Reframing Library Marketing for the Digital Society: A Conceptual Model of Strategic Innovation and Engagement

The rapid acceleration of the digital society, characterized by information saturation and technological integration, compels libraries to undergo a fundamental strategic reframing. This paper argues that, to effectively counteract the narrative of obsolescence, libraries must transition from demonstrating value through passive, internal metrics (such as collection size or output statistics) to quantifying their tangible, outcome-based contribution to institutional mission. Despite empirical confirmation that digital marketing practices are significantly more effective than traditional methods in driving service utilization, the full integration of Library and Information Science theory with modern marketing frameworks remains a persistent challenge. This paper proposes the Digital Engagement and Innovation Framework (DEIF), a new conceptual model designed to bridge this gap. The DEIF synthesizes foundational marketing strategy (Segmentation, Targeting, and Positioning) with the library-centric 4S strategic model, operationalized through three interdependent pillars: Data-Driven Intelligence, which utilizes AI and predictive analytics for personalized services; User-Centric Design, which mandates the application of User Experience principles to all service touchpoints; and an Adaptive Organizational Structure, which formalizes marketing roles and addresses critical skills gaps and resistance to change. This framework positions strategic marketing as synonymous with outcome-based planning, emphasizing the collection of verifiable Return on Investment and Key Performance Indicators to justify fiscal commitment. The paper concludes by recommending the DEIF for rigorous empirical validation across diverse library sectors to ensure its effectiveness as a model for sustainable strategic innovation and engagement.

Library Marketing, Conceptual Model, Digital Transformation, User Experience

1. Islam, M. N., Hu, G., Ashiq, M., and Ahmad, S., [2024]. Exploring the landscape of big data applications in librarianship: A bibliometric analysis of research trends and patterns, Library Hi Tech. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Crilly, J., [2024]. Diversifying, decentering and decolonising academic libraries: a literature review, New Review of Academic Librarianship, vol. 30, no. 2–3, pp. 112–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Okunlaya, R. O., Syed Abdullah, N., and Alias, R. A., [2022]. Artificial intelligence (AI) library services innovative conceptual framework for the digital transformation of university education, Library Hi Tech, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1869–1892. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Lu, C., and Jimei, Z., [2024]. Visualizing the construction of subject librarianship in Chinese higher education libraries: A knowledge graph-based analysis, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, p. 09610006241259494. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Wang, J., Wang, S., and Liu, Y., [2025]. A study on the current status and driving force of library marketing in the digital age, Publications, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chang, Y.-W., [2018]. Exploring the interdisciplinary characteristics of library and information science (LIS) from the perspective of interdisciplinary LIS authors, Library and Information Science Research, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 125–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Raevskikh, E., Khalid, U., and Benghozi, P. J., [2022]. Culture in times of COVID-19: Resilience, recovery and revival. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Tawalbeh, A. K., [2025]. Influence of AI on marketing strategies for university libraries. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bedford, D. A. D., Donley, J. K., and Lensenmayer, N., [2015]. The role of librarians in a knowledge society: Valuing our intellectual capital assets, Current Issues in Libraries, Information Science and Related Fields, vol. 39, pp. 81–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hendrix, K. G., and Wilson, C., [2014]. Virtual invisibility: Race and communication education, Communication Education, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 405–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Olaniran, B. A., [2018]. Social media as communication channel in emerging economies: a closer look at cultural implications, Journal of Advances in Management Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 130–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Yu, W., Jiang, Y., and Fu, T., [2025]. Digital reading: a bibliometric and visualization analysis, Library Hi Tech, vol. 43, no. 2–3, pp. 513–541. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Deschenes, A. H., McMahon, M., and DeMarco, C., [2025]. Designing content for impact: A content strategy approach for libraries and beyond, Weave: Journal of Library User Experience, vol. 8, no. 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chigwada, J. P., [2020]. Librarian skillsets in the 21st century: The changing role of librarians in the digital era, Managing and Adapting Library Information Services for Future Users, pp. 41–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Amoah, G. B., and Minishi-Majanja, M. K., [2022]. Key performance indicators (KPIs) in Ghanaian university libraries: developing outcome-based metrics for staff performance, Performance Measurement and Metrics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 41–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chu, V., and Luke, B., [2023]. NPO web-based accountability: how can we know if NPOs are doing good things?, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 75–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. So, K. K. F., Li, J., King, C., and Hollebeek, L. D., [2024]. Social media marketing activities, customer engagement, and customer stickiness: A longitudinal investigation, Psychology and Marketing, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1597–1613. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sinha, R., [2018]. A comparative analysis of traditional marketing vs digital marketing, Journal of Management Research and Analysis, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 234–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Karim, R., Latip, N. A., Marzuki, A., Haider, S., Nelofar, M., and Muhammad, F., [2021]. The impact of 4Ps marketing mix in tourism development in the mountain areas: A case study, International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 231–245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. McDonald, C., [2022]. User experience. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: ProQuest Ebook Central, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nkomo, S., and Matli, W., [2025]. Adoption of artificial intelligence for library services at universities in Africa: are we there yet?, South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Khan, Z. I., [2025]. Exploring the influence of aesthetic design on user engagement in libraries: A quantitative analysis of UAE librarians’ perspectives, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, p. 09610006251335312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Farid, G., Warraich, N. F., and Iftikhar, S., [2025]. Digital information security management policy in academic libraries: A systematic review (2010–2022), Journal of Information Science, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1000–1014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Cox, J., [2023]. The position and prospects of academic libraries: Weaknesses, threats and proposed strategic directions, New Review of Academic Librarianship, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 263–287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fowler, E. R., Pothier, W. G., and Dow, D., [2025]. Growing organizational marketing, publicity, and outreach strategies with intention, Marketing Libraries Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Roy, P., [2025]. Transforming higher education libraries with data analytics, business intelligence, and business analytics: A review, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, p. 09610006241307028. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Williams, R. D., and Willett, R., [2019]. Makerspaces and boundary work: The role of librarians as educators in public library makerspaces, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 801–813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Siddiqui, Z. A., [2025]. The future of libraries: Skills, challenges, and innovative visions for future, Proceedings of the International Conference on Marching Beyond the Libraries (ICMBL): Leadership, Creativity, and Innovation, p. 78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ibrahim, S. E. A., [2025]. Lost in the algorithm: navigating the ethical maze of AI in libraries, South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Singh, S. K., [2024]. Librarian behaviour: Roles, responsibilities, and ethical considerations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lund, B. D., et al., [2023]. Barriers to scholarly publishing among library and information science researchers: International perspectives, Information Development, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 376–389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tickle, R. E., [2024]. Librarians for the study of the African-American experience: A content analysis of position announcements, 1970–2019, College and Research Libraries, vol. 85, no. 3, p. 316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Abu Eid, E. M., and Hussin, A. R. C., [2025]. Toward a library corporate social responsibility model: An empirical study, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 450–469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Aichner, T., Grünfelder, M., Maurer, O., and Jegeni, D., [2021]. Twenty-five years of social media: A review of social media applications and definitions from 1994 to 2019, Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 215–222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Mays, R., Wu, L., and Baer, A., [2010]. Measuring value and return on investment of academic libraries, Serials, vol. 23, no. 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kingma, B., and McClure, K., [2015]. Lib-value: Values, outcomes, and return on investment of academic libraries, phase III: ROI of the Syracuse University Library, College and Research Libraries, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 63–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kelly, B., Hamasu, C., and Jones, B., [2012]. Applying return on investment (ROI) in libraries, Journal of Library Administration, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 656–671. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Arshad, A., Ameen, K., and Jabeen, S., [2021]. Trends of print books usage among academic communities: A transactional log analysis, Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Emerging Roles of Library Professionals in the Digital Age
• User's Perceptions of Libraries Physical Infrastructure Facilities in United Arab Emirates and India: A Comparative Study
• Utilization of Print and Electronic Resources in a Private University
• Use and Impact of Social Media Tools for Information Services: A Lens on Librarians in State Polytechnics of North - East Nigeria