Malaysia’s Cultural Value Preferences and Industry 4.0 Readiness: A Conceptual Review

Industry 4.0 represents a transformative stage in global industrial development characterized by digitalization, automation, cyber-physical systems, and data-driven production. While Malaysia continues to implement Industry 4.0 strategies through initiatives such as the Industry4WRD policy, the nation’s readiness is influenced not only by technological and infrastructural factors but also by deeply rooted cultural values. This paper presents a conceptual review exploring how Malaysia’s cultural value preferences influence its readiness for Industry 4.0 transformation, particularly within the manufacturing sector. Drawing from Hofstede’s and Schwartz’s cultural frameworks, the paper discusses how collectivism, high power distance, harmony, and long-term orientation shape managerial practices, innovation adoption, communication, and leadership in Malaysian industrial contexts. The study highlights the dual nature of cultural traits acting both as enablers and inhibitors of technological transformation. By integrating cultural considerations into the assessment of Industry 4.0 readiness, this paper proposes a culturally contextualized understanding of industrial transformation in Malaysia. It concludes by suggesting future directions for research and policy to align digitalization efforts with Malaysia’s socio-cultural realities.

Malaysia, cultural values, Industry

1. Abdullah, A. (1996). Going glocal: Cultural dimensions in Malaysian management. Malaysian Institute of Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullah, A. (2001). Understanding the Malaysian workforce: Guidelines for managers. Malaysian Institute of Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2003). The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: Recognizing country and industry differences. Journal of Operations Management, 21(1), 19–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2022). Malaysia Economic Performance 2022. Putrajaya: DOSM [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hofstede Insights. (2023). Country Comparison: Malaysia. Retrieved from [https://www.hofstede-insights.com/] (https://www.hofstede-insights.com/) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ismail, N., Roslin, R., & Che Omar, C. M. Z. (2021). Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness among Malaysian manufacturers. Asian Journal of Technology Management, 14(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lim, L. (2012). Cultural values and leadership style in Malaysia. Journal of Asian Business and Management, 4(3), 112–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mahidin, A. M., Rahman, N. A., & Hassan, N. (2020). Cultural influences on organizational transformation in Malaysian manufacturing sectors. Asian Journal of Management Science, 12(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI). (2018). Industry4WRD: National Policy on Industry 4.0 – Malaysia. Putrajaya: MITI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2021). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 52, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sony, M. (2020). Human and cultural factors for Industry 4.0 readiness in developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sony, M., & Naik, S. (2020). Critical success factors for Industry 4.0 implementation in manufacturing organizations: A review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(4), 1313–1332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria