https://doi.org/10.18137/cardiometry.2022.22.231236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chakravorty, D., Ahmed, J. U., & Chakrabarty, D. (2023). Assessing herzberg's theory in private banking: A competency study. International journal of science and research. https://doi.org/10.21275/sr231124183219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chan, J. K. L., & Baum, T. (2007). Researching consumer satisfaction: An extension of herzberg's motivator and hygiene factor theory. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 23 (1), 71-83.https://doi.org/10.1300/J073V23N01_06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. El-Hamid, M. A., Ibrahim, H., El-Maaty, H. A., & Mohamed, A. E. (n.d.). The application of the herzberg's motivation theory on employees' performance in the five stars hotels in Cairo and Giza (hygiene factors). https://doi.org/10.21608/ejth.2017.274274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Erhan, T., & Bayrakçi, E. (2022). Herzberg’i̇n çi̇ft faktör teori̇si̇: Turi̇zm çalişanlari üzeri̇ndefenomenoloji̇k bi̇r araştirma. Uygulamalı ekonomi ve sosyal bilimler dergisinull, 77-99.https://doi.org/10.46959/jeess.1060470 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fabjan, D., Lovec, N., & Čivre, Ž. (2013). Herzberg’s two factor theory of work motivation: The case of tourism employees. Management Science, 8 (3), 219-232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ghimire, B., Dahal, R. K., Karki, D., & Joshi, S. P. (2024). Motivators and hygiene factors affecting academics in nepalese higher education institutions: Applying herzberg’s two-factor theory. Journal of business and social sciences research, 9 (2), 1-16.https://doi.org/10.3126/jbssr.v9i2.72406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Giordani, A. T., Sonobe, H. M., Ezaias, G. M., Valério, M. A., & Andrade, D. D. (2016). Nursing adherence to hand hygiene according herzberg's hygiene factors. Journal of Nursing Ufpe Online, 10 (2), 600-607. https://doi.org/10.5205/8495 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hayes, M. (2011). Understanding disengagement. The employee's story. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jaffar, H. S., Munir, A., & Waqas, M. (2024). Assessing the impact of herzberg’s two-factor motivation theory on job satisfaction: A study of employees in the Punjab healthcare commission. Sustainable business and society in emerging economies, 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v6i3.3148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jensen, J. M. (2007). An empirical investigation of the relationships between hygiene factors, motivators, satisfaction, and response among visitors to zoos and aquaria. Tourism Review International, 11 (3), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.3727/154427207783948784 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Juariyah, L., & Saktian, I. R. (2018). Does motivators determine employees’ job satisfaction? Testing Herzberg theory of motivation in Indonesian café and restaurant context. KnE Social Sciences, 3 (3), 482-490. https://doi.org/10.18502/KSS.V3I3.1905 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khan, M. U. R., Khalid, M., Tabassum, M., Hamza, M., Shah, H., Begum, S., & Hashmi, M. Q. (2025). The impact of hygiene and motivator factors on job satisfaction: A case study of laboratory professionals in Islamabad. Indus journal of bioscience research., 3 (7), 274-280.https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i7.1810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Korkmazer, F., & Aksoy, A. (2017). Herzberg’i̇n hi̇jyen faktörleri̇ni̇n çalişanlarin i̇şten ayrilmadavranişlarina etki̇si̇ne yöneli̇k bi̇r araştirma. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim FakültesiDergisi, 17 (2), 821-833. https://doi.org/10.17240/AIBUEFD.2017.17.30227-326599 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kotni, V. P., & Karumuri, V. (2018). Application of herzberg two-factor theory model for motivating retail salesforce. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kudaibergenov, Z., Bolatova, B., Kurmanalina, A., & Balginova, K. (2024). Analyzing the influence of hygienic and motivating factors on employee performance: Insights of HRM practices from university and industry settings. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian research. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v11i2.1429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lee, B. H., Lee, C., Choi, I., & Kim, J. (2022). Analyzing determinants of job satisfaction based on two-factor theory. Sustainability, 14 (19), 12557-12557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lira, K. P., & Bitar, A. B. (2023). Os fatores motivadores de herzberg como diferencial estratégicoem uma distribuidora de reagentes. Revista Contemporânea. https://doi.org/10.56083/rcv3n12-239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Martínez, I., Nava, V. X., Rivera, B. R. G., Sauri-Alpuche, G., Tovar, E., & Anzola-González, E. C. (2025). Hygiene and motivation as predictors of satisfaction and interest in staying in the company. RGSA: Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 19 (3), e011723-e011723.https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v19n3-115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Miao, Z. (2010). Application of two-factor theory in the retail of the customer satisfaction management. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-5811.2010.04.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mitsakis, M., & Galanski, M. (2022). An empirical examination of Herzberg’s theory in the 21stcentury workplace. Organizational psychology re-examined. Psychology, 13 (02), 264-272.https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2022.132015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Muhamad, M., Sa’aid, H. B., Shukri, A., Razak, M. A. A. A. A., & Zainol, N. A. (2025). Herzberg’s hygiene factors and mental well-being: A study of environmental design, equipment, and safety in manufacturing sector. International journal of research and innovation in social science, 6856-6864. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.908000564 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mustafa, M. Z., Yamin, N. A., Razzaq, A., & Ahad, R. (2022). Factors influencing job satisfaction in the Malaysian vocational college: Herzberg two factor theory perspective. Universal journal of management, 10 (1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujm.2022.100102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nagpaul, T., Leong, C., Toh, C. S., Amir, A. B., Chin, R., & Tan, S. (2022). Exploring job satisfaction and intentions to quit among security officers: The role of work hygiene and motivator factors. Social Sciences, 11 (11), 497-497. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11110497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nanayakkara, M., & Dayarathna, N. D. (2017). Application of Herzberg’s two factor theory of motivation to identify turnover intention of the non-executive level employees in selected supermarkets in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Human Resource Management Journal, 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.31357/HRMJ.V4I1.2859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Noermijati, N. (2020). Aktualisasi teori herzberg: Suatu kajian terhadap kepuasan kerja dan kinerjamanajer operasional (penelitian di perusahaan kecil rokok sigaret kretek tangan di wilayahmalang). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Outofi, A., Kharazmi, E., Yousefi, A., & Heidari, A. (2014). The comparative study of hygiene-motivational factors based on Herzberg theory among faghihi and kossar shiraz hospitalsstaffs in 2011. Journal of Hospital, 13 (2), 97-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Puspitasari, N. A., Rizwar, R., Jarulis, J., Darmi, D., & Putra, A. H. (2022). Studi kesejahteraan kucingpeliharaan di beberapa toko hewan peliharaan (pet shop). BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains, 5 (2), 382-390. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v5i2.2352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sadeghi, A., Ramandi, S. D., Toroski, M., Emami, O., Heydari, G., & Shahraki, H. (2014). Viewpoints of the staff of north Khorasan university of medical sciences about the motivational and hygiene factors affecting their performance and satisfaction. Sadra Medical Sciences Journal,2 (2), 111-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Shaikh, S. H., Shaikh, H., & Shaikh, S. (2019). Using Herzberg theory to develop the employees’ performance of rafhan maize industry. The International Journal of Management, 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.10.3.2019/001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Shak, M. S. Y., Yashak, A., Tahir, M. H. M., Malik, N. A., Hasni, N. A., Kasmaruddin, N. I., & Ibrahim,N. (2022). Herzberg’s ‘hygiene’ factor and secondary Islamic studies teachers’ motivation level. International journal of academic research in business & social sciences, 12 (4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i4/12980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Silva, D. A. G. D., & Ferreira, D. (2023). Elements of interference in professional performance, well-being and productivity: A comparative study with companies in the supermarket sector in a Brazilian city. RGSA. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n2-002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Silva, P. M. D. (2024). The relationship between organizational climate and employee motivation of a hemotherapy center. https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2023.007-068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Tan, T. H., & Waheed, A. (2011). Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory and job satisfaction in the Malaysian retail sector: The mediating effect of love of money. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Torre, Y. G. L. (2024). Explorando la teoría de motivación de herzberg: Una revisión teórica de suimpacto en aspectos valorados por las organizaciones. Gestión en el tercer milenio, 27 (54),363-389. https://doi.org/10.15381/gtm.v27i54.27596 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Valk, R., & Yousif, L. (2021). “Going beyond to deliver hip hospitality”: Exploring motivation and job satisfaction of hospitality workers in Dubai. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2020-2517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Wedadjati, R. S., & Helmi, S. (2022). Evaluasi kepuasan karyawan berbasis herzberg’s two factorsmotivation theory. Manajemen, Bisnis & Akuntansi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Bisnis &Akuntansi, 21 (3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.33557/mbia.v21i3.1777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Wibowo, H. N., Wajdi, M. F., & Sholahuddin, M. (2024). Enhancing employee job satisfaction in the tax sector: The role of motivation and hygiene factors at the directorate general of taxes. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 3 (1), 200-219.https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v3i1.180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Ybañez, R. (2024). Application of Herzberg’s two-factor theory: Motivational factors and hygiene factors in the financial industry. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Zhang, M., & Devi, S. (2024). Toward a theory of motivation and performance for organizational employees: A case study of a Walmart store in the USA. Public Administration Research, 13(2), 9-9. https://doi.org/10.5539/par.v13n2p9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles