Continuous Improvement (CI) on PCB Layout using DRC (Design Rule Check) Settings Conceptual Analysis

Authors

R. Kishen Kumar Naidu

Faculty of Business & Communication, Malaysia, Sport Engineering Research Centre (SERC) Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Malaysia)

Mohammad Harith Bin Amlus

Faculty of Business & Communication, Malaysia, Sport Engineering Research Centre (SERC) Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Malaysia)

Muhammad Shahar Jusoh

Faculty of Business & Communication, Malaysia, Sport Engineering Research Centre (SERC) Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Malaysia)

Hafizah Abdul Rahim

Faculty of Business & Communication, Malaysia, Sport Engineering Research Centre (SERC) Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Malaysia)

Putri Aliah Mohd Hidzir

Faculty of Business & Communication, Malaysia, Sport Engineering Research Centre (SERC) Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Malaysia)

Syafiqah Md Nayan

Faculty of Business & Communication, Malaysia, Sport Engineering Research Centre (SERC) Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100068

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 835-839

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-14

Accepted: 2025-11-24

Published: 2025-11-29

Abstract

Continuous Improvement (CI) has become a critical strategy in enhancing the quality, reliability, and manufacturability of printed circuit board (PCB) designs. In PCB engineering, the application of Design Rule Check (DRC) settings serves as a systematic mechanism to identify layout violations and ensure compliance with electrical, mechanical, and fabrication standards. This conceptual paper examines how CI principles can be embedded into PCB layout workflows through optimized DRC configurations. The analysis highlights the role of structured rule-setting, iterative verification, and feedback loops in reducing design errors, minimizing rework, and improving overall design efficiency.The study further conceptualizes how disciplined DRC management—encompassing trace width control, spacing validation, thermal relief parameters, and manufacturability rules—supports CI initiatives by standardizing best practices and enabling consistent quality enhancements. The integration of CI frameworks with PCB design automation tools is also discussed as a strategic approach to strengthening decision-making, reducing cycle time, and facilitating cross-functional collaboration between design and manufacturing teams. This conceptual analysis provides a foundation for researchers and practitioners to better understand the relationship between CI methodologies and DRC-driven PCB optimization, while offering insights for future empirical investigation and process improvement model

Keywords

Continuous Improvement, Design Rule Check

Downloads

References

1. Avoiding Common Electronics Design Mistakes. (n.d.). Retrieved August 25, 2015, from http://valydate.com/images/stories/pdf/valydate_WP_Jan2013.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Misra, K. B. (n.d.). Handbook of Performability Engineering. Retrieved September 25, 2015, from https://books.google.com.my/books?id=cPgXg3GIMAsC&pg=PA1028&lpg=PA1028&dq=HANDBOOK OF PERFORMABILITY ENGINEERING pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barnhart, T. (n.d.). Creating a Lean R&D System. Retrieved August 25, 2015, from https://books.google.com.my/books?id=I7FE_DLSmJQC&pg=PA18&dq=continuous improvement in R&D [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Mitzner, K. (n.d.). Complete PCB Design Using OrCad Capture and Layout. Retrieved September 25, 2015, from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=z-tRRE9O8xMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=pcb design [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Savolainen, T. I. (1999). Cycles of continuous improvement: Realizing competitive advantages through quality. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19, 1203–1222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Montgomery, D. (2007, May 30). The Use of Statistical Process Control and Design of Experiments in Product and Process Improvement. Retrieved August 25, 2015, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07408179208964241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Research. (n.d.). Retrieved September 25, 2015, from http://www.ece.ncsu.edu/research/cas/ecs [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Schweikhart, S., & Dembe, A. (2009, October 1). The Applicability of Lean and Six Sigma Techniques to Clinical and Translational Research. Retrieved September 25, 2015, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2835466/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sánchez, J. (2012, August 9). Assessing Sustainability of the Continuous Improvement Through the Identification of Enabling and Inhibiting Factors. Retrieved September 25, 2015, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08222012-183238/unrestricted/Madrigal_J_D_2012_f1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Staples, M., Niazi, M., Jeffrey, R., Abrahams, A., Byatt, P., & Murphy, R. (2006). An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI. The Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles