Selective Application and Global Financial Inequality in the Politicization of Anti-Money Laundering Enforcement: A Bibliometric Analysis

The article presents a bibliometric review of scholarly research on selective enforcement and politicization of anti-money laundering (AML) enforcement with a focus on how financial inequality worldwide influences enforcement patterns and research priorities in academe. With Scopus and Web of Science datasets for the period 2010–2025, and bibliometric tools such as co-citation analysis, co-word mapping, and temporal trend analysis, intellectual clusters, leading authors, and pioneering research themes are identified in this research. The conclusions highlight a growing academic focus from 2020 onwards on the political economy of AML, the spatially uneven distribution of AML scholarship, and persistent gaps in knowledge with regard to the nexus between enforcement selectivity and global financial inequality. The discussion shows that AML enforcement, while theoretically harmonised across the world, is politicised and disproportionately loads low- and middle-income countries. The paper sets out a future research agenda that integrates bibliometric information with political economy insight to frame equal and risk-based AML regulation.

Finance

1. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometric: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetric, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arnone, M., & Borlini, L. (2020). Anti-money laundering compliance and development implications. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(3), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barth, T. (2025). Scenario-based workforce planning and organizational performance. HR Executive Journal, 34(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bright, D., & Levi, M. (2022). Regulatory capture and selective enforcement in AML. Global Policy, 13(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Carpenter, D., & Moss, D. A. (2021). Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Christensen, J., & Shaxson, N. (2023). De-risking and global financial inequality: Impacts on LMICs. Development Policy Review, 41(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ferwerda, J. (2020). The politicization of anti-money laundering enforcement. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 23(3), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2020-0002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gandhi, P., Smith, R., & Chen, L. (2025). Strategic workforce planning in engineering organizations. McKinsey Insights, 12(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hudson, A. (2023). AML enforcement, financial inclusion, and small economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 85, 101534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101534 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jones, M. (2022). Global inequality and the unintended consequences of AML. International Review of Law and Economics, 70, 105986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2022.105986 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Levi, M. (2021). The US Anti-Money Laundering Act (2020) and its implications for enforcement. Crime, Law and Social Change, 75(5), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09965-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nance, M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of anti-money laundering research: Trends and gaps. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(4), 782–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2020-0057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharman, J. (2022). Extraterritorial AML enforcement and global financial power. Global Policy, 13(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Stiglitz, J. (2021). The political economy of financial regulation. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Teichmann, F. (2021). AML compliance and global financial hierarchies. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 29(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-12-2020-0140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Unger, B., & Ferwerda, J. (2022). Selective enforcement in anti-money laundering: Global perspectives. Crime, Law and Social Change, 78(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10020-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. van der Does de Willebois, E. (2021). Institutional capacity challenges in AML compliance for LMICs. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 9652. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors