Integrating the Philosophical Foundations of Education and Their Influence on Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in English Language Teaching (ELT): A Documentary Research

Authors

Sarinrat Eiamworawuttikul

Faculty of Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon (RMUTP) (Thailand)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100063

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 792-804

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-07

Accepted: 2025-11-14

Published: 2025-11-28

Abstract

This documentary study investigates the philosophical traditions that have shaped modern educational thought and examines how these traditions inform the design and practice of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in Basic English instruction. OBE, a learner-centered paradigm emphasizing articulated learning outcomes and performance-based assessment, has become a central model for reform across global education systems. By reviewing international scholarship, this paper analyzes the theoretical foundations that position OBE within broader epistemological, pedagogical, and ethical debates and considers how these foundations translate into the teaching of English as a foreign language. The synthesis indicates that OBE fosters transparency, coherence, and learner autonomy while also presenting difficulties related to assessment design, teacher preparation, and contextual adaptation. The study argues that OBE represents not merely a technical framework but a philosophically grounded approach that aligns with the communicative goals of Basic English learning, provided its implementation is supported by reflective practice and localized pedagogical sensitivity.

Keywords

Educational Philosophy, Outcome-Based Education, Learning Outcomes, Competency-Based Instruction

Downloads

References

1. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brubacher, J. S. (1982). On the philosophy of higher education. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment—Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Council of University Administrative Staff of Thailand. (2025). Using AI in Literature Review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. for Ethical Research (Batch 2). Professional Training. The Center for Higher Education Support Staff Promotion and Development. Retrieved on November 9, 2025 from https://lookerstudio.google.com/s/qynwmO6X7yY [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Google. (2025). Google Gemini AI for Education. Professional Training. Faculty of Education: Chulalongkorn University. OBEC: Bangkok, Thailand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education—The future is today. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 625–629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jansen, J. (1998). Curriculum reform in South Africa: A critical analysis of outcomes-based education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(3), 321–331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Killen, R. (2007). Teaching strategies for outcomes-based education. Juta & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mishra, S. (2017). Outcome-based education: Concept, history and implementation. International Journal of Research and Development in Technology & Management Science, 24(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Noddings, N. (2013). Education and democracy in the 21st century. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to speakers of other languages: An introduction. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. OECD. (2022). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (8th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ozmon, H. A., & Craver, S. M. (2008). Philosophical foundations of education (8th ed.). Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Merrill. Silpakorn University. (2025). Creative Learning: AI for Research Development. Artificial [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Intelligence for Enhancing the Quality of Research and International Academic Publications. Professional Training. SULIB THAPRA PALACE CAMPUS. Bangkok, Thailand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. UNESCO. (2020). The futures of education: Learning to become. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles