Multiple Agencies and the Management of Maritime Industry in Nigeria.
Authors
Department of Marketing, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus (Nigeria)
Directorate of Research and Strategic Development, Maritime Academy of Nigeria, Oron, Akwa Ibom State (Nigeria)
Institute of Maritime Studies, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus. (Nigeria)
Institute of Maritime Studies, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus. (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG00230
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 9/14 | Page No: 3011-3023
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-06
Accepted: 2025-11-14
Published: 2025-11-28
Abstract
Maritime industry management environment has witnessed the proliferation of agencies without clear delineation of responsibilities. While multiple agencies are intended to strengthen the sector by bringing expertise and specialized support, their overlapping functions, poor coordination, and competition for relevance have generated certain inefficiencies that impede the efficient operation and development goals in the maritime industry. This study explores the implications of multiple agencies in the management of the maritime industry in Nigeria. Three objectives and three research questions and two hypotheses were proposed, answered and tested respectively in this study. Data was generated from 295 respondents, comprising of regulatory and government agencies, port administrators and terminal operators, port users and cargo owners, security and enforcement bodies using researchers’ developed questionnaire titled ‘Multiple Agencies and Management of Maritime Industry Questionnaire’ (MAMMIQ). Using descriptive statistics with qualitative insights from case studies, the researchers found out that there are overlaps and duplication of responsibilities amongst agencies involved the regulations and management of the maritime sector. Again, findings revealed that inter-agency rivalries lead to increased operational costs, double taxation, delay in cargo delivery and conflicting directives. Result also revealed that multi-agency involvement drives up financial burdens. Based on the findings of this study, the researchers concluded that Nigeria’s maritime governance structure encourages overlapping mandates among regulatory agencies which creates administrative bottleneck and operational inefficiency. Consequently, the researcher recommended the need for a maritime governance reforms that will urgently eliminate duplicated efforts, enhance coordination, and improve operation efficiency within the maritime domain.
Keywords
Multiple agencies, maritime industry
Downloads
References
1. Adeleke, L. (2018). Institutional fragmentation and policy incoherence in Nigeria’s maritime sector. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. African Journal of Public Administration, 12(3), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adesanya, O. A. (2020). Strengthening inter-agency coordination for maritime security in West Africa. Journal of Maritime Affairs, 19(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-020-00211-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Adewumi, T., & Aluko, O. (2023). Institutional coordination and operational efficiency in Nigerian seaports. Journal of Maritime Policy and Management, 50(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Akinwale, Y., & Ayodele, O. (2022). Institutional overlaps and port efficiency in Nigeria: An empirical analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(7), 912–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1967842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Akinyemi, T., & Adewuyi, A. (2020). Overlapping functions and governance challenges in Nigeria’s maritime industry. African Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 7(1), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Baird, A. J. (2020). Port governance and the problem of multiple agencies: Lessons from global ports. Transport Policy, 95, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.01. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Christopher, C. (2018). Unpacking the effects of competing mandates on agency performance. Public Administration Review 78(6) DOI: 10.1111/puar.12912. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323325311_. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Clark, X., Dollar, D., and Micco, A. (2004). Maritime transport costs and port efficiency (working paper). U.S. Department of Transportation / World Bank synthesis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. (2020). Reforming maritime governance: The role of institutional integration in port efficiency. Ocean & Coastal Management, 198, 105352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dawit, U. G. and Admasu, T. H. (2023). The impact of strategic alignment on organizational performance: The case of Ethiopian universities. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2247873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Emejulu, C., & Igboanusi, C. (2019). Administrative overlaps and performance of Nigeria’s port system. Nigerian Journal of Maritime Studies, 5(1), 67–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Joshua, E. M., Anthony, C. H., and Giuseppe, L. (2018). Multiplex Conflict: Examining the Effects of Overlapping Task and Relationship Conflict on Advice-Seeking in Organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology 33(1) DOI: 10.1007/s10869-017-9511https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318017172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kareem, L. (2025). Assessing maritime regulations: analyzing their impact on NIMASA's operational effectiveness. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390706771. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Nwanmuoh, E.E., Dibua, E. C., Amaife, H. T. and Obiokonkwo, L. C. (2021). Public relation strategies: a veritable tool for conflict resolution, peace building, democracy and national development. International journal of science academic research, 2 (7), 187-193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Nwokedi, C. (2022). Maritime security governance and institutional conflict in Nigeria. Security Studies Review, 18(4), 89–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Olagunju, A., & Ogundele, A. (2021). Multi-agency coordination and maritime efficiency: The Nigerian experience. International Journal of Transport Economics, 48(2), 101–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Okoro, P. (2021). Inter-agency rivalry and maritime security in the Gulf of Guinea. African Security Review, 30(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/102460291904203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Onwuegbuchunam, D. E., Ogbuehi, A., & Ibe, C. (2018). Institutional conflicts and the performance of maritime agencies in Nigeria. Journal of African Maritime Development, 3(2), 87–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Springe, A. (2025). Mastering the Art of Managing Overlapping Roles in the Workplace. https://www.functionly.com/orginometry/roles-and-responsibilities/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ukpai, U.E. and Ukpong, P. E. (2025). Exploring the critical nexus in informal cross-border trade between Nigeria and Cameroon: implications for policy reform in Nigeria. 2nd Hybrid international conference of the Institute of Maritime Studies, University of Nigeria, Enugu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. World Bank. (2022). Port Community Systems / Maritime Single Window and trade facilitation (reports & briefs). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria