Relationship between Artificial Intelligence and Job Performance in Manufacturing Sector in Johor Bahru, Malaysia

Authors

Mar Sheng Yun

Human Resource Development Department, School of Human Resource Development & Psychology, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi (Malaysia)

Irmawati Norazman

Human Resource Development Department, School of Human Resource Development & Psychology, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi (Malaysia)

Ana Haziqah A Rashid

Human Resource Development Department, School of Human Resource Development & Psychology, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi (Malaysia)

Satriadi

STIE Pembangunan Tanjungpinang (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100318

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 4100-4113

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-21

Accepted: 2025-12-08

Published: 2025-12-09

Abstract

Along with the advancement of technology, artificial intelligence has become an indispensable part of our lives, especially towards the employee’s job performance. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between artificial intelligence and job performance in the manufacturing sector in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. The employee’s job performance was identified through task performance, contextual performance, and counterproductive work behaviour. Past studies revealed that the adoption of artificial intelligence in the workplace could improve job performance. The quantitative method was used in this study, and the questionnaire was distributed to the 108 respondents involved in this study, which contribute to 100% of return rate. The researchers used a cross-sectional design to investigate the relationship between artificial intelligence and job performance in manufacturing sector in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. The researchers allocated the questionnaire through email to the respondents from the manufacturing industry in different companies which mainly focus on small-medium enterprise that located in Mount Austin and Kempas, Johor Bahru. Besides, the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 27 was used to analyse the descriptive and inferential statistics of the data. The descriptive analysis included the mean score, frequency, standard deviation and percentage to identify the level of artificial intelligence and job performance of the respondents. Also, the inferential analysis which is the Pearson Correlation was used to examine the relationship between two variables. The findings showed the level of artificial intelligence and job performance of the respondents at a high level. Then, there is a significant and positive relationship between artificial intelligence and job performance. Furthermore, this study can be used as a guide and a reference for other researchers on related topics in future research, which the organisation can determine whether the use of artificial intelligence in the workplace will eventually affect job performance in the workplace.

Keywords

artificial intelligence (AI), job performance, task performance

Downloads

References

1. Devin, S., & Alami, R. (2016). An implemented theory of mind to improve human-robot shared plans execution. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE Abusalma, A. (2021). The effect of implementing artificial intelligence on job performance in commercial banks of Jordan. Management Science Letters, 11(7), 2061-2070. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed. M. Y, (2021). Utilization Of Artificial Intelligence (Ann) In Project Management Services: A Proposed Model of Application. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical & Applied, 2(10), 121-131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alahmad, R., & Robert, L. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) and IT identity: antecedents identifying with AI applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.12196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice, Kogan Page Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Badrianto, Y., & Ekhsan, M. (2020). Effect of work environment and job satisfaction on employee performance in pt. Nesinak industries. Journal of Business, Management, & Accounting, 2(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). The evolution of a theory of mind (pp. 261-277). na. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Baskaran, S., Lay, H. S., Ming, B. S., & Mahadi, N. (2020). Technology adoption and employee’s job performance: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics & Management Science, 9(1), 78-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brian T. Loher, R. A. (1985). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Job Characteristics to Job. Journal of Applied Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen, X., Wei, S., Davison, R.M. and Rice, R.E. (2019), “How do enterprise social media affordances affect social network ties and job performance?”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 361-388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cuzzolin, F., Morelli, A., Cirstea, B., & Sahakian, B. J. (2020). Knowing me, knowing you: theory of mind in AI. Psychological medicine, 50(7), 1057-1061. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dalal, R. S., Baysinger, M., Brummel, B. J., & Lebreton, J. M. (2012). The relative importance of employee engagement, other job attitudes, and trait affect as predictors of job performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 295-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01017.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Darmawan, D., M. Hariani, E. A. Sinambela. (2018). Basic Fundamentals of Human Resource Management, Metromedia, Surabaya [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Daryoush, Y., Silong, A. D., Omar, Z., & Othman, J. (2013). Improving job performance: Workplace learning is the first step. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 1(1), 100-107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. David Premack and Guy Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, 4 (1978), 515–526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 319-326). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Espel, P., Herbener, M., Rupprecht, F., Schröpfer, C., & Venus, A. (2020, April 17). How industrial companies can cut their indirect costs-fast. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/how-industrial-companies-can-cut-their-indirect-costs-fast#/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2018). IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step (15th ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Görür, O. C., Rosman, B. S., Hoffman, G., & Albayrak, Ş. (2017). Toward integrating Theory of Mind into adaptive decision-making of social robots to understand human intention. In Workshop on the Role of Intentions in Human-Robot Interaction, 2017 HRI Conference. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gupta, A., Mishra, P., Pandey, C., Singh, U., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive Statistics and Normality Tests for Statistical Data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_157_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied psychology, 60(2), 159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hammoud, M. S., & Osborne, S. (2017). Effective employee engagement in the workplace. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Haroon, R. (2020, June 21). Lower productivity, lack of contact are issues of concern for employer . Retrieved April 14, 2023, from https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2020/06/602102/lower-productivity-lack-contact-are-issues-concern-employer [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hemmer, P., Westphal, M., Schemmer, M., Vetter, S., Vössing, M., & Satzger, G. (2023). Human-AI Collaboration: The Effect of AI Delegation on Human Task Performance and Task Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 453-463). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hiatt, L. M., Harrison, A. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2011). Accommodating human variability in human-robot teams through theory of mind. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ’11) (pp. 2066–2071). AAAI Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Imran, M., Maqbool, N., & Shafique, H. (2014). Impact of technological advancement on employee performance in banking sector. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Vol 4(1), pp. 57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kamani, Tanvi (2020). Analysis of the Job Characteristics Model Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3600844 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3600844 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kamble, R., & Shah, D. (2018). Applications of artificial intelligence in human life. International Journal of Research–Granthaalayah, 6(6), 178-188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business horizons, 62(1), 15-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kheng, O. J. (2021). Factors Affecting Job Performance in a Multinational Company in Penang. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kim, K. J., & Lipson, H. (2009). Towards a simple robotic theory of mind. In Proceedings of the 9th workshop on performance metrics for intelligent systems (pp. 131-138). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Van Buuren, S., Van der Beek, A. J., & De Vet, H. C. (2014). Improving the individual work performance questionnaire using rasch analysis. Journal of applied measurement, 15(2), 160-175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Koopmans, L., (2011). Measuring Individual Work Performance. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(3) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kummerfeldt, V. D. (2011) Human resource management strategies for volunteers: A study of job satisfaction, performance, and retention in a non-profit organization. Capella University. 3449692, 1-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kuzey, C., Uyar, A. and Delen, D. (2014), “The impact of multinationality on firm value: a comparative analysis of machine learning techniques”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 59, pp. 127-142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Latif, M. S., Ahmad, M., & Qasim, M. (2013). Impact of employee’s job satisfaction on organizational. European Journal of Business and Management, 167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lestari, N. S., Rosman, D., Chan, S., Nawangsari, L. C., Natalina, H. D., & Triono, F. (2022, October). Impact of Robots, Artificial Intelligence, Service Automation (RAISA) Acceptance, Self-efficacy, and Relationship Quality on Job Performance. In 2022 4th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Lomax, R. G., & Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (2012). An Introduction to Statistical Concepts (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Manaware, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence: a new way to improve Indian agriculture. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 9(03), 1095-1102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Matsa, P., & Gullamajji, K. (2019). To study impact of artificial intelligence on human resource management. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(8), 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019, January). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350423/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Nasution, A. A., Harahap, B., & Ritonga, Z. (2022). The Influence of Product Quality, Promotion and Design on Purchase Decisions for Yamaha Nmax Motor Vehicles SPSS Application Based. International Journal of Economics (IJEC), 1(1), 01-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Ojo, S. O., Bailey, D. P., Chater, A. M., & Hewson, D. J. (2018). The impact of active workstations on workplace productivity and performance: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 417–434. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Pwc (2019), “Sizing the prize: exploiting the AI Revolution, What’s the real value of AI for your business and how can you capitalise?”, PwC’s Global Artificial Intelligence Study, available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/data-and-analytics/publications/artificial-intelligencestudy.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rai, A., Constantinides, P., and Sarker, S. 2019. “Editor’s Comments: Next-Generation Digital Platforms: Toward Human–AI Hybrids,” MIS Quarterly, (43:1), pp. iii-ix. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.66 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 419-450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. psych.59.103006.093716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Salleh, I. (2022, January 10). Pandemic sees rise of tech-savvy workforce: FastJobs. BusinessToday. Retrieved April 13, 2023, from https://www.businesstoday.com.my/2022/01/10/pandemic-sees-rise-of-tech-savvy-workforcefastjobs/#:~:text=%E2%80%9C48%25%20of%20companies%20in%20the,compared%20to%2019%25%20in%202020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Selene, X.B. and Gong, P. (2014), “Review of business intelligence through data analysis”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 300-311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Shields, J. 2016. Managing Employee Performance and Reward: Concepts, Practices and Strategies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological management of individual performance, 23(1), 3-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Sypniewska B. (2020). Counterproductive Work Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Adv Cogn Psychol, 10; 16(4):321-328. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0306-9. PMID: 33500742; PMCID: PMC7809919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Syukrina Alini Mat Ali, N. A. (2014). Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model to Job Satisfaction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Tarafdar, M., Bolman Pullins, E. and Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2014), “Examining impacts of technostress on the professional salesperson’s behavioural performance”, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 51-69, doi: 10.1080/08853134.2013.870184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Taşgıt, Y. E., Baykal, Y., Aydın, U. C., Yakupoğlu, A., & Coşkuner, M. (2023). Do employees’ artificial intelligence attitudes [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Tewari, G. (2022, November 8). Council post: Recent advancements in artificial intelligence. Forbes. Retrieved April 13, 2023, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2022/10/07/recent-advancements-in-artificial-intelligence/?sh=7e862b407fa5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Thompson, J.A. (2005), “Proactive personality and job performance: a social capital perspective”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90 No. 5, pp. 1011-1017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Tong, S., Jia, N., Luo, X., & Fang, Z. (2021). The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(9), 1600-1631. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Tuomi, I. (2018). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Learning, Teaching, and Education. Policies for the future, Eds. Cabrera, M., Vuorikari, R & Punie, Y., EUR 29442 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978-92-79-97257-7, doi:10.2760/12297, JRC113226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Van Der Vaart, L. (2021). The performance measurement conundrum: Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 24(1), 3581. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Viswesvaran, C. and Ones, D.S. (2000), “Perspectives on models of job performance”,International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 216-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Wang, B., Rau, P. L. P., & Yuan, T. (2022). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. West, D. M., & Allen, J. R. (2022, March 9). How artificial intelligence is transforming the world. Brookings. Retrieved April 13, 2023, from https://www.brookings.edu/research/how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-the-world/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Wijayati, D. T., Rahman, Z., Rahman, M. F. W., Arifah, I. D. C., & Kautsar, A. (2022). A study of artificial intelligence on employee performance and work engagement: the moderating role of change leadership. International Journal of Manpower, 43(2), 486-512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Xin, O. K., Wider, W., & Ling, L. K. (2022). Human Resource Artificial Intelligence Implementation and Organizational Performance in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 22(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Younus, A. M. (2022). The Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Job Performance in China's Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Spanish journal of innovation and integrity https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361227924_The_Effect_of_Artificial_Intelligence_on_Job_Performance_in_China%27s_Small_and_Medium-Sized_Enterprises_SMEs affect individual business performance? Journal of Organisational Studies and Innovation, 10(2), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.51659/josi.22.176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles