The Impact of Leadership Dynamics on the Growth and Development of Home Cells: A Study of Perez Chapel International

Authors

Archbishop Charles Agyinasare

Perez University College, Ghana (Ghana)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000733

Subject Category: Theology

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 8999-9013

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-02

Accepted: 2025-11-10

Published: 2025-11-22

Abstract

Small groups are essential focal points for both qualitative and quantitative church growth in many mega Pentecostal and Charismatic churches. Previous studies have examined the use of small groups for administration, growth, and sustainability, but have often focused on programmes, activities, or leader selection rather than on the dynamics of leader–member relationships within these groups. This paper explores the impact of leadership dynamics on the growth and development of home cell groups at Perez Chapel International’s Perez Dome in Accra, Ghana. Drawing on Transformational Leadership, Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) theory, Social Identity Theory, and Team Convergence of Mental Models, the study employs a convergent mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected from 124 home cell participants and 7 regional leaders using a newly developed Home Cell Growth Scale and the LMX-7, complemented by attendance records from 126 home cell groups over a one-year period. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and thematically analysed. Reliability and factor analysis confirmed that the four growth dimensions (numerical, spiritual, welfare, and social) form a coherent and largely unidimensional construct. Results show that LMX is strongly associated with spiritual, social, and welfare growth, and moderately but significantly correlated with net numerical growth. Welfare and social growth emerged as the strongest predictors of actual numerical increase. Qualitative themes highlighted trust, open communication, personal care, community engagement, and the challenge of leadership burnout. The study concludes that highquality leader–member relationships are crucial for spiritual and relational health in home cells and that welfare and social care are key pathways to numerical growth. It recommends intentional support systems, shared leadership structures, and improved data practices to sustain home cell growth while guarding against leadership burnout.

Keywords

Pentecostals and Charismatics; Perez Chapel International; home cells

Downloads

References

1. Adubofour, S. B., & Ofei Badu, S. A. (2019). Small groups and church development in Ghana. Journal of Religious and Theological Studies, 5(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asamoah-Gyadu, J. K. (2005). African charismatics: Current developments within independent indigenous Pentecostalism in Ghana. Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Asamoah-Gyadu, J. K. (2019). God is big in Africa: Pentecostal megachurches and a changing religious landscape. Material Religion, 15(3), 390–392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2021). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 421–449. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brown, T., & Jackson, M. (2020). Pastoral care and congregational retention: A relational perspective. Journal of Practical Theology, 23(2), 105–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2020). Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(4), 355–376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2020). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101379. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2020). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader–member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1042–1087. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Garrett, R. (1998). The Gospels and Acts: Jesus the missionary and his missionary followers. In J. M. Terry, E. Smith, & J. Anderson (Eds.), An introduction to the foundations, history, and strategies of world missions (pp. 63–82). Broadman & Holman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hackman, J. R., & Walton, R. (2020). Leading groups in organizations. In J. R. Hackman (Ed.), Groups that work (pp. 72–112). Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Heifetz, R., & Linsky, M. (2020). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2020). Shared leadership and LMX: The moderating role of power distance. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(2), 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hogg, M. A. (2021). Social identity and group leadership: The role of leader prototypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(3), 285–308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hohenstein, J., & Jung, K. (2021). Spiritual leadership and member outcomes in Pentecostal congregations. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 49(2), 95–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hull, J. N. (2022). The role of home cell groups in fostering spiritual growth. Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care, 15(1), 56–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. (2021). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Khai, N. J. C. L., & Medina, N. M. L. C. (2024). Exploring the relationship between spiritual well-being and psychological well-being among novice clergy and senior priests in Myanmar. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(2), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kumar, N., Singh, R., & Osei, P. (2020). Transformational leadership and church effectiveness. Journal of Church Leadership, 11(1), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lee, S., Park, J., & Choi, H. (2022). Transformational leadership and member satisfaction in religious organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(3), 451–462. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Liang, J., Chang, C.-H., & Jiang, J. (2021). Leading under pressure: The effect of leader burnout on follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 101394. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lu, L., Cooper, C. L., & Lin, H. (2020). A cross-cultural examination of the impact of leadership on group outcomes. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 20(2), 215–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Manges, K. A., Wallace, A. S., Groves, P. S., Schapira, M. M., & Burke, R. E. (2021). Ready to go home? Assessment of shared mental models of the patient and discharging team regarding readiness for hospital discharge. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 16(6), 326–332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2019). Leader emotional intelligence and subordinate job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of main, mediator, and moderator effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Omobude, C. O., & Umemezia, E. I. (2019). Leader–member exchange and its implications on organizational outcomes. University of Benin, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ott, C., & Wilson, G. (2011). Global church planting: Biblical principles and best practices for multiplication. Baker Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Perez Chapel International. (2014). Annual report 2013–2014. Perez Chapel International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Robinson, M. A. (2023). Cell groups and community building. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(3), 567–583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Rogelberg, S. G., Shanock, L. R., & Scott, C. W. (2022). Burnout in leadership roles: Antecedents, mechanisms, and consequences. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(1), 45–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rowley, S. (2022). Pastoral care, community, and congregational growth. Journal of Practical Theology, 24(1), 61–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (2001). Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(1), 63–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2020). The social identity perspective in intergroup relations: Theories, themes, and controversies. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds.), Social identity processes (pp. 13–36). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Vanco. (2023). Ten hindrances gripping church growth and what to do about them. Vanco Faith Resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Wang, H., Sui, Y., Luthans, F., Wang, D., & Wu, Y. (2023). Impact of transformational leadership on team performance: The mediating role of leader–member exchange. Group & Organization Management, 48(1), 3–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yankyera, P. (2023). The role of the Holy Spirit in the ministry of Jesus in Luke 4:18–19 with an emphasis on Pentecostal and Charismatic churches in Ghana. Pentecostalism, Charismaticism, and NeoProphetic Movements Journal, 5(1), 13–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C. W. (2019). Leadership and aging at work: A review and agenda for future research. Work, Aging and Retirement, 5(1), 24–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., & Wang, Y. (2022). A meta-analysis of the relationship between transformational leadership and follower outcomes: Examining the role of context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(5), 738–760. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles