Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Assessment, Engagement and Motivation among Secondary School Students in Kaduna State, Nigeria

This paper examined the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on student motivation and engagement in educational assessments. With the growing integration of AI technologies such as adaptive testing, automated grading, and intelligent feedback systems, assessment practices are being reshaped to promote efficiency, fairness, and personalization. The study reviewed the concept of AI in education, highlighting its potential to foster intrinsic motivation, enhance student engagement, and reduce assessment anxiety through real-time feedback and adaptive questioning. However, challenges such as ethical concerns, overreliance on technology, and possible bias in AI algorithms were also discussed. Findings suggest that while AI-powered assessments improve inclusivity, promote continuous learning, and sustain motivation, they also risk diminishing critical thinking and creativity if not carefully managed. The paper concluded that AI-driven assessments must complement, not replace, human judgment, and recommended that educators adopt blended assessment models that balance technology with human-centered learning principles.

Artificial Intelligence, Motivation, Engagement, Educational Assessment

1. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Howard, A., & Borenstein, J. (2018). The ugly truth about ourselves and our robot creations: The problem of bias and social inequity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1521–1536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9975-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. London: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Owens, M., Stevenson, J., Hadwin, J. A., & Norgate, R. (2012). Anxiety and depression in academic performance: An exploration of the mediating factors of worry and working memory. School Psychology International, 33(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034311427433 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1586012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policymakers. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Leadership Styles on Employee Adaptability During Digital Transformation: Change Management Practices and Organizational Support as Moderators