Active Listening, Procedural Fairness and the Legitimacy of Community Mediation

Active listening is widely recognised as a core competency in mediation, yet its procedural, psychological and socio-cultural significance in community mediation remains under-examined. This article argues that active listening forms the foundation of mediator neutrality, party trust and the perceived fairness of the mediation process, thereby determining whether mediated settlements endure. Grounded in the principles of natural justice, where audi alteram partem requires that parties not only speak but be genuinely heard, and nemo iudex in causa sua demands the appearance of neutrality, the article demonstrates that listening operates as a behavioural expression of fairness within a non-adjudicative framework. Drawing on historical and anthropological traditions in Asia, including Malay muafakat, Japanese conciliation norms and the consensus-based practices of indigenous Malaysian communities, the analysis illustrates that attentive listening has long been associated with moral authority and the preservation of social harmony. Through engagement with leading mediation scholarship, the article contrasts the limitations of passive listening with the transformative effects of active listening, which facilitates emotional ventilation, improves cognitive clarity, mitigates attribution bias and supports mutual understanding. In multicultural settings such as Malaysia, active listening must also be culturally adaptive to avoid misinterpretation of silence, eye contact or gesture. The study further clarifies its conceptual and methodological scope, positioning active listening as both an ethical and behavioural foundation for legitimacy in community mediation, and identifies future pathways for empirical validation across diverse cultural contexts. By integrating doctrinal reasoning, psychological insight and cultural context, this article concludes that active listening is not an optional technique but the ethical and structural foundation of community mediation, essential for achieving legitimacy, maintaining neutrality and producing durable, voluntary agreements.

Active listening, community mediation, natural justice

1. Abramson, H. I. (2004). Mediation representation: Advocating in a problem-solving process. Louisville: National Institute for Trial Advocacy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bhardwaj, K. (2008). Professional communication. New Delhi: I.K. International Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braithwaite, J. (2004). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brown, H. J., & Marriot, A. L. (1999). ADR Principles and Practice. Second edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bullen, B. A. (2012). Mediation: A training & resource guide for the mediator. USA: Trafford Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Butler, V. F. (2004). Mediation: Essentials and expectations. Pittsburgh: Dorrance Publishing Co. Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Charlton, R., & Dewdney, M. (2004). The Mediator's handbook: Skills and strategies for practitioners. (4th ed.). Lawbook Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dahlan, N. K., Md. Said, M. H., & Rajamanickam, R. (2021). Mediation: Practice in the corporate world. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 51–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Davis, J. W. S. (1996). Dispute Resolution in Japan. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Domenici, K., & Littlejohn, S. W. (2001). Mediation: Empowerment in conflict management. (2nd ed.). Long Grove: Waveland Presxs, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gray, F. (2016). Jung and Levinas: An ethics of mediation. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Haynes, J. M. (2004). Sexual harassment: Mediating an employment issue. In Haynes, J. M., Haynes, G. L., & Fong, L. S., Mediation: Positive conflict management (pp. 69–106). New York: State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Haynes, J. M. (2004). Support for human and social growth. In Haynes, J. M., Haynes, G. L., & Fong, L. S., Mediation: Positive conflict management (pp. 261–270). New York: State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Haynes, J. M., & Charlesworth, S. (1999). The fundamentals of family mediation. Annandale: The Federation Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hedeen, T. (2004). The evolution and evaluation of community mediation: Limited research suggests unlimited progress. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hope, M. K. (2014). The guided method of mediation: A return to the original ideals of ADR. (2nd ed.). Raleigh: Pax Pugna Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jayasundere, R., & Valters, C. (2014). Women’s experiences of local justice: Power and gender in the mediation boards of Sri Lanka (JSRP Paper 10). London, England: London School of Economics and Political Science. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/56350/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Khan, H. A., & Hak, N. A. (2018). Community Mediation in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Liebmann, M. (1998). Community and Neighbour Mediation. Great Britain: Cavendish Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Meierding, N. R. (2004). Managing the communication process in mediation. In Folberg, J., Milne, A., & Salem, P. (eds.), Divorce and family mediation: Models, techniques, and applications (pp. 225–247). New York: The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mooly Mei-ching Wong, Joyce Lai-Chong Ma, Rhea Rui Yuan. (2020). Effects of mediator competence and mediation process on dispute resolution outcomes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 41(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Narine, R. (1995). Power imbalances in mediation. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 1(1), 1–23. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/hnlr/wp-content/uploads/sites/91/Narine-Power-Imbalances-in-Mediation.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Randolph, P. (2016). The Psychology of Conflict: Mediating in a Diverse World. London: Bloomsbury. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Spencer, D., & Brogan, M. (2006). Mediation law and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Steil, L. K. (1981). On Listening...and Not Listening. Executive Health Newsletter. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Strasser, F., & Randolph, P. (2004). Mediation: A psychological insight into conflict resolution. London: Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sullivan, L. E. (ed.) (2009). The SAGE glossary of the social and behavioral sciences. London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tan, Seumas. (2012). Mediation Skills and Techniques: A Practical Handbook for Dispute Resolution & Effective Communication. Sweet & Maxwell Asia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Walker, J., & Hayes, S. (2006). Policy, practice, and politics: Bargaining in the shadow of Whitehall. In Herrman, M. S. (ed.), The Blackwell Handbook of Mediation: Bridging Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 99–128). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wing, L. (2009). Mediation and inequality reconsidered: Bringing the discussion to the table. Translating Cultures: Journal of Cross-Cultural Mediation, University of Nottingham. https://nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/ctccs/projects/translating-cultures/documents/journals/mediation-and-inequality-reconsidered-bringing-the-discussion-to-the-table.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.